Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

Twin 1804 IB up and running! Need some BFD suggestions!


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 of 32 OFFLINE   Chris Brock

Chris Brock

    Second Unit



  • 328 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 13 2003

Posted October 11 2004 - 12:11 AM

Well on saturday I finally mounted the drivers in their baffle. i went ahead and stuck on some music and began to listen. now Everything you have ever heard about IB bass is 110% true!!!!!!!!!! I literally sat there for about 3 hours listening to different music and movies. There was such a depth, clearity and effortlessness to everything that I kept getting chills in my spine. Let it be known that I am now a converted IB believer and I will never have any boxed sub in my system again. I am going to get everything cleaned up tonight and get some pics up.

Now on to some questions.................
I got my first measurements last night. Here is a graph of the correted numbers I got from a Rat Shack meter....

Posted Image

as you can see I have some problems haha! I have two dips at 18hz and 45hz. Below 18hz the response actually climbs again. I was still hitting over 85db at 10hz. I thought I would start out with bringing that big hump between 25 and 35hz down then boosting the dip around 45hz. the one that I am concerned about is that dip at 18hz. I am afraid to really put any boost on that. What do you guys think and does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks a ton!!

#2 of 32 OFFLINE   Seth_L

Seth_L

    Screenwriter



  • 1,553 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 05 2002

Posted October 11 2004 - 01:09 AM

The BFD won't let you boost frequencies below 20Hz if I recally correctly. It doesn't brickwall at 20Hz, but you can't set a filter with a 18Hz center frequency. Did you have your main speakers on when you measured this data?

#3 of 32 OFFLINE   Chris Brock

Chris Brock

    Second Unit



  • 328 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 13 2003

Posted October 11 2004 - 01:46 AM

yes the mains were on and the xover was set at 80hz. I forgot about the BFD not going below 20hz. that kinda rules that one out then. I would like to keep some rise in the area around 20 - 40hz because i think it really helps to add some excitment to movies, but right now it sounds overly exagerated.

#4 of 32 OFFLINE   ThomasW

ThomasW

    Screenwriter



  • 2,282 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 06 1999

Posted October 11 2004 - 03:16 AM

Hi,

Glad you're happy with the quality of IB bass ...Posted Image

First you don't want to try and boost room induced nulls. Doing that is a physical impossibility. Pull down the peaked frequencies on either side of the nulls, to create the flattest response possible.

One can boost below 20Hz with the Behringer. It will actually go below 5Hz, but that's only by using a very wide filter centered at 20Hz

#5 of 32 OFFLINE   Chris Brock

Chris Brock

    Second Unit



  • 328 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 13 2003

Posted October 11 2004 - 04:11 AM

ok, so would it make sense then to use some filters in the 20 - 40hz range to bring the response down to around the 90db mark to start with? and also do the same for the frequencies above 45hz? does this at least sound like a start? and thomas, Ill get some pics of the installation that you can add to the cult gallery. I would also be very happy to give auditions to anyone interested. what would i need to do to get added to your list on the cult?

#6 of 32 OFFLINE   ThomasW

ThomasW

    Screenwriter



  • 2,282 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 06 1999

Posted October 11 2004 - 04:55 AM

Yes those cuts are a good place to start. Remember that you can fine tune things. Use a wide broadband filter to flatten a big area, Then use a narrow filter inside the same frequency region to boost little dips. Usually ultra flat response isn't needed and frequently sounds a bit dull. You can email the pics as attachments to infinitelybaffled at comcast dot net. Include an email address for people to contact you and I'll post it to the list on the auditions page

#7 of 32 OFFLINE   Chris Brock

Chris Brock

    Second Unit



  • 328 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 13 2003

Posted October 11 2004 - 05:36 AM

awesome! i will definitly play with the BFD over the next few days and hopefully I can get that curve to look alot nicer. You can also expect to see an email in the next few days with information that you would. Thanks!

#8 of 32 OFFLINE   Seth_L

Seth_L

    Screenwriter



  • 1,553 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 05 2002

Posted October 11 2004 - 06:19 AM

You might want to try unplugging your main speakers and graphing again. You might find out that the null by 45Hz is from cancellation with your main speakers.

#9 of 32 OFFLINE   BrianAe

BrianAe

    Second Unit



  • 441 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 02 2002

Posted October 11 2004 - 08:22 AM

I've done a lot of reading about IB over the last year and this post finally leads me to ask a question, I hope no one will be offended. For all the reports of the greatness of IB subs, I have noticed the in-room FR graphs of people with IBs in place tend to be all over the place, way worse than most people who post their box sub FR graphs (after proper placement of course). Many people seem to struggle with getting a flat response even after using eq. Are IB subs especially hard to integrate? What makes the FR so "bumpy" for so many people? I would think that a FR like the one Chris posted above would negate most if not all of the benefits that an IB would have over a good traditional box sub. Please keep in mind that I greatly admire all of you (including Chris) who take on projects like this. I am not trying to attack you. I merely want to learn more...

#10 of 32 OFFLINE   ThomasW

ThomasW

    Screenwriter



  • 2,282 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 06 1999

Posted October 11 2004 - 10:15 AM

Not really. If placement is in some obscure place in the room then lower XO points will need to be used You maybe seeing more info posted about fine-tuning IB's; since the people that go to the time and trouble to build them tend to really fixate on optimizing the performance. IB's are no better or no worse than any other sub when it comes to in-room placement/response. Chris' plot doesn't look significantly better or worse than the dozens of box sub plots I've seen people post. His plot basically looks pretty normal for a non-EQ'd sub of any kind. Unlike 'portable' subs they can't be moved for optimal placement, that's why all potential IB owners are encouraged to check placement prior to cutting any holes. If the proposed placement will work, then the owner is in for a treat given the superior performance an IB provides. I realize this info is difficult to comprehend, but IB subs are really in a different league when compared to 'box' designs. And words aren't adequate to the task of describing the differences. Once one has heard an IB sub all other subs (excluding dipoles) are just pretty 'average'. In the 4yrs we've had the "cult' forum running, no one has abandoned their IB due to them being unhappy with the performance.

#11 of 32 OFFLINE   Cam McFarland

Cam McFarland

    Supporting Actor



  • 699 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 06 2004

Posted October 11 2004 - 12:33 PM

Why would a dual 1804 IB have such low db levels, or was this just readings at a low volume level? Posted Image

#12 of 32 OFFLINE   Chris Brock

Chris Brock

    Second Unit



  • 328 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 13 2003

Posted October 11 2004 - 11:47 PM

Cam, yes that graph was at no where near max output. I was simply looking to estabilish a response curve. The only scene that I have actually metered at max output levels is the scene at the begining of FOTR where Sauron's fingers are cut off and he explodes or whatever, haha. During that energy burst the meter read right at 118 - 119db. keep in mind that right now I am still running this off of a single Nady XA900 amp which is only showing each sub somewhere around 300 - 320wrms. Posted Image So if I go up to around 700wrms per sub (as I have planned) I should be able to get another 3 - 4db out of it. The scary thing was that during that scene even at that level you could hardly see the cones of the drivers moving at all, you had to actually touch them to really know they were even working. amazing!!!

#13 of 32 OFFLINE   Darren_T

Darren_T

    Second Unit



  • 494 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 01 2001

Posted October 12 2004 - 05:29 AM

Glad to hear you are another happy IB convert. I'm in the middle of making the leap myself. I'm trying to decide whether to use four DB PL15D4's or two BP 18's when the new line comes out. Did you go through this decision process? If so could you explain what led you to your current decision to go with what I assume is one IB with two 18" drivers. Also, sounds like you have great SPL... how big is the room? Is it open to the rest of the house? Thanks!

#14 of 32 OFFLINE   Chris Brock

Chris Brock

    Second Unit



  • 328 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 13 2003

Posted October 12 2004 - 06:43 AM

Hey Darren! Thanks for the comments. Actually I originally bought a single 1804 and was intending to use it in a large ported box. While the spl was outstanding the sq just was basically not very good. so I decided to take the plunge and buy a second 1804 and do an IB setup. The room is 19 x 21 x 8 so it is around 3100 - 3200 sq feet. The spl measurement from the LOTR soundtrack was taken right as the amp was begining to clip. Somthing else that was awesome about that scene was the part where sauron's finger hits the ground. when it hits you dont really hear alot of bass but the couch and chairs just shake as though someone hit them from behind. Even my wife kept wanting me to rewind it over and over haha.

#15 of 32 OFFLINE   Darren_T

Darren_T

    Second Unit



  • 494 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 01 2001

Posted October 12 2004 - 06:45 AM

Nice! I just learned that the 1804 is pretty much not an option as they aren't coming back Posted Image I wonder if four 15" drivers would be similar. I suppose it would.

I'm still researching etc but have the go ahead from the wife when the right deal on drivers comes along.

#16 of 32 OFFLINE   ThomasW

ThomasW

    Screenwriter



  • 2,282 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 06 1999

Posted October 12 2004 - 06:55 AM

Not only are the BP1804's gone forever. The DB Drive woofers are disappearing rapidly at the less than $150ea pricing. 4-15"s will have more displacement than 2-18"s, if the Xmax is similar There is a new company starting up that will be offering a new high excursion, high power handling 18". They'll be approx $400ea. Nice thing is that they have licensed Adires' XBL^2 technology. Here are some preliminary T/S parameters for that new 18" Fs 16 Hz Qms 6.0 Qes .429 Qts .40 Vas 550 Liters Re 3.2 ohms Znom 4 ohms Xmax no less than 27mm one-way Sd 1210

#17 of 32 OFFLINE   Darren_T

Darren_T

    Second Unit



  • 494 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 01 2001

Posted October 12 2004 - 07:03 AM

A tad too rich for my blood. I'm trying to stick to $600 and below for the drivers. Sounds like the longer I wait the more screwed I am. Where can you find the DB 15" drivers for $150.00? I can only find them for $166. Any other sweet deals on drivers on the horizon that you see coming Thomas?

#18 of 32 OFFLINE   ThomasW

ThomasW

    Screenwriter



  • 2,282 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 06 1999

Posted October 12 2004 - 07:12 AM

Nothing new will be as cheap as the DB Drive 15"s

http://order.store.y....SAZg3o3KwGJHcI

http://order.store.y....Zk6lNjmPTcvCg-

#19 of 32 OFFLINE   Chris Brock

Chris Brock

    Second Unit



  • 328 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 13 2003

Posted October 12 2004 - 07:23 AM

Thomas, has anyone really looked at Resonant Enginering driver or at Digital Designs drivers for IB use? I think they would have some drivers that might have potential. The RE HE series might be a good solution but also a little pricier.

#20 of 32 OFFLINE   ThomasW

ThomasW

    Screenwriter



  • 2,282 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 06 1999

Posted October 12 2004 - 07:28 AM

Chris, I'm sure RE's designs would be fine. I'm not familar with Digital Designs. Do you have a URL?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users