Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

Battle Of The Bulge Ultra Panavision on HDnet

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 of 11 OFFLINE   Pete SE

Pete SE


  • 32 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 14 2003

Posted May 12 2004 - 10:36 AM

I'm cross posting this here for those interested. It has been reported that Battle Of The Bulge is now in the HDNet rotation in what looks to be its UP70 OAR.

#2 of 11 OFFLINE   Jeff_HR



  • 3,596 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 15 2001

Posted May 12 2004 - 10:43 AM

This post doesn't belong here. Probably should be in Movies section.

In any case, I'd love a SE DVD of this film. Posted Image

Cogito, Ergo Sum
My DVD Library / The BLOOD is the Life!
Pioneer Elite PRO PDP-111FD - 2/28/2009

#3 of 11 OFFLINE   Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford


  • 26,774 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 1998
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMichigan

Posted May 12 2004 - 10:51 AM

For those interested and able to watch this film in HD.


#4 of 11 OFFLINE   Lawrence X

Lawrence X

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 63 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 29 2003

Posted May 13 2004 - 05:48 AM

The picture quality is absolutely astounding for a movie of that (or any) age. It actually looks like it was filmed with high def cameras. Using tht as a master, they should be able to make a gorgous DVD transfer.

#5 of 11 OFFLINE   RobertR


    Lead Actor

  • 9,646 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 19 1998

Posted May 13 2004 - 05:58 AM

Well, that's because it WAS filmed with "high def cameras" (70 mm Ultra Panavision to be exact), and they were capable of MUCH higher resolution than the "high def" that 1920x1080 video is capable of (the claims of a certain director who's abandoned film notwithstanding).

#6 of 11 OFFLINE   Seth Paxton

Seth Paxton

    Lead Actor

  • 7,588 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 05 1998

Posted May 13 2004 - 06:43 AM

Isn't it amazing how distorted the tech companies have been able to make the public understanding of digital technologies. Same with CD of course. Consistant reproduction is one thing, but this whole idea that NOW we have high rez video and audio....sheesh. Not knocking Lawrence, his reaction is actually quite typical. Few people I know realize that even moving film 35mm has better resolution than digital cameras resolve, let alone 70mm film cameras and their larger "capture" area.

#7 of 11 OFFLINE   John*C


    Stunt Coordinator

  • 203 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 08 2003

Posted May 13 2004 - 10:20 AM

Pardon me is this the Robert Shaw/Henry Fonda "Battle of the Bulge"? I have "Battle of the Bulge" on tape with a intermission in the middle, If it is wow they first start out with a real wide 2.35:1 during the opening credits! My tape was made with Dolby Surround even though the pic was made in 1965!

#8 of 11 OFFLINE   RobertR


    Lead Actor

  • 9,646 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 19 1998

Posted May 13 2004 - 10:41 AM


#9 of 11 OFFLINE   Tino


    Lead Actor

  • 6,518 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999
  • Real Name:Valentino
  • LocationMetro NYC

Posted May 13 2004 - 11:17 AM

I caught part of this and noticed how wide it was. What is the OAR anyway? And is the film any good?
It's gonna be a hell of a ride. I'm ready. .

#10 of 11 OFFLINE   RobertR


    Lead Actor

  • 9,646 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 19 1998

Posted May 13 2004 - 11:40 AM

According to the IMDB, It's about as wide as Ben-Hur (2.76:1), based on the combination of being 70 mm AND anamorphic.

#11 of 11 OFFLINE   Ken Koc

Ken Koc

    Supporting Actor

  • 973 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 12 2004

Posted May 13 2004 - 04:09 PM

BATTLE OF THE BULGE was originally released in "Super Cinerama" which was the new 70mm single projector used for Cinerama. I remember it was a special reserved seat attraction at the Center Cinerama theater in San Diego. I still have the program.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users