Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
DVD Reviews

HTF REVIEW: Star Trek Enterprise - The Complete First Season



This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
58 replies to this topic

#1 of 59 OFFLINE   Scott Kimball

Scott Kimball

    Screenwriter



  • 1,500 posts
  • Join Date: May 08 2000

Posted May 02 2005 - 03:30 AM

Posted Image

Star Trek Enterprise - The Complete First Season







Studio: Paramount

Year: 2001

Rated: NR

Length: 19 Hours, 7 Minutes

Aspect Ratio: 1.78:1, Anamorphically enhanced

Audio: Dolby Digital 5.1: English, English 2.0

English Subtitles

Closed Captioned

Special Features: Audio Commentary on "Broken Bow", Text Commentary and Deleted Scenes on select episodes, featurettes, outtakes

Estimated Street Price, $100 USD
Release Date: May 3, 2005


Fan reaction to the premiere of Enterprise was decidedly mixed. Many hardcore fans felt that the series was an insult to the franchise - it had taken too many liberties with the Trek timeline and tried too hard to distance itself from the franchise in an effort to be different. The show’s producers went so far as to not include Star Trek in the title, calling it, simply, “Enterprise.” This would change in later seasons, in a failed attempt to win back some of the Star Trek faithful.

The Trek geek in me is going to show, here, as I attempt to divulge some admittedly small issues that had many Trek fans disappointed. The little things count, however - a cumulative effect turned off many viewers before the Enterprise left spacedock.

The very first incursion into the established lore was the appearance of a Klingon with the brow ridges that first appeared in Star Trek: The Motion Picture. I’d have been happy to see an old-style Klingon, who fit into the timeline. This little inconsistency is never mentioned in any of the commentaries or featurettes.

The prologue brings us to the title sequence. Trek fans have gotten used to seeing “beauty shots” of the vessels set to a classical theme. It’s been tradition since the original series. Enterprise changed gears and delivered a pop music theme over a historical progression of images relating to exploration. It’s a nice enough title sequence - but it was one more shock to the system.

Many long time fans were shocked with the portrayal of the Vulcans as a controlling, manipulative race. Very different from the Vulcans of old... Berman and Braga explain it away as a hundred years of political evolution having changed their attitude toward other races, etc. I don’t buy it. It would take longer for such a change to take place within a culture where the people’s life spans exceed one hundred years.

Then there are the Ferengi... a race that was supposed to have it’s first introduction to the human race in a conflict with Captain Picard and the Enterprise D... unless you count the Roswell incident from DS9. Now we find them introduced to Starfleet in the pre-Kirk days.

I could go on...

The casual fan may wonder what all the fuss is about. The problem is that the long time Trek fan has a personal investment in the franchise. Many wanted a show that was true to Trek history and lore. Rick Berman and Brannon Braga didn’t understand that. They wanted creative freedom, and ignored established lore to increase that freedom. If that’s what they wanted to do, they should have disconnected the series completely from the Trek universe.

Now I’ll turn my geek mode off.

If you can get by all that I’ve stated above, and accept Enterprise on its own merits... it isn’t a bad show. It’s not up there with Deep Space Nine in terms of story arc construction, or The Next Generation or The Original Series in terms of chemistry between characters. But it exceeds Voyager in most respects, and is certainly better than most of what passes for “sci-fi” on television these days. I will have some comments on future seasons in my future reviews - there was a point where I gave up on the show - but I’ll discuss that at another time.


Some standount episodes in season one include:
“The Andorian Incident”
Archer, Trip and T’Pol visit a Vulcan monastery only to discover it has been raided by Andorians, who have been in a long cold war with the Vulcans. The Andorians believe that the Vulcans are hiding weapons or surveillance equipment at the monastery.

“Civilization” has Archer pondering the effects that spacefaring races can have on undeveloped cultures when they find an advanced race secretly conducting mining operations on a more primitive world. The operations cause an illness that spreads through the community.

“Cold Front” introduces (for better or worse) the concept of the “Temporal Cold War,” a thread which would run throughout the series.

“Dear Doctor” is a moving episode in which Phlox is asked to find a cure for a disease which infects a large population on Valakia. When he realizes that a cure would impact the future of the planet, he and Archer face a difficult decision.

“Shuttlepod One” finds Trip and Malcolm marooned on a shuttle with no way to reach safety before their air supply is exhausted.

“Vox Sola” finds the crew facing an extremely unusual first contact.

“Fallen Hero”
The Enterprise is tasked with transporting a Vulcan ambassador to a rendezvous with a Vulcan ship. Along the way, they meet up with several ships that want to stop them. The Enterprise is put to the test in a race to the rendezvous.

“Shockwave” is the season’s cliffhanger, bringing back the time-travel plot once again.

Then there are some less impressive episodes... probably the worst of which, “Unexpected,” finds a male crewmember pregnant. Other less desirable episodes include Strange New World, Breaking the Ice, Silent Enemy, Fusion, Rogue Planet, and Two Days and Two Nights.


Viewscreen On
Here we have the first anamorphically enhanced Star Trek TV series on DVD, and it looks mighty fine.

The image is sharply detailed and exhibits excellent contrast. Black levels are strong, with good shadow detail. Whites are bright and restrained, retaining detail in the brightest highlights.

The wonderful set design of the Enterprise really comes through with fine texture detail. Panel displays and source lighting are well rendered. Visual effects come across very nicely and believably.

There are a few, very rare and mild, instances of moire effects and mosquito noise, but they are hardly worth mentioning and will go unnoticed by all but the most scrutinizing viewer. This is the finest looking Star Trek TV series on DVD.

Hailing Frequencies
The Dolby Digital 5.1 track delivers the goods as well as you’ve heard for a television source. The soundstage is open and active, containing panning dialog and effects and a nice, full range of frequencies. LFE effects are solid when called for, delivering room-shaking effects.

The mix is clean and never allows music or effects to obscure the dialog.

While you’ll find more active mixes on feature films on DVD, this is good stuff for television.


Special Features

Audio Commentary by Rick Berman and Brannon Braga on “Broken Bow”

While not as revealing as the Braga/Moore commentaries on the TNG films, there is a lot of practical information in this commentary. It is a very reactive commentary, very scene specific. It is revealed that the two hadn’t seen the pilot for a few years prior to recording the commentary. Topics covered include the use of digital effects to a much greater extent than in previous Star Trek series, sets and set design, casting, fan reaction to controversial aspects of the series, etc. Also discussed: efforts to “date” the look of the series, and liberties taken to reflect current design standards while trying to give the impression that the series took place before the original series. While there is some discussion of the alterations to the Trek universe, there isn’t a lot of focus on the subject, and no apologies beyond the notion that they couldn’t please everyone.

Text Commentaries by Michael Okuda and Denise Okuda
These commentaries appear in a similar format as seen in the last couple of season sets of TOS. The graphic and text frequently takes up a large amount of screen real estate. In “Broken Bow,” there are a few very minor discrepancies between the text commentary and the audio commentary. A word of warning: there are spoilers in these text commentaries that go as far forward as season four - divulging the ultimate fate of one character. This, to me, was completely unnecessary. As one who has nott seen any of season four, this was information I’d rather not have found out. You have been warned.

Text Commentaries are available on: Broken Bow, The Andorian Incident, Vox Sola.

Deleted Scenes
Deleted scenes are available for select episodes: Broken Bow, Fight or Flight, Sleeping Dogs, Shuttlepod One, Oasis, Fallen Hero, Two Days and Two Nights, Shockwave (Part 1).

In most cases, the scenes were most likely cut for time. Many of them have interesting character development, or are good scenes that were just unneeded for exposition. Other scenes that were cut were very brief or uninteresting.

The deleted scenes are available individually, or with a “play all” feature when there is more than one included with the episode. The scenes are without sound effects, music, or (in some cases) visual effects. The video quality is at or near the same quality as in the episodes.


The featurettes are not anamorphically enhanced - a disappointment given that the show is the first enhanced Trek program.

Creating Enterprise (11:27)
This begins with footage taped, apparently before the premiere of Enterprise, of Scott Bakula introducing the cast on the bridge set.

Rick Berman and Brannon Braga talk about the decision to make Enterprise a prequel, and the opportunities that would open up. Berman talks about staying “true to the timeline” (!). Most interestingly, Herman Zimmerman talks about the design the the new starship - and placing the sets in the proper timeline with proper design. He compares some of the props with props from the original series.

O Captain! My Captain! A Profile of Scott Bakula (9:30)
Most of the cast take a moment gushing about Bakula, the man. Bakula talks about his character, and his approach to the character in an on-set interview. Aside from cast members, there are comments from Andre Bormanis and LeVar Burton. Interspersed between interviews are some behind the scenes clips, and clips from some episodes.

Cast Impressions: Season One (12:25)
All of the main characters get a chance to talk about their casting, early days adjusting to their roles, and “finding their characters.” The interviews were done on set and in costume. Pretty standard fare.

Inside Shuttlepod One (7:57)
Brannon Braga talks about his love for the episode “Shuttlepod One.” He relays his feelings that it was important to create more character-driven episodes. Connor Trinnear and Dominic Keating talk about their work on the show. Rick Berman talks about the show from a budgetary perspective, saying they needed to do a cheap show. As usual, there are clips from the episode between the interview segments.

Star Trek Time Travel: Temporal Cold Wars and Beyond (8:11)
Brannon Braga reveals that the idea for the Temporal Cold War came about by way of pressure from the studio to include a more futuristic element in the show. Michael Opuda comments on the difficulty of maintaining a Star Trek timeline, due to the amount of time travel seen in the show, and the huge number of writers over the years. The featurette is ended with a series of text and photo slides showing instances of time travel throughout the Star Trek franchise.

Enterprise Secrets (2:00)
We are taken on a brief tour of what’s behind some of the practical effects of the Enterprise. What makes the warp core light up? How does the food dispenser work? You’ll find the answers here.

Admiral Forrest Takes Center Stage (5:14)
Vaughn Armstrong sings about the women of Trek.
Armstrong is one of the busiest character actors in all of Star Trek. In Enterprise, he steps out from behind the makeup to play a human character, Admiral Forrest. Armstrong talks about his work on Trek, and his audition (for the role of Ambassador Suvol). Not satisfied to stay out of makeup, Armstrong also plays a Klingon in an episode of Enterprise.

Enterprise Outtakes (9:03)
We hoped for blooper reels for the original series. We got them here.
Nine minutes of line flubs, laughing, tripping, practical jokes, etc. This is a pretty good blooper reel. It’s not every day you see a Vulcan laugh.

Borg Invasion Trailer (:32)
A trailer for the Borg attraction at the Las Vegas Hilton


NX-01 FILE 01 (2:56)
Jolene Blalock talks about Shadows of P’Jem
NX-01 FILE 02 (2:11)
Dan Curry talks about Klingon designs for Broken Bow
NX-01 FILE 03 (4:58)
Artist Geoffrey Mandel talks about ship control designs for season one


Final Thoughts
Watching all these episodes again on DVD, I had a different reaction than when I first watched the show during the original airing. Perhaps, the first time around, as an avid Trek fan, there was just too much “different” for me to take in. It was a shock to the system.

While I like most of the other Trek series better, this show bests Voyager in its willingness to cover new territory - even if it is at the expense of established lore at times. The willingness to be different is both a benefit and a deficit to the show.

This boxed set is served up with a commentary on the pilot which is fairly interesting, some text commentaries on select episodes which contain serious (and unnecessary) spoilers, and several featurettes, deleted scenes and outtakes.

Most of the featurettes are standard fare - familiar to those who have seen previous Trek TV sets. I can’t say that they were compelling - but some did provide some entertainment and the occasional interesting nugget of information. The outtakes were fun, as well.

Most importantly, the set features excellent transfers.

#2 of 59 OFFLINE   Sean.S

Sean.S

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 185 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 19 2004

Posted May 02 2005 - 03:45 AM

A shock to the system. How very true. Coming off of three TOP-NOTCH seasons of Voyager, the pilot of Enterprise was NOT something I liked upon first viewing. But, there were several episodes in the season that I liked that really evoked teh Star Trek feel: "Acquisition," "Sleeping Dogs," "Dear Doctor," "Strange New World," "Fallen Hero" and others. And, there are some I haven't seen like "Cold Front," "Terra Nova," and "Shuttlepod One" And, I'm willing to give "Broken Bow" a second try now that I'm a huge ENT fan. Good to hear the video quality is great. I've also heard good things about the packaging, and the extras. I'll be picking up this set tommorow.

#3 of 59 OFFLINE   Mark Maltais

Mark Maltais

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 195 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 13 2002

Posted May 02 2005 - 05:29 AM

Price should/has to come down before I shell out for this...100 bucks for one season is crazy, especially for a series that never really took off...Paramount must be crazy and are guessing enough of the die hard fans cough up for this!

#4 of 59 OFFLINE   Sam Davatchi

Sam Davatchi

    Producer



  • 3,151 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 15 1999

Posted May 02 2005 - 10:41 AM

I’m on disc 4 and I’m enjoying this set. About the series, well I don’t want to see the same thing again, if I want to see the same thing again, I would watch my TNG DVDs again. It’s good to see difference and alternate "takes". I also like the opening title and the way it is different; however I would have kept Star Trek in the title!

#5 of 59 OFFLINE   Jason_V

Jason_V

    Producer



  • 4,881 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001
  • Real Name:Jason
  • LocationBothell, WA

Posted May 02 2005 - 11:45 AM

I fell off the Enterprise wagon mid season 2, popped in for some of season 3 and have been watching on and off season 4. Unfortunately, it didn't catch me in the beginning and there's no way I'm going to be dishing out $100 for a show I really don't like.

However, I loved geek mode in the review. Those are some of the things that turned me off to whole show.

#6 of 59 OFFLINE   Torgny Nilsson

Torgny Nilsson

    Second Unit



  • 255 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 08 2003

Posted May 02 2005 - 12:00 PM

I could never get past the constantly pissed-off vulcan character. That contradiction was enough to keep me away from the series for good.

#7 of 59 OFFLINE   Will_C

Will_C

    Second Unit



  • 271 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 04 2004
  • Real Name:Will

Posted May 02 2005 - 12:37 PM

I wonder how big of a following this show will gain over the next 25 years. Back in '91, during Trek's 25th anniversary, and also unfortunately the year Gene Roddenberry passed away, the PR department really put in overtime and a number of people I knew who didn't watch Trek became at least moderate fans. All the movies up to that point, TOS having been in syndication for a while and a number of good TNG eps surely helped though. Perhaps Enterprise will weather the years well with younger audiences coming up with it. I've tuned into the show a few times over the years, and I've been lucky to see more good eps than bad. I'll be picking up the set and enjoying it this weekend.
Rick Hunter
USMC Force Recon Scout Sniper
"If you run, you'll only die tired."

#8 of 59 OFFLINE   david_hu

david_hu

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 91 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 09 2005

Posted May 02 2005 - 03:41 PM

I've always thought that the tampering with 'Trek Lore' as some people used as an excuse for its failure is a bit of baloney. Yes, there is a hard core group who know the ins and outs way back to Kirk, but i hazzard a guess to say that most of todays Trek fans jumped on board when Next Gen appeared and are mostly clueless about what fits and what doesn't fit with Trek history going back to the original.
I only have vague memories of the original and am not all that interested in it.I would speculate the majority feel the same.
There are probably various reasons for its failure, but not following Trek lore I would think would be miniscule in the reasons given by most fans of the franchise.
I dropped off, but started viewing it again in season 3 and am enjoying it. And as a Trek fan(minus the original)I'll purchase Enterprise and give it a second go.

#9 of 59 OFFLINE   KyleC

KyleC

    Supporting Actor



  • 845 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 01 2003

Posted May 02 2005 - 04:11 PM

Scott,

In your review you said:

Quote:
The Dolby Digital 5.1 track delivers the goods as well as you’ve heard for a television source. The soundstage is open and active, containing panning dialog and effects and a nice, full range of frequencies. LFE effects are solid when called for, delivering room-shaking effects.


And on the digitalbits they say:


Quote:
The series' audio is presented in Dolby Digital 5.1, but it's not quite as impressive as the 5.1 mixes on other Trek DVDs have been. Most of the action is very biased to the front half of the soundstage, with only subtle panning and light, atmospheric use of the surround channels. Still, the episodes sound very good, with clear dialogue and well mixed music and effects. If it isn't the most immersive audio presentation,



I was just curious as these two reviews seem somewhat at odds. Do you think Enterprise sounds better than all of the other Trek TV Shows?

#10 of 59 OFFLINE   Scott Kimball

Scott Kimball

    Screenwriter



  • 1,500 posts
  • Join Date: May 08 2000

Posted May 03 2005 - 06:33 AM

Kyle,
I didn't do a direct comparison with other Trek product, but I found the audio to be rendered well for a TV show.

I heard some nice panning effects, on occasion, across the front soundstage. As with most TV product I've heard, surrounds are non-aggressive. They are used, though, for ambient effects, ship flybys, etc.



-Scott

#11 of 59 OFFLINE   KyleC

KyleC

    Supporting Actor



  • 845 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 01 2003

Posted May 03 2005 - 06:38 AM

Thanks Scott. Posted Image

#12 of 59 OFFLINE   Dewitte

Dewitte

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 173 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 25 2002

Posted May 03 2005 - 02:53 PM

I know I'm going to regret this, but...

Quote:
The very first incursion into the established lore was the appearance of a Klingon with the brow ridges that first appeared in Star Trek: The Motion Picture. I’d have been happy to see an old-style Klingon, who fit into the timeline. This little inconsistency is never mentioned in any of the commentaries or featurettes.

But it is explained in Season 4, specifically the two-episode arc of "Affliction" and "Divergence." Even before then, Fred Phillips (the makeup guy on TOS and The Motion Picture) said he'd always wanted the Klingons to look that way.

Quote:
Many long time fans were shocked with the portrayal of the Vulcans as a controlling, manipulative race. Very different from the Vulcans of old... Berman and Braga explain it away as a hundred years of political evolution having changed their attitude toward other races, etc. I don’t buy it. It would take longer for such a change to take place within a culture where the people’s life spans exceed one hundred years.

Manny Coto (staff writer turned executive producer in Season 4) also thought this odd, which brought about the three-episode arc of "The Forge," "Awakening," and "Kir'Shara" in Season 4.

Quote:
Then there are the Ferengi... a race that was supposed to have it’s first introduction to the human race in a conflict with Captain Picard and the Enterprise D... unless you count the Roswell incident from DS9. Now we find them introduced to Starfleet in the pre-Kirk days.

Watch "The Last Outpost" (the first appearance of the Ferengi on TNG) again and pay attention to the dialogue regarding previous encounters with the Ferengi. There's some wiggle room for an appearance on Enterprise, even if the episode portrayed the crew as dumber than a box of rocks.

De
Retroactive Continuity - Yet another source of nuttiness on the Web!

#13 of 59 OFFLINE   Scott Kimball

Scott Kimball

    Screenwriter



  • 1,500 posts
  • Join Date: May 08 2000

Posted May 04 2005 - 02:21 AM

Ah... I see.

We should have been more patient.
Posted Image

Many gave up on the show long before season four.

-Scott

#14 of 59 OFFLINE   Ric Easton

Ric Easton

    Screenwriter



  • 2,814 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 06 2001

Posted May 04 2005 - 05:03 AM

Well then Scott, I'll anxiously await your season 4 review! I think you'll like where the series finally headed! As for this review, great job as always.

Ric

#15 of 59 OFFLINE   Scott Kimball

Scott Kimball

    Screenwriter



  • 1,500 posts
  • Join Date: May 08 2000

Posted May 04 2005 - 05:14 AM

I've heard the show got better in season 4.

I was somewhat interested in the show for quite a while, but I completely gave up in the
World War II Nazi Alien arc.
When Archer woke up in the first part of the cliffhanger, and saw an alien in a Nazi uniform, I lost all respect for the series. I never saw where they went with it, but that era has been visited far too often in Star Trek - and Berman and Braga already covered that territory in Voyager. It was such a tired concept that I just didn't tune in the next season.


I forget if that was the season 2/3 cliffhanger, or the 3/4 cliffhanger.

#16 of 59 OFFLINE   Bill Williams

Bill Williams

    Screenwriter



  • 1,699 posts
  • Join Date: May 28 2003

Posted May 04 2005 - 06:47 AM

That was the 3/4 cliffhanger, Scott, at the end of "Zero Hour" and going into "Storm Front".

I could not agree more, the really spoilerific Okuda texts ruined things for me, particularly since I've not seen the last 6-7 episodes of the series since I moved. And it looks like I won't get to see them until they're on DVD.
"I have in my heart what it takes to run with the big dogs in this life, and nobody can say otherwise."

"Attention all personnel. Tonight's movie is a holdover from last week and will be shown right after supper, which is also a holdover from last week."

#17 of 59 OFFLINE   Jason_V

Jason_V

    Producer



  • 4,881 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001
  • Real Name:Jason
  • LocationBothell, WA

Posted May 04 2005 - 09:13 AM

Quote:
i hazzard a guess to say that most of todays Trek fans jumped on board when Next Gen appeared and are mostly clueless about what fits and what doesn't fit with Trek history going back to the original.


Yeah, I'm 26 and started with TNG, then worked my way into TOS during the run. Then I followed DS9...and tried Voyager and Enterprise. The show doesn't work for me because, at nearly every turn, I spot glaring problems with the story or groundwork.

First Contact with the Klingons?
Never meeting the Borg before TNG S2?
The aforementioned Ferengi?
NEVER hearing about Archer in four successive series'?

And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

#18 of 59 OFFLINE   KyleC

KyleC

    Supporting Actor



  • 845 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 01 2003

Posted May 04 2005 - 11:37 AM

I got my copy today and I think it looks great. My only gripe is the packaging. Everytime I pull the discs out and them put them back into that sleeve the book catches the plastic sleeve. It's a royal pain sometimes to get it to go in. I flipped through real quick to see the first Trek series in widescreen and so far so good. I prob won't watch it until after we're done Farscape though towards the end of this year.

#19 of 59 OFFLINE   Rutgar

Rutgar

    Second Unit



  • 495 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 17 2004

Posted May 04 2005 - 12:06 PM

I bought this set on Tuesday, and started watching it tonight. I don't know if it's because I know the show is canceled or what. But the show is better than I remember it being.

That being said, I have a question about the first episode. Either I missed something, or they left something out. Towards the end T'Pol and Trip are arguing about rescuing the Captain. T'Pol is against it, standing on her Vulcan logic. The scene ends with the two nose to nose with no apparent resolution. Next thing I know, they're in the process of a rescue attempt, even though they never showed where they resolved the issue one way or the other.

#20 of 59 OFFLINE   Dewitte

Dewitte

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 173 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 25 2002

Posted May 04 2005 - 01:51 PM

Quote:
First Contact with the Klingons?
Picard mentioned that first contact with the Klingons occurred centuries ago in "First Contact" (TNG). 2151 would be a little more than two centuries prior from Picard's standpoint in 2367 in the episode.

Quote:
Never meeting the Borg before TNG S2?
The episode "Regeneration" was a sequel to the events of Star Trek: First Contact, which had already changed things to some extent.

Quote:
The aforementioned Ferengi?
Again, watch "The Last Outpost" and you'll see there is a bit of wiggle room for an appearance in Archer's time.

Quote:
NEVER hearing about Archer in four successive series'?
There was a planet called Archer IV named in "Yesterday's Enterprise" (TNG). Besides, how many times did we hear about John Harriman or Rachel Garrett aside from their sole appearances? Why didn't Zefram Cochrane mention Picard and company (or the Borg) in "Metamorphosis" (TOS)?

De
Retroactive Continuity - Yet another source of nuttiness on the Web!


Back to DVD, Blu-ray & Digital HD Reviews



Forum Nav Content I Follow