-

Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo

Tempest enclosure measurements?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
13 replies to this topic

#1 of 14 Dave George

Dave George

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 71 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 06 1999

Posted January 24 2001 - 01:19 PM

I'm deciding upon the final plans for my dual tempest sub, and came across this post by Dan Wiggins on HTT from a while ago:


"OK, here's yet another design to kick around... You know, I just come up with these, like I'm a speaker designer or something...
For good "tight" sound, a Q of 0.577 is often used. It's maximally flat in terms of phase rotation (group delay). But, for home theater, you want a pretty low Fc (down around 20 Hz or so). So, how about this:
175L per Tempest
64 ounces of stuffing
Tune to 17.5 Hz (4"ID by 13"L vent; note that our 4" flared vent kit would work well here - yes, that's a shameless plug... )

You'll have a response that:

Has an F3 anechoic of 22 Hz with the typical LFE crossover.

Is power limited to 500W above 15 Hz (for linear operation).

Mimics a 3rd order Q=0.577 Fc=20 Hz filter to +/- 0.25 dB down to 13 Hz.

Should provide a typical in-room F3 around 17 Hz.

Is capable of more than 110 dB SPL from 16 Hz and up, anechoic.

Is capable of more than 118 dB SPL from 17 Hz and up, in a typical room.

How does that design sound? Yeah, it's different again, but should be a good combination between tight articulate bass for music, and smack-you-upside-the-head SPL capability...

Dan Wiggins
Adire Audio"

The sub will be for 50% music, 50% HT. Any comments on this design?

Dave

#2 of 14 Dave George

Dave George

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 71 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 06 1999

Posted January 29 2001 - 01:44 PM

Anyone?

#3 of 14 Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul

  • 37,665 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted January 29 2001 - 02:01 PM

Dave, you heard it from the horse's mouth. Dan designed the Tempest, so you'd think he'd know how best to utilize it with the goals in mind. Go for it!


------------------
PatCave ; HT Pix ; Gear ; Sunosub I + III ; DVDs ; LDs
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#4 of 14 Hank Frankenberg

Hank Frankenberg

    Screenwriter

  • 2,573 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 13 1998

Posted January 29 2001 - 11:25 PM

Dave, this is EXACTLY the sonosub that I just finished building! I took that post by Dan and designed my sonosub around it. 6.2 Liters, 17.5 Hz tune. I just fired it up and it is utterly amazing! I wasn't going to post until I developed my pictures and scanned them to post with my words (may take several days), but since you referred to Dan's design post, I just had to comment. In a word (or 2), IT WORKS Posted Image. No measurements, I'm breaking it in. No critical music test yet, but I will. BTW, I attached an enclosure to the side and mounted the Adire 250-watt amp to it so it's one structure. Go for it...

#5 of 14 Hank Frankenberg

Hank Frankenberg

    Screenwriter

  • 2,573 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 13 1998

Posted January 29 2001 - 11:27 PM

OOPS! Make that 6.2 ft^3 Posted Image.

#6 of 14 John LaB

John LaB

    Agent

  • 27 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 10 2001

Posted October 21 2001 - 12:01 PM

Yes! After reading just about all of the 195 posts that match 'Tempest', I think this is the design I am going with.

Seems to be perfect for my application. I know this post is about 9 months old, but I wanted to bump it up and see if anyone else has gone with it?

I'm off to order my tempest.

-jpl

#7 of 14 Dan M~

Dan M~

    Second Unit

  • 353 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 30 2000

Posted October 22 2001 - 01:13 AM


Is'nt a 4" port small for this driver?

-Dan

------------------

-Dan M~


My Small Collection


-Dan M~

 

 


#8 of 14 Isaac C

Isaac C

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 142 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 01 2000

Posted October 22 2001 - 02:01 AM

Dan M~, you're right that a 4" port is rather small for the Tempest, but not so in this case because a flared port was specified, which as you might already know reduces port noise Posted Image

------------------
Subwoofer Simulator

Factor Conversion Tool
Subwoofer/Crossover Simulator

Factor Conversion Tool

#9 of 14 Hank Frankenberg

Hank Frankenberg

    Screenwriter

  • 2,573 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 13 1998

Posted October 22 2001 - 04:25 AM

Dave and John, there's a picture (sorry for the low resolution) on my Geocities page: http://www.geocities...d1/My_page.html
Dan - no, the 4" port is fine. Dan Wiggins has posted many times about 4" being sufficient, despite some die-hard opinions out there. The quilifier is of course that the port tube be DUAL-flared (flare on each end of the tube). Wiggins pointed out that the "effective" diameter is that of the flare ends, which is 6". I hear no port noise on my sub.


[Edited last by Hank Frankenberg on October 22, 2001 at 11:29 AM]

#10 of 14 Jack Gilvey

Jack Gilvey

    Producer

  • 4,952 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 13 1999

Posted October 22 2001 - 04:46 AM

Also, when considering port size, you've also got to consider power. If "only" 250 watts is used, folks have done fine with one 4" dual-flared. Also, while port noise will likely be alleviated or reduced by the flares, high-level port compression which might occur wouldn't really be "noticed" as such unless compared to a similar design with more porting.

------------------
Posted Image
SVS Customer Service
http://www.svsound.com
sales@svsound.com
techsupport@svsound.com

#11 of 14 DanWiggins

DanWiggins

    Second Unit

  • 325 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 15 1999

Posted October 23 2001 - 12:10 PM

Another issue with the use of smaller vents at low frequencies is the power sepctrum of the signal. It's very rare to find levels above -10 dBFS down below 18 Hz or so. As such, the delivered power down low is considerably less than the 25-50 Hz range. Less power down low means less swept volume down low, meaning less issue with port compression down low.

Dan Wiggins
Adire Audio

#12 of 14 CarlDais

CarlDais

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 56 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 24 2000

Posted October 24 2001 - 01:00 AM

Dan....many months ago you posted a design and a link for John Morris....(John Morris Sonobox file)...Do you still have that? Remember what thread it was under? At the time I was unable to open it. Can you recall the key features or deminsions?

Back to the subject of Vents.
Why to we use Straight vents?
I read once in an old article that perhaps a 6 degree taper (which isn't much) was a good compromise. The article went into much more depth of the principles of fluid dynamics. The salient point made was that a very slight taper and a very smooth internal surface worked best. Another point was a more precise ratio of straight:taper vents. From a commmercial Mfg. point of view this is costly however, form a DYI it might be doable. Any thoughts? I am having a guy at a sheet metal shop (heating and air duct fabrication) make a vent with such a taper.

thanks

#13 of 14 DanWiggins

DanWiggins

    Second Unit

  • 325 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 15 1999

Posted October 25 2001 - 02:58 AM

Carl,

The small tube design? It's still downloadable at http://www.adireaudi...Morris-sono.box , but here's the details:

Two Tempests, isobaric clamshell
115L enclosure volume
20 Hz tuning
Twin 4"ID by 31"L effective vents

Wire each Tempest in series, then parallel the drivers. You'll have a net 8 ohm load. Drive with ~800W into 8 ohms, and corner loaded in a standard IEC room, and with a 2nd order 80 Hz low pass crossover, you should have +/- 3 dB from ~16 Hz to 60 Hz. And at a typical listening distance, you should be in the ~108-112 dB SPL range.

Using a 50" length of 16" tube, you should be able to offset the bottom plate 7" up into the tube, to hide the clamshelled drivers on the bottom. Mount the vents out the top, use 1.5" thick endcaps, and you should be set.

Dan Wiggins
Adire Audio

[Edited last by DanWiggins on October 25, 2001 at 09:59 AM]

#14 of 14 CarlDais

CarlDais

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 56 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 24 2000

Posted October 25 2001 - 07:43 AM

Thanks Dan for your help and assistance.

Any thoughts about the notion of Vents i.e., tapered, straight, flared, exotic flares.....the math in the article and text was 'Greek' & it's been 30+ years since diff-eq. Is this in the realm of gilding lillies and insignificant minutia (that's sorta redundant wasn't it?)...in the big scheme of things?

Thanks once again.