Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Best King Arthur film?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
55 replies to this topic

#1 of 56 Rob Gardiner

Rob Gardiner

    Screenwriter

  • 2,950 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 15 2002

Posted June 28 2004 - 03:00 PM

Title says it all. Can anyone recommend a good film based upon the Arthurian legends?

#2 of 56 BrionL

BrionL

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 223 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 05 2004

Posted June 28 2004 - 03:04 PM

Excalibur.

Brion

#3 of 56 Britton

Britton

    Supporting Actor

  • 904 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 03 2001

Posted June 28 2004 - 03:29 PM

Monty Python and the Holy Grail

#4 of 56 Ernest Rister

Ernest Rister

    Producer

  • 4,148 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2001

Posted June 28 2004 - 03:54 PM

Excalibur and Monty Python. The only two even worth renting, as far as I'm concerned. You're actually just better off reading the Arthurian tales of T.H. White.

#5 of 56 Andrew Priest

Andrew Priest

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 79 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 01 2004

Posted June 28 2004 - 05:56 PM

I'd give another vote for Excalibur. I have a fondness for the film. I don't even criticize the anachronistic armor anymore. Certainly the film has its moments of glory.

Though I don't know if Camelot is so terrible as to not even rent. Yeah, I remember it being pretty mediocre, but I don't recall being annoyed that I had rented it. Perhaps though it was because I was younger. First Knight was pretty banal. Hell, the more I think of it the less I want to. Merlin was all over the place not to mention a mini-series, and I haven't seen Mists of Avalon so I can't comment. Hmm, there was Sword of the Valiant: The Legend of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, another movie I'm trying to forget. I have not seen Sword in the Stone since I was but a wee little person, so I'm blank there.

Monty Python and the Holy Grail speaks for itself. But it's almost odd that such a central myth of western culture has never had a uncompromised telling in film. Perhaps it's just inherently difficult to tell. Though that does nothing to explain First Knight. Perhaps there has been too strong an urge to tinker with the mythology in really inane ways. I'm not exactly bursting with confidence regarding the new film, though I thought the sword on the poster was an interesting example.
I am a nice shark, not a mindless eating machine. If I am to change this image, I must first change myself. Fish are friends, not food.

#6 of 56 Andy Sheets

Andy Sheets

    Screenwriter

  • 2,371 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 06 2000

Posted June 28 2004 - 11:35 PM

Monty Python. I also agree with reading TH White's stuff Posted Image

#7 of 56 Sam Favate

Sam Favate

    Producer

  • 4,734 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 03 2004
  • Real Name:Sam Favate

Posted June 28 2004 - 11:53 PM

Excalibur is my favorite, by far. (Still waiting for a better DVD version!)

Monty Python & the Holy Grail is also excellent, but is hardly a telling of the legend; more like a comedy set in that era.

That's it. For other sources, I recommend T.H. White's writings, and the DC Comics graphic novel Camelot 3000 by Mike Barr & Brian Bolland.

I don't have much faith in the new Jerry Bruckehimer version. (For one thing, why is Guinivere wearing a bikini in the poster??)

#8 of 56 TheLongshot

TheLongshot

    Producer

  • 4,119 posts
  • Join Date: May 12 2000

Posted June 29 2004 - 03:21 AM

I'll give "The Mists Of Avalon" miniseries an honorable mention, because it is a nice alternate view on Arthurian legend.

"Excalibur" is still the definitive Arthur...

Jason

#9 of 56 Rob Gardiner

Rob Gardiner

    Screenwriter

  • 2,950 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 15 2002

Posted June 29 2004 - 03:29 AM

Thanks, everyone. Posted Image

#10 of 56 Todd K

Todd K

    Second Unit

  • 479 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 21 2001

Posted June 29 2004 - 05:48 AM

There's one of these in every thread, and this time it's from me -- after reading the title too quickly, I thought the subject was "Best Bea Arthur Film."

#11 of 56 david stark

david stark

    Second Unit

  • 256 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 24 2003

Posted June 29 2004 - 11:01 AM

Quote:
Monty Python and the Holy Grail

This has to be the best. OK so it's not exactly a very serious film, but my favourite comedy of all time.

Quote:
I don't have much faith in the new Jerry Bruckehimer version. (For one thing, why is Guinivere wearing a bikini in the poster??)

I suspected this thread had been started to see if there was anything to compare the soon to be released King Arthur against. I saw a trailer for it in the cinema and it all looked to be going ok until Mr Deep Voiceover said something like -

"Before Guinivere was a queen she was a warrior" - cut to Guinivere in a bikini or something with a bow and arrow. At this point I had to restrain myself from rolling around the floor in fits of laughter, almost funnier than the quest for the holy grail (but not quite).

#12 of 56 Craig S

Craig S

    Producer

  • 5,454 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 04 2000
  • Real Name:Craig Seanor
  • LocationLeague City, Texas

Posted June 29 2004 - 11:05 AM

Excalibur, without a doubt. And I don't see that changing anytime soon.
Quote:
I thought the subject was "Best Bea Arthur Film."
Now that would be the "Star Wars Holday Special".

Posted Image

Three truths about movies, as noted by Roger Ebert:

 

* It's not what a movie is about, it's how it is about it.

* No good movie is too long, and no bad movie is short enough.

* No good movie is depressing, all bad movies are depressing.


#13 of 56 Jim_K

Jim_K

    Executive Producer

  • 10,089 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 07 2000

Posted June 29 2004 - 11:23 AM

For serious films Excalibur, easily.

For laughs:

either intentional - Monty Python and the Holy Grail

or unintentional Lancelot du lac Posted Image
Death before Streaming!


#14 of 56 Ernest Rister

Ernest Rister

    Producer

  • 4,148 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2001

Posted June 29 2004 - 02:46 PM

"I have not seen Sword in the Stone since I was but a wee little person, so I'm blank there."

Strong characters, and one marvelous scene (the Wizards Duel) -- but no story. The movie just ambles from sequence to sequence. Wart learns its good to use your head, Wart learns love is a powerful force -- but he never uses any of this knowledge later in the movie. He doesn't need to know how to outsmart his enemies or appreciate the power of love to pull the sword from the stone. He never uses this knowledge to overcome an obstacle in the last act. It's like watching the education of the Karate Kid, and then never seeing him use karate. The ending is particularly weak, as the movie simply stops. The last shot is supposed to be a parody of a then-current television commercial, but that factoid is lost on audiences 40 years later.

Sword in the Stone is perhaps the weakest Disney animated feature produced while Walt was still alive. The film has its supporters, but of the animated features Walt actually produced, I'd place this at the bottom.

#15 of 56 Scott Weinberg

Scott Weinberg

    Lead Actor

  • 7,482 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 03 2000

Posted June 29 2004 - 03:00 PM

Lemme know when you create a "Worst King Arthur movie" thread. I saw one today that deserves a mention.

#16 of 56 Ray H

Ray H

    Producer

  • 3,471 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 13 2002
  • Real Name:Ray
  • LocationNJ

Posted June 29 2004 - 03:30 PM

I saw Camelot a few months ago. As far as I'm concerned, it was pretty bad. Even the songs were annoying. "GUENIVEEERE! GUENIVEEEEEEEEEERE! When will Lanc-el-ot cometosave GUENIVEEEEEEEEERE?!!!"

I was so disappointed that I thought to myself "Wouldn't it be great if they made a definitive King Arthur movie. Excalibur was good. But this could be a really cool retelling with all the action and magic of the tale. Kinda like Excalibur. The fight between Arthur and Mordred could be amazing! Kinda like in Excalibur....." Then I finally realized how much I actually liked Excalibur. Posted Image

I'd also recommend Mists of Avalon as a pretty good King Arthur flick.
"Here's looking at you, kid."

 


#17 of 56 Ernest Rister

Ernest Rister

    Producer

  • 4,148 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2001

Posted June 29 2004 - 10:17 PM

"As far as I'm concerned, it was pretty bad. Even the songs were annoying."

The stage musical is a lot of fun, and the Lerner and Lowe tunes are wonderful. One of my favorites, actually. The movie suffers from a rather drab look (at least, my old laserdisc did), and for some reason the direction reminds me more of Hair than a magical world of yore. The film version of My Fair Lady seems timeless, while the film version of Camelot seems stuck in the late 60's/early 70's. It deserved better.

It's yet another classic musical that deserves a big-screen remake.

#18 of 56 Joshua_W

Joshua_W

    Second Unit

  • 477 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 22 2003

Posted June 29 2004 - 11:22 PM

The "Mists of Avalon" miniseries does present an interesting take on the Arthurian legend, but the book is much, much better.

Like others have said, "Excalibur" is still the definitive King Arthur movie.

#19 of 56 Amy Mormino

Amy Mormino

    Supporting Actor

  • 537 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 16 2004

Posted June 30 2004 - 12:55 AM

Here's another King Arthur film no one has mentioned: the 1950s movie, "Knights of the Round Table" with Robert Taylor, Ava Gardner, and one of the Ferrers. It is certainly not the best Arthur film, but it is worthwhile if you want to see an extremely sanitized, big budget 1950s version of the legend with Ava as the most beautiful movie Guinevere.

The best King Arthur film is "Excalibur", though. No doubt about it.

#20 of 56 TheLongshot

TheLongshot

    Producer

  • 4,119 posts
  • Join Date: May 12 2000

Posted June 30 2004 - 03:16 AM

Quote:
The "Mists of Avalon" miniseries does present an interesting take on the Arthurian legend, but the book is much, much better.


Oh, I don't argue that, which is why I thought it should be an honorable mention. The mini actually was pretty good for what it was, and at least I thought it was well cast.

Jason


Back to Movies (Theatrical)



Forum Nav Content I Follow