Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Which screen format 1:85 or 1:78 are you using?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
7 replies to this topic

#1 of 8 OFFLINE   Mike V

Mike V

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 89 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 26 2000

Posted May 31 2004 - 12:14 AM

I am in the process of choosing a screen format. I think I will be going with the 1:85 to 1 size at 104" (Carada)but before I do I am hoping to get your feedback on what you are using and if you are happy with your choice. I do not want to be looking for a new screen 6 months after installation... DVD and HD via cable will be the primary viewing sources.

I do plan to make some DIY masking in either case for the screen.

#2 of 8 OFFLINE   Michael TLV

Michael TLV

    Screenwriter



  • 2,909 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 2000
  • Real Name:Michael Chen
  • LocationCalgary, Alberta

Posted May 31 2004 - 07:03 AM

Greetings

Why 1.85:1? Only one film format fits that ratio.

HD is 16:9 ... why not get the format suitable for the most material?

Regards
Michael @ The Laser Video Experience
THX Video Systems Instructor/ISF Instructor
Lion A/V Consultants Network - TLVEXP.com


#3 of 8 OFFLINE   Andrew Pratt

Andrew Pratt

    Producer



  • 3,813 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 08 1998

Posted May 31 2004 - 07:10 AM

There's a reason 16:9 was choosen as the HD format and that's that its the most universal for all the various widescreen formats

#4 of 8 OFFLINE   Mike V

Mike V

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 89 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 26 2000

Posted May 31 2004 - 07:52 AM

Michael,

I am looking at 1:85:1 for the exact reason that it is the standard HD format. The other reason is that there are more movies formated that way than any other.

What would your ideal screen size be?

#5 of 8 OFFLINE   Michael Pineo

Michael Pineo

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 138 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 17 1998

Posted May 31 2004 - 08:30 AM

I think what Michael was getting at is 1.85:1 is not the HD standard. 1.78:1 is the standard, although I have a really hard time telling the difference on my setup. Most HD is indistinguishable from 1.85:1 material. I have a 16x9 screen and 1.85:1 movies come extremely close to filling the screen.

MikeP

#6 of 8 OFFLINE   Andrew Pratt

Andrew Pratt

    Producer



  • 3,813 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 08 1998

Posted May 31 2004 - 08:39 AM

Depending on the overscan of your monitor/projector 1.85 might very well fill the screen but technically your screen's should be 1.78

#7 of 8 OFFLINE   Amano Ai

Amano Ai

    Agent



  • 30 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 19 2002

Posted June 02 2004 - 04:27 AM

1.78, 1.85 anamorphic fits perfectly.

#8 of 8 OFFLINE   Mike V

Mike V

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 89 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 26 2000

Posted June 03 2004 - 07:00 AM

Thanks everyone for the replies. It looks like my choice should be 1:78 rather than 1:85. I mainly want to fill the screen whenever possible and/or avoid having to settle for a smaller picture just so that it fits the screen dimension I choose. This will also allow for a smaller masking system which I would prefer.

FYI: I will be using a Z2.