Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

DTS 5.1, Dolby Digital 5.1 - what is is the best??

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 of 7 OFFLINE   Jeff-0


    Stunt Coordinator

  • 60 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 16 2004

Posted December 19 2004 - 03:34 PM

is there a real difference?

#2 of 7 OFFLINE   Mark C.

Mark C.

    Supporting Actor

  • 558 posts
  • Join Date: May 21 1999

Posted December 19 2004 - 03:56 PM

Personal preference, really. Do a search here and find literally years of debate on the topic.

#3 of 7 OFFLINE   Bill Mullin

Bill Mullin

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 164 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 15 1999

Posted December 20 2004 - 12:27 AM

One real difference, in my receiver at least, is that there is no dynamic compression offered when watching DTS movies. This usually means that I end up watching a DTS movie with the remote in my hand so that I can quickly change the volume when the sound becomes too loud or too soft. Additionally, movie events such as gun shots, car accidents, explosions, etc. become ear shattering. Because of this, I usually watch my movies in DD mode and using "standard" compression. - Bill

#4 of 7 OFFLINE   AlanZ



  • 1,335 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 15 2002

Posted December 20 2004 - 12:52 AM

I couldn't tell you what the differences are, if any......all I know is that when I'm buying a DVD, two things I look for are 1) widescreen format, and 2) DTS track. Number one is a must have, of course, and even though I can do without number two, I still get excited when I can watch a flick in DTS......even if it's just some dialogue driven drama with little use of the rears. I just like it better!
"Come on you Fockers....CONGA!!!"
-Dustin Hoffman as 'Bernie Focker'

Updated Equipment List

#5 of 7 OFFLINE   Philip Hamm

Philip Hamm

    Lead Actor

  • 6,887 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 23 1999

Posted December 20 2004 - 12:55 AM

There isn't a difference that I care about. I would rather have the bandwidth available for video than a DTS track. I used to have DTS capability and now I don't and I don't miss it at all.
Philip Hamm
Moderator Emeritus

#6 of 7 OFFLINE   John Garcia

John Garcia

    Executive Producer

  • 11,566 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 24 1999
  • Real Name:John
  • LocationNorCal

Posted December 20 2004 - 04:09 AM

There's an extensive commentary on this in the FAQ, found in the basics area.
HT: Emotiva UMC-200, Emotiva XPA-3, Carnegie Acoustics CSB-1s + CSC-1, GR Research A/V-1s, Epik Empire, Oppo BDP-105, PS4, PS3,URC R-50, APC-H10, Panamax 5100 Bluejeans Cable
System Two: Marantz PM7200, Pioneer FS52s, Panasonic BD79
(stolen) : Marantz SR-8300, GR Research A/V-2s, Sony SCD-222ES SACD, Panasonic BD-65, PS3 60G (250G)

Everybody is a genius, but if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it’ll spend its whole life believing that it is stupid.” – Albert Einstein


#7 of 7 OFFLINE   Jerome Grate

Jerome Grate


  • 2,937 posts
  • Join Date: May 23 1999

Posted December 20 2004 - 04:46 AM

Ugh, worms everywhere now Posted Image
But DTS fan myself eventhough DD is great also.
Listen Up People.., Rack Em and Pack Em.., We're Phantoms in 15.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users