What's new

Possible Release of Disney's "Song of the South"? (1 Viewer)

George Fogel

Agent
Joined
Oct 27, 1998
Messages
42
Dick Cook, Chairman of the Walt Disney Studios spoke at this summer's Annual Convention of the NFFC, the club for Disney Enthusiasts. The Septeber/October 2004 issue of the FantasyLine Express (the club's newsletter) reported part of his talk:

 

Jeremy Little

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 9, 2001
Messages
770
If it involves modifying or deleting anything in the original film, they should forget about releasing it.

IF the make an introduction to the film and leave the original material alone, I'm all for seeing it out on DVD.
 

MatthewLouwrens

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2003
Messages
3,034
Well, at least it sounds like they are actually considering the matter. Good news, thanks for reporting it.

Absolutely agreed.
 

ZackR

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 27, 2003
Messages
611
Wow. This is encouraging news. I would love to get an official copy. But I agree, they should not edit anything at all. Otherwise, don't release it. They could just put one of their "This was a different time...yadda yadda yadda...don't hold it against us...yadda yadda yadda..." warnings before it. As long as we get the film. One of my favorites!!

This is seriously EXCELLENT news!!! :D
 

Patrick McCart

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 16, 2001
Messages
8,196
Location
Georgia (the state)
Real Name
Patrick McCart
I'd simply put a Leonard Maltin intro before the film and a disclaimer on the packaging.

Even better, mention on the front cover that James Baskett won an Oscar as Uncle Remus. I think it's important that Song of the South features performances (remember, he also voiced Br'er Fox) that won Baskett not only an Academy Award, but also the first ever to a male African American (SotS even features Hattie MacDaniel as a supporting actress, who won the first Oscar, period, to an African American).
 

Casey Trowbridg

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2003
Messages
9,209

I also absolutely agree with this. I have never seen this film but would very much like to, and believe that while the depictions in this film maybe shouldn't be celebrated...ok, probably shouldn't, they shouldn't be ignored or brushed aside either. It is a part of history after all even if it is not one of our shiniest moments. I am speaking when I say that more of the attitudes displayed in the film itself and other types of entertainment, then the actual film itself.
 

Steve Tannehill

R.I.P - 4.28.2015
Senior HTF Member
Deceased Member
Joined
Jul 6, 1997
Messages
5,547
Location
DFW
Real Name
Steve Tannehill
I have the laserdisc. There are only two areas that might be questionable in this movie, IMO.

1) Happy Singing Slaves
2) The Tar Baby

The slave singing is no more offensive, again IMO, than Prissy in Gone with the Wind.

The Tar Baby may be a little more sticky...do we want our kids using this term, after they hear it used time and time again watching this movie on repeat play on DVD? Will the Leonard Maltin "political correctness" introduction be geared towards kids? Do people even care anymore?

Other than that, this is a typical Disney movie about a boy who escapes a broken family by listening to the colorful stories of Uncle Remus. Enough already, Walt. Come out of suspended animation and release this movie!

- Steve
 

Ernest Rister

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2001
Messages
4,148
I guess Disney is tired of losing money to e*bay.

********

As for the "singing slaves" charge -- there are no slaves in Song of the South. The movie is set after the Civil War, on a plantation that is farmed by White and Black Sharecroppers.
 

MarcusUdeh

Supporting Actor
Joined
Sep 23, 2003
Messages
785

No not him, I have my reasons. How about Whoopi Goldberg doing the introduction? That previous statement is mean not to be a joke. The cleverest thing to do is packaging and marketing this movie to an adult audience(i.e. film buffs). No animated characters featured on the cover. On the shrink-wrap a warning sticker that this movie is not children’s fare /keep it simple Disney black background, with large silver and almond cursive font, for the film’s DVD cover.
 

Ernest Rister

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2001
Messages
4,148
How about a jacket that lists the Oscars this film won, with Uncle Remus and Bobby Driscoll and Luanna van Patten and all the animated characters...

...and then on the back, photoshop all of these people turning around, flipping off the camera, under the words, "There are no slaves in this movie - either watch it or shut the hell up"
 

EricSchulz

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2004
Messages
5,587


I hope that is a joke! SOTS was re-released in the late 60's I believe, and I saw it in a theater in Chicago with my family. I was maybe 8 or 9 years old. It was, AND STILL IS, a family movie! Why not view it for what it is: an historical document!
 

Jeff Ulmer

Senior HTF Member
Deceased Member
Joined
Aug 23, 1998
Messages
5,582
Make it a Disney Treasures with an intro and be done with it. Edit/crop the film and it disappears from the buy list.
 

MatthewA

BANNED
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
9,727
Location
Salinas, CA
Real Name
Matthew
At least we got more than an evasion from Mr. Cook.

This film has been rereleased to theaters 3 times since the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: in 1972, 1980, and 1986.

The song Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah was featured in a 1980 TV episode of the anthology series devoted to Oscar-winning studio films; clips were featured in various opening credits sequences of the anthology series for years. The idea that it should be locked away because times have changed started with Eisner's regime.
 

Harold Southard

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
138
IMO they should just release it as-is. No intro. No editing. Just a good transfer and good sound. Those who are offended by it will be offended no matter what you do. We live in the United States of the Offended. I'm sick of it. It is what it is. When is all this politically correct crap going to stop. Why don't we just edit the history books while we are at it, wait they have already started doing that. Just release it already. They are making movies today that I think are much worse than SOTS could ever be.
 

Ken Martinez

Auditioning
Joined
Nov 29, 2003
Messages
14
I think Disney should just release it AS-IS. Censorship is a step backward from enlightenment.

While I enjoy the animated characters and songs from Song of the South, on a critical level this film is mediocre at best.



Ernest: are you stating that you want people to watch the movie and then comment whether they agree with you or not or that they should shut up and not provide an alternative viewpoint on Song Of The South?
 

TravisR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
42,478
Location
The basement of the FBI building
I would be beyond shocked if Disney ever releases this cartoon again. I don't care what Dick Cook said. If they announce they are going to release it, the story will be called "Disney Releases Racist Cartoon On DVD". Then people will complain (having seen it or not having seen it), Disney will chicken out instantly, pull it from whatever release they planned to put it on, and back to the Disney vaults it will go.

Whatever your thoughts on The Song Of The South, that's what would happen.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,016
Messages
5,128,469
Members
144,241
Latest member
acinstallation449
Recent bookmarks
0
Top