Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

How about a Blade Runner sequel?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
19 replies to this topic

#1 of 20 OFFLINE   Eric Samonte

Eric Samonte

    Screenwriter



  • 1,327 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 31 1999

Posted July 29 2004 - 11:29 AM

U know, Deckard running around offing replicant hunters trying to off him and Rachel.....

#2 of 20 OFFLINE   Rob Gardiner

Rob Gardiner

    Screenwriter



  • 2,950 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 15 2002

Posted July 29 2004 - 11:33 AM

Deckard and Rachel escaped into the hills. They move into a small cabin and have a wise-cracking replicant butler clean up for them. The nextdoor neighbor is nosy and a real pest. Deckard and Rachel go camping but Rachel brings all the appliances along. Hilarity ensues.

#3 of 20 OFFLINE   AndyVX

AndyVX

    Supporting Actor



  • 808 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 02 2000

Posted July 29 2004 - 04:21 PM

Quote:
How about a Blade Runner sequel


Umm, how about NO! Posted Image
Andrew

#4 of 20 OFFLINE   Allan Petersen

Allan Petersen

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 168 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 01 2001

Posted July 29 2004 - 07:17 PM

K. W. Jeter wrote a series of "official" Blade Runner sequels in book form in the 90's. If I recall correctly they were rather poor. Jeter apparently couldn't decide whether to stick to the world of the movie or Philip K. Dick's novel, so the ones I read came out as a weird mish-mash of both.

A movie sequel will probably be even worse.Posted Image

Quote:
Deckard and Rachel escaped into the hills. They move into a small cabin
That part was actually in Jeter's books. Posted Image

#5 of 20 OFFLINE   Terry St

Terry St

    Second Unit



  • 393 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 21 2002

Posted July 29 2004 - 07:57 PM

Maybe a prequel or spin-off about the replicants' offworld adventures... (but nothing like Soldier)

#6 of 20 OFFLINE   Rob Gardiner

Rob Gardiner

    Screenwriter



  • 2,950 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 15 2002

Posted July 30 2004 - 05:26 AM

Allan,

Quote:
Deckard and Rachel escaped into the hills.

THIS part was at the end of the theatrical cut!

#7 of 20 OFFLINE   Allan Petersen

Allan Petersen

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 168 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 01 2001

Posted July 30 2004 - 06:54 AM

I'm well aware of that. I meant the cabin bit as an extension of the theatrical ending.

#8 of 20 OFFLINE   Grant H

Grant H

    Screenwriter



  • 2,844 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 24 2002

Posted July 30 2004 - 07:38 AM

I actually think a series that pre-dated the events in the film would be interesting. (Of course, depending on what you believe would Deckard be in it?) You might actually have to not use Deckard anyway since if you take his character anywhere it leaves nothing for the film. Might get boring with a remorseless cop killing replicants every week. Could be about another Blade Runner, though. Or a series being the universe all its own with Deckard along the lines of Highlander. Maybe Rachel wouldn't come into it until S3 or so.

Total Recall 2070 was pretty close to a Blade Runner series though.
My midis bring all the Force to the yard; my midis are better than yours!

#9 of 20 OFFLINE   DavidPla

DavidPla

    Screenwriter



  • 2,357 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 15 2004

Posted September 29 2008 - 09:20 AM

The writers of Eagle Eye look to be hoping to make a sequel to Blade Runner. It's all just talk for now but something I'm sure the studio would love to capitalize on. I'll just say this.. I'd prefer a sequel than a remake.

Exclusive: Eagle Eye Co-Writers Working on Blade Runner 2 | /Film

#10 of 20 OFFLINE   David Norman

David Norman

    Screenwriter



  • 2,069 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 12 2001
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted September 29 2008 - 04:15 PM

Deckard and Rachael find a house at the top of a mountain and eventually have a daughter. Unfortunately, the severe environmental damage causes the magnetic poles to reverse and both Ice Caps to melt covering all of the known world in water. Since the toddler daughter is too young to understand they encode a map back to their home in a 'birthmark' and entrust her to a trustworthy passing scientist to find her a suitable home before their 'clocks' expire since Tyrell hadn't been able to tell them how to prevent their ultimate demise. They eventually die in their mountain home, but the daughter lives on with some indistinct memories of trees and animals ..

Damn, I think I've finally gone completely mad.

#11 of 20 OFFLINE   Will_B

Will_B

    Producer



  • 4,733 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2001

Posted September 30 2008 - 06:45 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant H
I actually think a series that pre-dated the events in the film would be interesting.

That could be a great HBO miniseries. Perhaps if the Battlestar Galactica writers make that spin-off prequel show about how the human race built the cylons (and how their best-intentions went horribly wrong), perhaps that will cover the same material (the same issues). We'll just have to imagine that Caprica is Earth.
"Scientists are saying the future is going to be far more futuristic than they originally predicted." -Krysta Now

#12 of 20 OFFLINE   Will_B

Will_B

    Producer



  • 4,733 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2001

Posted September 30 2008 - 06:52 AM

How about someone remake the out-of-print Westwood Studios adventure game "Blade Runner" that was set at the same time (same month, same week) as the film, but had a different plot.

That was one of the best adventure games ever made, but it had 2-D backgrounds (albeit, lovely ones based on preproduction paintings made for the film) and it only runs on slower Win98 machines I think. Depending on whether you decided to befriend or go after the replicants the game played out differently, and it included familiar faces and new ones. Best of all, it actually told a compelling story, just as fraught with paranoia and identity crises as the film itself.

It needs to be rerendered in full 3D and expanded a bit so that those of us who have played out all 9 endings can play even more.

It was such a great game, I've hung onto one of my older computers just in case I get in the mood to play it again.
"Scientists are saying the future is going to be far more futuristic than they originally predicted." -Krysta Now

#13 of 20 OFFLINE   Richard--W

Richard--W

    Producer



  • 3,527 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 20 2004

Posted October 01 2008 - 02:35 AM

I'd love to see further adventures of the Deckard and Rachel, or adventures of another Blade Runner in the future noir created by Ridley Scott. Deckard was not the only Blade Runner, and Harrison Ford is not the only actor who can play him. The story possibilities are endless. In view of the success of the original film, its ongoing popularity, its acceptance in other mediums (novels, games, comics etc), and the intensity of consumer interest it's a waste not to turn Blade Runner into a cinema franchise.

#14 of 20 OFFLINE   John Dirk

John Dirk

    Second Unit



  • 412 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2000

Posted October 01 2008 - 03:00 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyVX
Umm, how about NO! Posted Image

Agreed. Some things are better left alone.

John
"The names Francis Sawyer, but everybody calls me "Psycho."
Any of YOU guys call ME Francis, and I'll kill ya!"

My Home Theater
My BlogMy Travels

#15 of 20 OFFLINE   ErichH

ErichH

    Screenwriter



  • 1,167 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 01 2001

Posted October 01 2008 - 03:11 AM

And I thought the crushing of Alien was the lowest depth.

Please NO

#16 of 20 OFFLINE   Richard--W

Richard--W

    Producer



  • 3,527 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 20 2004

Posted October 01 2008 - 04:01 AM

How about YES .

#17 of 20 OFFLINE   Jeff

Jeff

    Supporting Actor



  • 950 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted October 11 2008 - 04:21 PM

No, leave it alone. People just love to have too much of a good thing and then they destroy it.

#18 of 20 OFFLINE   Edwin-S

Edwin-S

    Producer



  • 5,717 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 20 2000

Posted October 11 2008 - 05:17 PM

Forget it. BLADE RUNNER is perfect......just as long as I ignore Ridley Scott's revisionism. There is no need for a sequel.

And I guess I'm probably one of the few that actually liked SOLDIER. IIRC, no cracking wise in that film, just a pissed off supersoldier doing what he does best: killing the enemy.

Edit: Had to put a space in there. I keep forgetting Blade Runner was two words not one.
"You bring a horse for me?" "Looks like......looks like we're shy of one horse." "No.......You brought two too many."

#19 of 20 OFFLINE   mattCR

mattCR

    Executive Producer



  • 10,066 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2005
  • Real Name:Matt
  • LocationOverland Park, KS

Posted October 11 2008 - 06:20 PM

You know, I'm not really opposed to a sequel.

However, if the idea is to capture this kind of feel, which is really a short story turned into a movie, why don't they find something else.

They could get the same dark, brooding kind of feel by adapting something like "I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream", which I always think of when I watch Blade Runner for some reason.

Then again, that may be a bit -too- dark, but I always thought that could be a great film.
trakt.tv

Ask Me about HTPC! (Threads in HTPC / PMs always responded to)

This signature is povided by MediaBrowser 3 Trakt Plugin: Media Browser 3


#20 of 20 OFFLINE   Rex Bachmann

Rex Bachmann

    Screenwriter



  • 1,975 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 10 2001
  • Real Name:Rex Bachmann

Posted October 13 2008 - 10:16 AM

Richard--W wrote (post #13):

Quote:
In view of the success of the original film, its ongoing popularity, its acceptance in other mediums (novels, games, comics etc), and the intensity of consumer interest it's a waste not to turn Blade Runner into a cinema franchise.

If I remember correctly, the "original film" was considered a disappointment at the box office, and had mixed critical reviews, as well, not unlike many another latter-day "classic" (e.g., The Wizard of Oz (1939), 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)), despite whatever success they may find in the so-called "ancillary-market" afterlife.

mattCR wrote (post #19):

Quote:
. . . if the idea is to capture this kind of feel, which is really a short story turned into a movie, why don't they find something else[?]

"It's too much like right," as we used to say. Everything put into production by the "majors" these days has to be preänalyzed for its marketability. Overpaid, risk-averse execs rely on their marketing departments in order to make up their minds and marketeers support what they feel is easiest for them to market. Ergo, a "presold brand" (a.k.a. "name recognition") is now generally de rigeur. (Marketeer drone: "We'll sell 1.5 mill more tickets the first week with the 'Blade Runner'-label than with a 'I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream'-moniker, which nobody knows or can remember, C.R. And the licencing fee for the dolls---oops!---'action-figures' will be 50% higher." CR: "It's got heat! It's got numbers! Go with it!")

Edwin-S wrote (post #18):

Quote:
BLADERUNNER is perfect....... There is no need for a sequel.

And there never is.

"Delenda est . . . . "

 



Back to Movies (Theatrical)



Forum Nav Content I Follow