Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Has Robert De Niro "Retired?"


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
45 replies to this topic

#1 of 46 OFFLINE   Chris Farmer

Chris Farmer

    Screenwriter



  • 1,494 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 23 2002

Posted January 06 2005 - 11:31 AM

Looking around the net recently, I've noticed a lot of articles criticizing Robert De Niro for his recent choices in movie roles, namely going for a lot of light comedy instead of the weighty, dramatic roles that made him famous and gave him an creditable claim to "Greatest actor of his generation." Just do a Google search for the phrases "Say it ain't so" and "De Niro" and you'll see exactly what I mean (I tried to track down an editorial one of the columnists over the The Digital Bits wrote saying many of these things, but couldn't find it), he's been roundly criticized for his parts in Analyze This, Meet the Parents, their respective sequels, Showtime, Rocky & Bullwinkle, etc.

So my question is, why has he made that shift? Has he lost his mind? Is he just "phoning it in" for the money? Does he simply not care anymore? My personal belief is that this is his "retirement" from movies. Let's face it, this man has defined more characters then just about any other actor, and has put a massive number of quotes in popular culture. Jake La Motta, Travis Bickle, young Vito Corleone, Noodles Aaronson, and plenty of others are absolutely fantastic performances. I'm still in awe of how well they aged him in Once Upon A Time In America, he has aged in real life to look almost exactly like he did in the "old Noodles" scenes of that movie. I think now though, he's tired of those heavy, taxing roles. He knows that they're forever ingrained in cinematic history, and he probably won't ever match those performances again, so I think now he's doing parts that he simply finds fun. This is his way of enjoying himself, getting to work in his chosen profession for sheer enjoyment, and not having to work at getting the emotional drama and power of his signature roles. Now, he can simply enjoy giving Ben Stiller a lie detector test over pornography, or break down crying at an insurance commercial. His place in history is established, this is a man who has nothing left to prove, and can now afford to take advantage of that fact.

Anyway, that's what I thought looking at the last few movies he's been in, anyone else have any thoughts?

#2 of 46 OFFLINE   Ricardo C

Ricardo C

    Producer



  • 5,060 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 14 2002

Posted January 06 2005 - 11:52 AM

Personally, I've enjoyed his comedic roles, for the most part. People change. I doubt he's "phoning it in for the money." He could do that playing the type of roles he's most famous for, but he's instead focusing on comedy. And quite well, I might add. Whether he is deliberately going into lighter roles to "have fun" now that he knows his cinematic immortality is assured, I can't say. Doesn't seem like a bad reason, though Posted Image
Man, an hour wasted on this sig! Thanks, Toshiba! :P

#3 of 46 OFFLINE   Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford

    Studio Mogul



  • 25,036 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 1998
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMichigan

Posted January 06 2005 - 11:57 AM

Anyway, that's what I thought looking at the last few movies he's been in, anyone else have any thoughts?
Any actor or director that's been in the business for over 30 years is going to make some career decisions that didn't exactly shine for them. However, DeNiro has done some good work besides the comedies, they just don't match up with his golden era of performances which is going to happen in a long career.
  • Men of Honor: Good film with some good acting performances.
  • The Score: Liked it a lot with Edward Norton.
  • City by the Sea: Film was mediocre, but I thought he gave a good performance.
  • 15 Minutes: Good concept just didn't work for me.
  • Hide and Seek: 2005 Release, I'm looking forward to it with Dakota Fanning and Elizabeth Shue.
  • The Bridge of San Luis Rey: Another 2005 release I can't wait for.
  • The Good Shephard: He is producing/directing this film about the CIA with Matt Damon and himself in the cast.

Crawdaddy

 

Blu-ray Preorder Listing

 


#4 of 46 OFFLINE   chris winters

chris winters

    Second Unit



  • 275 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 12 1999

Posted January 06 2005 - 12:00 PM

i think it has more in common with Michael Jorden switching to Baseball. He was at the top of his game dramtically for quite awhile, now he wants to stretch different acting muscles. Comedy is very difficult. Its not easier, and hes not "phoning it in". he is adding a layer to his legacy. A fine comedic straightman, as well as a helluva dramtic actor. Im sure he will profile some oscer worthy drama again, maybe even for scorsesi. For now hes making some very fine comedies.
Movies are like books, except you can't set your' drink on them, well.. unless its a DVD...oh nevermind

#5 of 46 OFFLINE   Richard Travale

Richard Travale

    Producer



  • 3,424 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 27 2001
  • Real Name:Rich Travale
  • LocationThe Island, Canada

Posted January 06 2005 - 12:06 PM

Quote:
i think it has more in common with Michael Jorden switching to Baseball.

Except for the fact that DeNiro is actually good at these comedic roles. Posted Image

 "Cock your hat - angles are attitudes. "
- Frank Sinatra 

#6 of 46 OFFLINE   Vince Maskeeper

Vince Maskeeper

    Lead Actor



  • 6,504 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 18 1999

Posted January 06 2005 - 12:12 PM

Except for the fact that DeNiro is actually good at these comedic roles.


I actually think Jordan was better at baseball. I hate DeNiro in comedy- I think he's unwatchable.

And while it's not the same thing, his appearance on SNL was so embarassing I was physically tired from cringing through the whole debacle.
Need an introduction to home theater? Check out our FAQ and Primer!!

#7 of 46 OFFLINE   Thi Them

Thi Them

    Producer



  • 3,650 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 20 1999

Posted January 06 2005 - 12:13 PM

Since what many would call his turn to comedy with Analyze This in 1999, he's had about 17 roles in that 5 or 6 year period. As Robert mentioned, he's done dramatic roles in that time, which some people seem to forget. I think the fact is, he's just working more, wants more variety, and isn't receiving as many of those Oscar-worthy roles as he used to.

~T

#8 of 46 OFFLINE   george kaplan

george kaplan

    Executive Producer



  • 13,064 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 14 2001

Posted January 06 2005 - 12:56 PM

DeNiro has some great dramatic roles, especially in The Godfather 2 and Goodfellas, but overall I like a greater percentage of his comedic roles than his dramatic roles.
"Movies should be like amusement parks. People should go to them to have fun." - Billy Wilder

"Subtitles good. Hollywood bad." - Tarzan, Sight & Sound 2012 voter.

"My films are not slices of life, they are pieces of cake." - Alfred Hitchcock"My great humility is just one of the many reasons that I...

#9 of 46 OFFLINE   Peter Kline

Peter Kline

    Screenwriter



  • 2,409 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 09 1999

Posted January 06 2005 - 04:33 PM

DeNiro is no longer a young leading-man. Actors do age and they can't play the same roles they did when they were younger. Times marches on. Reviews of his recent comedy movies have been positive. His next film is a drama "Hide And Seek" with Dakota Fanning. In the movie, DeNiro plays father to Fanning, who discovers that his nine-year-old daughter has come up with an unexpected and terrifying way of dealing with her mother’s death through a seemingly imaginary friend named Charlie. But her father soon realizes that Charlie isn’t make-believe.

#10 of 46 OFFLINE   Holadem

Holadem

    Lead Actor



  • 8,972 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 04 2000

Posted January 06 2005 - 04:51 PM

Quote:
DeNiro is no longer a young leading-man. Actors do age and they can't play the same roles they did when they were younger. Times marches on.
Sure but there has got to be more to it. Listen, there are plenty of aging actors, Pacino, Hackman, Nicholson just to name a few. They aren't playing the same roles they did decades ago either but whatever they are doing today does not feel like they've sold out.

The problem with Deniro's recent choices is that they are SO beneath him it feels like he is betraying his legacy.

--
H

#11 of 46 OFFLINE   Chris Farmer

Chris Farmer

    Screenwriter



  • 1,494 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 23 2002

Posted January 06 2005 - 05:02 PM

See, I disagree there Holadem, which was my idea behind this. I don't think he's betraying his legacy any more then a famous surgeon who retires to the links while he can still perform his work is betraying his legacy. I've definitely enjoyed his comedy roles, and find Analyze This to be one of the funnier movies I've seen (the less said about Analyze that the better though). My thoughts though was that he feels like he's done the hard work, and now he can try his hand at other, lighter material. Nothing he can do can erase the brilliance of his earlier performances, but he can sure enjoy doing something far different then what he's done before.

#12 of 46 OFFLINE   Lynda-Marie

Lynda-Marie

    Supporting Actor



  • 762 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 03 2004

Posted January 06 2005 - 05:15 PM

I think the notion that perhaps De Niro is trying his hand at comedy or other types of roles is a good one. After all, while he is awesome at drama, the intensity of the roles have to be quite draining. Too, it seems that there is a dearth of roles lately that are actually worthy of his dramatic skills.

Selling out to make more money? Well, why not? He's been in the business a while, and while he probably makes more money in a single role than many of us will see in a lifetime doing 9-5 jobs, it's got to be irritating as hell to see no-talent twerps getting $10 - $15 million and up per film because they are pretty, rather than hard working and talented. I won't name names, make up your own minds as to WHICH dipsticks are inferred. Why NOT make an empty blockbuster and make some REAL bucks? Where is the law against that, and how is it actually selling out?

Robert De Niro is an actor, not a saint, and he'd probably like to make some BIG money. That makes him just as human as we 9-5ers.

The shape I'm in you could donate my body to science fiction! - Rodney Dangerfield, "Back to School"

#13 of 46 OFFLINE   Nick C.

Nick C.

    Second Unit



  • 251 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 27 2001

Posted January 06 2005 - 05:51 PM

Quite a coincidence... Stephanie Zacharek of Salon just did a column about De Niro's waning 'legacy'. Personally, I wouldn't mind the 'selling out' idea myself, as posters above have mentioned, since it's money in his pocket, and Zacharek argues the same, even though he has his own production company, Tribeca, which according to IMDb includes a repertoire of over 30 pictures, which assures De Niro of gross cuts on both the front and back ends. Zacharek's criticism is not that De Niro is making bad pictures, but that he is phoning in his performances. I haven't seen most of the pictures she names, such as ANALYZE THAT and MEET THE FOCKERS, but I did enjoy the contrast he brought to the few comedies I have seen him in (MIDNIGHT RUN, ANALYZE THIS), since they so oppose his tough-guy intensity from his most memorable roles.

Just some food for thought.
later Pooh...

#14 of 46 OFFLINE   Scott Weinberg

Scott Weinberg

    Lead Actor



  • 7,482 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 03 2000

Posted January 06 2005 - 06:42 PM

Great thread and discussion. My 2 cents:

De Niro's a true great, an actor who deserves every ounce of praise he's ever earned. I love the guy.

But I'm sick to effing death with his comedy roles. He seems to have exactly ONE speed in comedy: gruffy, slow-burny, grumpy jerk. Not that his most unmemorable foray into slapstick (Rocky & Bullwinkle) was anything to write home about.

Do I think he's a "sellout"? Shit no. The guy's a working actor and he's out there working. If I LOVED all his comedies, then he's not a sellout...but if I hate those movies (which I do) then he IS a sellout? Meh, I don't buy it.

Let's be frank here: for all his serious talent, De Niro's never been the most "versatile" actor in the universe. He's strong and commanding and often very powerful, but he's not exactly a chameleon-type actor. And I think that the recent comedies manage to highlight the guy's shortcomings more than his strengths.

I think he's funny in The King of Comedy, Wag the Dog, Brazil and Midnight Run - but those are two extremely well-written movies. Meet the Fockers? Analyze That? Showtime? C'mon, Bob. Frankly I'm more afraid of him veering exclusively towards limp psycho-thrillers (Godsend, Hide and Seek) than staying in comedy.

Still, the guy could make 50 pieces of crap in a row and he'd deserve a lifetime achievement award. The quality of his body of work, as a whole, more than speaks for itself.

(I, like many of you, also enjoyed his work in The Score and City by the Sea.)

#15 of 46 OFFLINE   george kaplan

george kaplan

    Executive Producer



  • 13,064 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 14 2001

Posted January 06 2005 - 10:45 PM

Well I'm not at all surprised at the "sellout" takes. So-called "serious" musicians are sell-outs when they make some music that's popular. Dylan was a sell-out when he used an electric guitar (gasp), etc.

In films, it's mostly when a 'serious (read: dramatic)' actor does a comedy.

Why? Because comedy and rock music don't get the respect they deserve compared to drama and classical and jazz. That's just the way it is. Fine. But there are some of us who think that a great comedy is just as good as a great drama. Cary Grant used to get guff cause he had so many comedic roles, so this is nothing new.

And there's a reverse application of this too. A comedic actor does a drama and is good (e.g., Tom Hanks, Steve Martin, Bill Murray, Alec Guinness, Danny Kaye) we're not only impressed, we're surprised, because who knew that someone who was just doing comedies could really act? (shock)

If DeNiro had done comedies first, and then done dramas, everyone would be impressed. But because he goes from dramas to comedies, he's a sellout. Posted Image
"Movies should be like amusement parks. People should go to them to have fun." - Billy Wilder

"Subtitles good. Hollywood bad." - Tarzan, Sight & Sound 2012 voter.

"My films are not slices of life, they are pieces of cake." - Alfred Hitchcock"My great humility is just one of the many reasons that I...

#16 of 46 OFFLINE   Sam Favate

Sam Favate

    Producer



  • 4,944 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 03 2004
  • Real Name:Sam Favate

Posted January 06 2005 - 11:53 PM

I think DeNiro's best comedic role is still in Midnight Run. I'm glad to see him make so many movies, even if they aren't all Oscar calibur. Considering the output of his contemporaries (Pacino, Hoffman, etc.), DeNiro's dance card is very full. Plus, he runs Tribeca productions, so maybe the comedies he makes allows him to fund other projects.

#17 of 46 OFFLINE   Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford

    Studio Mogul



  • 25,036 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 1998
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMichigan

Posted January 07 2005 - 12:00 AM

Plus, he runs Tribeca productions, so maybe the comedies he makes allows him to fund other projects.

Give that man a cigar! The list is too long to mention how many great actors and directors made certain films in order to make those films that really appeal to them. It takes a lot of financial backing to make a film today and De Niro unlike Harrison Ford for example never was one who appeared in several box office champions.

Crawdaddy

 

Blu-ray Preorder Listing

 


#18 of 46 OFFLINE   TonyD

TonyD

    Executive Producer



  • 16,240 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 01 1999
  • Real Name:Tony D.
  • LocationDisney World and Universal Florida

Posted January 07 2005 - 06:30 PM

ok, makes sense.
but what are the films that he wants to make on his own terms, "those films that really appeal to him."

hope its not films like godsend.
facebook.com/whotony

#19 of 46 OFFLINE   Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford

    Studio Mogul



  • 25,036 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 1998
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMichigan

Posted January 07 2005 - 10:05 PM

but what are the films that he wants to make on his own terms, "those films that really appeal to him."
Only De Niro can give you the definitive answer, but the following are 2004/2005 films he's producing in conjuction with his production company. By the way, Meet the Parents/Meet the Fockers are two films he also produced.
  • Stage Beauty
  • Artemis Fowl
  • The Good Shephard (Also, directing and acting)
  • Chaos (Also acting)
  • Rent

Crawdaddy

 

Blu-ray Preorder Listing

 


#20 of 46 OFFLINE   AlexCremers

AlexCremers

    Second Unit



  • 432 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 29 2004

Posted January 07 2005 - 11:52 PM

So, am I the only one who thinks his portrayal of Max Cady in Cape Fear was bordering on parody?





Forum Nav Content I Follow