Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Matrix SE released separately from box set?

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

#1 of 34 OFFLINE   Aaron Thorne

Aaron Thorne

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 199 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 29 2003

Posted October 30 2004 - 02:35 AM

I noticed in the upcoming release of the Matrix trilogy set that there is a new release of the first Matrix film included. Now I already own all three films and could give a damn about the extras and the anime so the box set does not appeal to me. I am wondering if WB is planning to release the first film in a 2 disc SE like the releases of Reloaded and Revolutions. I am not dropping $70-$80 on three films I already own but will be glad to pay $15-$20 to get the best film of the trilogy by far with a new transfer and a matching keepcase that corresponds with the others. I remember talks of this being released awhile back. Any hope?
Farewell and adieu to you fair Spanish ladies.
Farewell and adieu to you ladies of Spain.
For we've received orders to sail back to Boston.
And so nevermore shall we be seeing you again.

#2 of 34 OFFLINE   Brent M

Brent M


  • 4,486 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 15 2001

Posted October 30 2004 - 04:14 AM

I wouldn't hold my breath. If it is released separately it probably won't be for at least another year or so. Otherwise, nobody would buy the box set in the first place.
"If you're good at something, never do it for free."

#3 of 34 OFFLINE   Travis W.

Travis W.

    Second Unit

  • 305 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 11 2004

Posted October 30 2004 - 04:22 AM

A few places are selling the box set for around 55 dollars. I wouldn't expect a seperate release right away but I think it'll happen in the future.

#4 of 34 OFFLINE   Brent M

Brent M


  • 4,486 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 15 2001

Posted October 30 2004 - 06:30 AM

They'll probably release the SE separately a few months before it comes out on HD-DVD. images/smilies/furious.gif
"If you're good at something, never do it for free."

#5 of 34 OFFLINE   Chuck Mayer

Chuck Mayer

    Lead Actor

  • 8,053 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 06 2001
  • Real Name:Chuck Mayer
  • LocationNorthern Virginia

Posted November 01 2004 - 02:00 AM

I would. I love the trilogy , and I'm very interested in the extras. I fully expect a single release of the first film, but they won't announce it until after the box set is released. It would hurt sales. Take care, Chuck
Hey buddy...did you just see a real bright light?

#6 of 34 OFFLINE   StephenP


    Stunt Coordinator

  • 211 posts
  • Join Date: May 23 2001

Posted November 17 2004 - 01:12 AM

Any news on this? the review on ign dvd shows a huge difference in these transfers, but I'm not buying the box set.

#7 of 34 OFFLINE   ThomasC


    Lead Actor

  • 6,526 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 15 2001

Posted November 17 2004 - 01:29 AM

If it's released separately, it will not be done until after the set is released.

#8 of 34 OFFLINE   Paul_Stachniak



  • 1,303 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 07 2003

Posted November 17 2004 - 10:45 AM

Its not so much a huge difference - as the fact that the directors went back and recolored the entire first film wo it would match more with the sequels. The new stuff doesnt look bad - however looks too Blue. All the green of the Matrix seems to have dissapeared - but thats from IGN photos. We'll see what happens when the final product comes out.
DVD Collection | Video Game Collection | Live Gamertag: vicodinjunkie

#9 of 34 OFFLINE   Aaryn Chan

Aaryn Chan

    Supporting Actor

  • 511 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 05 2002

Posted November 17 2004 - 03:52 PM

What u mean no green, have u mixed them up?

#10 of 34 OFFLINE   David Ruiz

David Ruiz

    Second Unit

  • 349 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2001

Posted November 17 2004 - 06:19 PM

It sure does. The original release (I'm judging by the pictures on the IGN website) shows absolutely NO signs of edge-enhancement what-so-ever, while the NEW upcoming release (again, judging by the pictures on the IGN site) is drenched with horrible, horrible, horrible, edge-enhancement. If that is the case, I'll keep the original release, thank you very much. I certainly don't want to "upgrade" to a release that has more edge-ehnancement, than the release than I currently have. When are studios going to learn to stop adding edge-enhancement to releases? It only ruins things!

#11 of 34 OFFLINE   Shane Martin

Shane Martin


  • 6,017 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 1999

Posted November 17 2004 - 11:55 PM

Are you sure the EE is being added by Warner? That would be an oddity given Warners history. Warner releases have nearly Zero if any EE in them usually. Looks like I'll be waiting a while for a seperate release.

#12 of 34 OFFLINE   David Ruiz

David Ruiz

    Second Unit

  • 349 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2001

Posted November 18 2004 - 01:52 AM

Well the fact is, that it's there. If Warner didn't add it, then who did?

#13 of 34 OFFLINE   Chad R

Chad R


  • 2,176 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 14 1999
  • Real Name:Chad Rouch

Posted November 18 2004 - 01:59 AM

Perhaps IGN unwittingly added the EE when they transferred the screencaps to JPG files?

#14 of 34 OFFLINE   David Ruiz

David Ruiz

    Second Unit

  • 349 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2001

Posted November 18 2004 - 02:04 AM

It's doubtful. I'm sure that they used the exact same process for both versions to JPG files. The EE simply does not show up on the regular edition, where as on the new edition it looks horrendous. I'll try to make a comparison photo, comparing both, side by side.

#15 of 34 OFFLINE   David Ruiz

David Ruiz

    Second Unit

  • 349 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2001

Posted November 18 2004 - 02:25 AM

Posted Image

I've taken the liberty of highlighting the important areas that show edge-ehancement. Since most people don't know what edge-ehancement is, or what it looks like, the arrows that I have added to the images will make it easier for them to locate the dreaded edge-ehancement on the new release.

#16 of 34 OFFLINE   Rich Malloy

Rich Malloy


  • 3,999 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 09 2000

Posted November 18 2004 - 03:14 AM

WOW, the edge-enhancement sucks even worse than the color re-correction! That cinches it. I'm not downgrading my original Matrix DVD for this. And as for "Reloaded" (which I like much better than many of you), it won't look nearly as good as it does on HD (even cropped), and I've given "Revolutions" it's second and last viewing. I think I'll sit tight for now, and wait for Blu-ray.
"Only one is a wanderer;
Two together are always going somewhere."

#17 of 34 OFFLINE   Patrick Soucy

Patrick Soucy

    Second Unit

  • 277 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 18 2003

Posted November 18 2004 - 04:28 AM

Yeah... But you study the pictures quality from zoomed screen captures in jpeg... The look of that will be a little different in a TV screen.

#18 of 34 OFFLINE   David Ruiz

David Ruiz

    Second Unit

  • 349 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2001

Posted November 18 2004 - 04:40 AM

That's the only real way to tell what it'll look like on a larger screen HDTV. I myself own a 65" Widescreen HDTV, and I also own a FP with a widescreen size of 127 inches. The EE from the new version will make the DVD completely unwatchable on my FP.

Besides, the color change is just as hideous. There is absolutely no reason to "upgrade" to the new release.

Color Change + EE = No Sale!

Posted Image Posted Image

#19 of 34 OFFLINE   Nick T Robot

Nick T Robot

    Supporting Actor

  • 563 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 22 2003

Posted November 18 2004 - 05:15 AM

What's a good way to capture still from a DVD? The still from IGN of the original release look VERY green to me, I'll need to check at home, but I didn't think the Matrix scenes looked THAT green.

#20 of 34 OFFLINE   Grant H

Grant H


  • 2,844 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 24 2002

Posted November 18 2004 - 06:21 AM

What's funny is that one of the complaints from the W's about the original release was that it was too bright, but the new one looks brighter. Well, if they're very technical, they may be correct. The new transfer probably has increased black levels (as most reissues do), but the contrast seems WAY higher on the new version. Check out Smith's papers. I can only imagine how blinding the "white room"/"Welcome to the GAP" scene is going to be. It will probably blow out a lot of monitors. Especially those with factory/torch settings. I don't remember it looking ANYTHING like that in theaters. Anything in the Matrix was greenish and muted. Anyone else getting sick of everybody re-doing original works to look/sound like subsequent ones instead of making the subsequent works look/sound like the originals? As if the sequels didn't tarnish The Matrix enough now it's not even going to look like the same movie? If only the original release had been 2-disc, it would have been less compressed and would still likely hold up to some of today's best transfers. p.s. It looks to me like any apparent increase in EE is just because the new coloring and contrast settings make it more obvious. I see signs of EE on the old cap too. This could all be from the screencap processing. Speaking of great WB transfers, anyone see Smallville Season 3. Beautiful. No signs of EE and you can see the fuzz on people's ears! Amazing detail.
My midis bring all the Force to the yard; my midis are better than yours!

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users