Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
DVD Reviews

HTF Review: Peter Pan (Recommended)



This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
45 replies to this topic

#1 of 46 Jason Perez

Jason Perez

    Second Unit

  • 310 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 06 2003

Posted April 28 2004 - 01:57 AM



Peter Pan



/htforum/images/coverart/49685.jpg









Studio: Universal

Year: 2003

Rated: PG

Film Length: 114 minutes

Aspect Ratio: Anamorphic Widescreen (2.40:1)

Captions: English

Subtitles: French, and Spanish

Audio: English – Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround; French – Dolby Digital 5.1







Release Date:
May 4th, 2004





For better or worse, when I think of Peter Pan, images of Walt Disney’s interpretation of the character always come to mind. At the risk of sounding like a heretic, I will begin this review by telling you all that I despise the Walt Disney version of Peter Pan for its grating rendition of Wendy, the depiction of the Indians, and because of how ridiculous Captain Hook comes across to me as! Come to think of it, the animated Pan is a real ass in that film as well!

There, I came clean and said it! Sorry, I just had to get it off my chest, but I can promise you that this review will be the better for my dislike of the “Disney classic”, because I do not have a bias towards the animated version that will distort my opinion on the most recent adaptation of J.M. Barrie’s timeless tale, or a preconceived notion of what this Peter Pan should be like. Well, that last part is not entirely true. It should definitely not resemble Steven Spielberg’s downright awful Hook in any way, shape, or form! Posted Image

Anyway, if you are at all familiar with this story, you will not be surprised that P.J. Hogan’s version of Peter Pan chronicles the adventures of the Darling children, and everyone’s favorite “boy who wouldn’t grow up”, as they battle the wicked Captain Hook (Jason Isaacs). As the film opens, we meet George Darling (also played by Jason Isaacs), head of the Darling family, who has thus far been unable to move his career at the bank along the way he would have liked. Mrs. Darling (Olivia Williams), his wife, works hard to keep the home in order, and is completely devoted to her family, but the vile Aunt Millicent (Lynn Redgrave) still manages to find fault with her brand of homemaking and child rearing. And since professes to be quite the society matron, she is bound and determined to provide George with the kick in the rump he needs to advance professionally and raise his children in a manner she deems more “proper”.

To begin with, Millicent insists that the eldest child, Wendy (Rachel Hurd-Wood), be given her own room, and that she refrain from participating in tomboyish games with her brothers. In particular, Millicent is horrified that a young girl is permitted by her parents to engage in imaginary battles with pirates and sleep in the same room as her brothers, when she should be receiving an education in the ways of high society. In her view, it seems that thirteen-year-olds have too much growing up to do to have any fun, especially if they are young girls.

The rest of the clan consists of Wendy’s younger siblings, Michael (Freddie Popplewell) and John (Harry Newell), and their dog Nanna, who serves as a caretaker of sorts. Unbeknownst to any of them, however, a resident of the fantasy realm of Neverland has been watching their actions through their bedroom window, and listening intently to the fanciful tales Wendy enjoys telling to her brothers. This magical youth, named Peter Pan (Jeremy Sumpter) has his eye on Wendy, but before the two can get properly acquainted, Nanna senses his presence, catches his shadow, and imprisons it in a dresser drawer. And as fate would have it, the omnipresent Tinkerbell (Ludivine Sagnier), Peter Pan’s fairy companion, is unable to set her friend’s shadow free.

Subsequently, Peter comes looking for his shadow just as George is set to impose Millicent’s will on the children, and when Wendy catches him, he asks her to come away to Neverland with him. It seems that Peter is looking for a mother figure for his band of “Lost Boys”, and he imagines that Wendy will fit the bill nicely. Since Wendy is not quite ready to grow up the way Aunt Millicent wishes, she seizes this golden opportunity, and flies away to Neverland with Peter, taking Michael and John along with her, courtesy of a little pixie dust provided by Tinkerbell!

Once in Neverland, the Darlings realize that all of the products of their active childish imaginations have become a reality! Initially, this makes the children very happy, as they do not have to repress their imaginations and “grow up”. Soon, however, they discover that the world of Neverland is not without peril, for Peter and his Lost Boys are engaged in constant conflict with the Indian Princess Tiger Lily (Carsen Gray) and her tribe, not to mention always being on the lookout for the dastardly Captain Hook and the pirates of the Jolly Roger. As the kids try to rid Neverland of Hook’s menace, their parents worry themselves silly back home…will they ever return to their grief-stricken parents, or will they refuse to grow up, just as Peter Pan did? I am sure you already know the answer, but I am not going to tell you anyway!!!

With Peter Pan, I think director P.J. Hogan took on a substantial challenge, and came out on the winning end. After all, entertaining children and adolescents can be every bit as tough as entertaining an audience of adults, and takes a filmmaker who knows precisely when and how to ratchet up/dial down a film’s tension and excitement. The infusion of too much frightening or dark material, and you risk giving little tykes nightmares; on the other hand if too little excitement is offered, youngsters’ minds might wander. In this regard, Hogan exhibits quite a degree of skill in juxtaposing the action and semi-romantic elements of this story, and as a result, his spin on this classic fantasy is fraught with danger, excitement, and even a little love.

However, if you are familiar with the Disney version (unfortunately, my little girl loves it! Posted Image ), there are aspects of P.J. Hogan’s film that will throw you for a loop. This is especially true of Jason Isaacs’ characterization of Captain Hook, who is a lot more menacing and ruthless than he has been in any of his previous film incarnations. This Captain Hook, who is far from buffoonish and clumsy, has no tolerance not only for Peter and company, but also for ineptitude amongst his crew. In fact, he does not display the least bit of remorse as he casually guns down crewmembers that fail to pull their weight, or otherwise annoy him in any way. And yet another change is that the offensive “What Makes the Red Man Red” song is gone! Thank goodness for that!!! Posted Image

One thing I was not really surprised by, however, especially given today’s technology, is the dreamy and surreal nature of Peter Pan’s visuals. Come to think of it, even the rendition of early 20th century London had a distinctly dreamlike and unreal quality to it, despite obviously being rooted in reality. The beauty of the various Neverland “locations” is even more undeniable. Though not all the CGI is photo-realistic, I would not say that any looked “fake” enough to be distracting, especially if you allow yourself to be absorbed by the story. For the most part though, this film’s exquisite scenery is a feast for the eyes!

Another really pleasant aspect of this film comes in the form of the delightful performances by the cast. To begin with, Rachel Hurd-Wood is spunky and charming as the heroic Wendy, who is trying desperately to stave of becoming a young woman. Likewise, Jeremy Sumpter does a fantastic job of bringing to life the brash, adventuresome, and mischievous Peter Pan. As unbelievable as this sounds, Sumpter is the first lad ever to play Peter Pan on film, and the confidence he exhibits is remarkable!

The most impressive performance, however, may be that of Jason Isaacs, who is absolutely wonderful as Captain Hook, giving the character the edginess, wit, and menace that he has sorely lacked in the past. This Hook is not only adept with a blade, but he relishes using it, even on his own crew if need be. Indeed, much of the film’s suspense is generated by the way the Hook character was written and portrayed. On the opposite side of the spectrum, P.J. Hogan cast the alluring Ludivigne Sagnier as Peter’s fairy companion Tinkerbell, and after reading the book, her comic facial expressions and body language bring the character to life exactly as I imagined her. The fact that she had the aid of some really powerful computers did not hurt either!

To be sure, like his predecessors (especially Disney) have, P.J. Hogan did take some creative license with Barrie’s story, but he has still managed to stay much more faithful to the original story than the previous cinematic versions of this tale have. The way the film pushes different emotional buttons throughout is also quite fascinating, and makes for a real roller coaster ride – at times suspenseful, at times playful, but in the end a film that is just plain fun, and suitable for all but the tiniest tots.






SO, HOW DOES IT LOOK?
Peter Pan is offered by Universal in its ultra-wide 2.40:1 aspect ratio (anamorphic), and it looks splendid overall! Specifically, whites are clean and brilliant, and black level remains rock solid throughout, without any apparent low level noise. As a result, the image exhibits a lovely texture and sense of three-dimensionality.

In terms of color, the rich earth tones in the Darling household, the colorful solar system (when Peter takes the kids away), and the wonders of Neverland are all reproduced quite accurately. Flesh tones, however, do appear to be slightly overcooked in a few sequences early in the film. Additionally, film grain does not pose a problem, and there is no evidence of digital signature (edge enhancement, artifacts, or other visual abnormalities), so the image has a pleasing film-like appearance. Indeed, from two screen lengths away, even solid-colored backgrounds also appeared to be free of video noise.

About the only problem I had with the image was that fine detail is lost in an apparent softness during some of the interior shots. Close-ups and outdoor scenes, however, look marvelous! On the whole though, if there is anything you don’t like about this release, it shouldn’t be the quality of its visuals. Another very good transfer by the folks at Universal!




WHAT IS THAT NOISE?
Peter Pan’s adventures are brought to life by an energetic and well balanced Dolby Digital 5.1 channel mix, which has a wide, enveloping soundstage. Dialogue is brilliantly rendered, and always easily discernable, even during the action-packed Neverland sequences. Similarly, sonic details, like the tinkling of pixie dust, or the clang of metal whenever characters’ are engaged in swordplay, ring through in a truly natural manner.

The encoded audio is boisterous whenever it needs to be, and the rear channels are quite active, especially when Peter and Hook are doing battle, or when Tinkerbell is buzzing about the screen. Finally, bass response is both powerful and composed, which really puts the listener into the thick of the action. For example, when Captain Hook’s minions fire cannons on Peter and friends (at thirty-one minutes in), a decent sub should get your walls shaking! Unless you live in an apartment or condo with thin walls (been there), or have a wife who gets displeased when pictures get rattled off the wall Posted Image , that is a good thing though!

To sum it up, Peter Pan is given a quality mix by the folks at Universal. Speaking for myself, the smooth panning, balanced frequency response, active surround usage, and powerful low bass sure moved me! Not bad for a “family” film!!! Not bad at all…




EXTRAS, EXTRAS!!!


The wealth of extras is divided across five sections, as follows:

PIRATE SHIP:

Through the Eyes of Captain Hook
In this short featurette, Peter Pan’s Jason Isaacs (Mr. Darling/Captain Hook) takes viewers behind the scenes, often through footage from his own camcorder. There is plenty of footage of Mr. Isaacs hamming it up with co-stars, practicing sword techniques, and undergoing wire training. Not terribly insightful, but it is amusing, and Jason Isaacs appears to be quite a character.


The Lost Pirates’ Song
This extra consists of footage of the cast (pirates) recording a never-before-heard song, and director P.J. Hogan talking about why the song was never filmed, even though Captain Hook’s gang of swashbuckling pirates worked very hard to learn it!


Board the Pirate Ship
This extra offers a look at the process of designing and building the Jolly Roger pirate ship featured in the film. Basically, concept art, models, and set construction are shown over music for just under a minute. Sadly, it took about as long to navigate through menus and sit through loading times as this extra runs for. Posted Image


The Pirates vs. The Lost Boys
The “Pirates vs. The Lost Boys” featurette allows viewers to take an inside look at the relationships between the two groups of characters (for all of two minutes).


DARLING HOUSE:

Alternate Ending
This alternate ending shows Peter checking in on Wendy, who has now grown up! This is only my take on it, of course, but I think it is wise that this ending was scrapped.


Deleted Scenes
The Darlings become distraught when their children go missing, and George opts to confine himself to a doghouse until they return home. Though a little long, it is an amusing scene, with some really funny footage of Mr. Darling traveling around in the doghouse.


Me and My Shadow
In this brief (1-minute) featurette, Lynne Redgrave and Jeremy Sumpter briefly discuss the difficulties of working out a scene where Peter Pan’s shadow causes mimics Aunt Millicent’s actions.


In the Dog House with Nana
In this bonus feature, viewers get to hear from the film’s head animal trainer, who talks about the qualities of the 3 dogs that played Nana in Peter Pan. Though this extra is just about as short as the others, there is some amusing footage of how Nana “makes” the Darling children take a bath, and how the dogs rehearse for scenes. I don’t know why, but I am always a sucker for that stuff.


NEVERLAND FOREST

Tinkerbell: Behind the Fairy Dust
“Behind the Fairy Dust” is a mildly entertaining 4-minute featurette, consisting of interviews with actress Ludivine Sagnier and the crew, who discuss the process of bringing one of the world’s best known fairies to life. Interestingly, it seems that Tinkerbell was to be a completely CG character at one point. Personally, I am glad that did not come to pass.


I Do Believe in Fairies
Wow, we get to visit the magical world of fairies for an entire minute-and-a-half! Hmm, let’s see – that gives us enough time to do nothing! Basically, this valueless featurette consists of behind-the-scenes footage played over music.


Explore the Forest
This feature is billed as an “experience of the process of creating the lush Neverland Forest sets”, but it is really less than a minute of footage of the forest sets and models being built. I think this is a real shame, as these sets were really nice, and it would have been interesting to learn anything about their creation.


Princess Tiger Lily
“Princess Tiger Lily” is another blink-and-its-over featurette, which runs a mere 58 seconds, that introduces viewers to Native-American actress Carsen Gray, who actually speaks the language of her tribe. If you want to know anything more about Carsen than that, you’ll have to track her down, because it is not in here!


THE BLACK CASTLE

Learning to Fly
The “Learning to Fly” featurette (6 minutes) provides a behind-the-scenes look at the flight training the actors were given for the production. In addition to discussions with the actors, there is plenty of behind-the-scenes footage of the actors honing their skills on trampolines and wires.


The Mermaids’ Tale
In my humble opinion, this extra is probably the most worthless on the disc, and that is really saying something. Really, it consists of nothing more than the mermaids, who are in makeup, introducing themselves. This is followed up by an abundance of extremely annoying visual effects and audio tricks that were included for no particular reason.


Enter the Castle
Selecting this bonus allows viewers to glimpse the mysterious castle sets being built, again for barely over a minute, while music plays.


HOME UNDER THE GROUND

The Legacy of Peter Pan
During this 11-minute featurette, Duchess Sarah Ferguson explores the legend of Peter Pan, and outlines the origins of J.M. Barrie’s timeless work of fiction. She also discusses Barrie’s real-life inspiration for the story, the books that preceded it, and some of the previous film incarnations of Barrie’s tale. If you really want to learn a little something about both this film and J.M. Barrie’s classic tale, just spend your time here. Most of the other extras are just window dressing.


Dig Under the House
In this 1-minute featurette, concept drawings and a behind-the-scenes look at the Lost Boys’ secret lair are exhibited, as music plays.


Lost Boys on the Set
You’ve read it before, now read it again (don’t blame me!): This is a two-minute extra that offers almost no insight into the film. Basically, Peter Pan’s boys are given some face time, via interviews (more like sound bytes) about their experiences working on the film, and some behind-the-scenes footage.


The Duchess’ Outtakes
This two-minute series of outtakes features an extremely melodramatic interaction between Fergie and Jason Isaacs, as well as a few choice foul-ups by the Duchess.



SCORE CARD

(on a five-point scale)
Movie: Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image
Video: Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image
Audio: Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image
Extras: Posted Image Posted Image
Overall: Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image



THE LAST WORD
The DVD release of Peter Pan is technically sound, featuring lavish visual imagery and a surprisingly active and engaging Dolby Digital 5.1 channel mix. Unfortunately, however, the majority of the extras are almost completely worthless, as they are largely devoid of either insightful or interesting content. Moreover, most of them will take almost as little time to watch as it does to navigate through the five different menus and select them. Really, this is a good example of how more is not always better, and I would have preferred one or two well thought out and insightful featurettes to the myriad of crappy minute-long bonus features that we have here. On the other hand, if you are afflicted by Attention Deficit Disorder, these extras might be right up your alley! (Insert dead silence after bad joke here!)

Moving on to the film, even though his Peter Pan contains sound performances (the children included) and dazzling special effects work, P.J. Hogan never fails to keep the story, which is the most important element in any film, squarely in focus. Not to directly compare the two, but Hogan achieves on a smaller scale what Peter Jackson achieved in his LOTR trilogy, namely by carefully adapting a classic piece of literature, using technology to serve the story, and by getting the very best out of his cast. As a result, this film has a genuine sense of warmth that is sorely lacking in most modern “family” films.

Therefore, in the final analysis, if you are looking for a movie to watch with the little ones I can recommend this DVD, despite the generally disappointing nature of the extras. Quite simply, this is a fine family film, and Universal has endowed it with a great transfer (for the most part) and soundtrack. Now all I have to do is steer my daughter towards this version, and away from the Disney version! Posted Image


Stay tuned…
Padawan Learner in the Mystical Art of Home Theater!

Display Tweaked to Perfection by Calibrator Extraordinaire Gregg Loewen!

#2 of 46 Jeff Rogers

Jeff Rogers

    Second Unit

  • 311 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 24 2000

Posted April 28 2004 - 02:21 AM

The cover art... oh god..

The cover art...

It haunts me Posted Image
" Maam....maybe you don't understand, you ripped my clients arm off "

#3 of 46 Paul_Scott

Paul_Scott

    Lead Actor

  • 6,546 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 18 2002

Posted April 28 2004 - 02:36 AM

thanks Jason.

missed this at the theater but i'm looking forward to catching it on dvd.

#4 of 46 Stephen_J_H

Stephen_J_H

    Producer

  • 3,862 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 30 2003
  • Real Name:Stephen J. Hill
  • LocationNorth of the 49th

Posted April 28 2004 - 04:11 AM

Even if it's soft, it'll look better than it did @ the local discount theatre...
"My opinion is that (a) anyone who actually works in a video store and does not understand letterboxing has given up on life, and (b) any customer who prefers to have the sides of a movie hacked off should not be licensed to operate a video player."-- Roger Ebert

#5 of 46 Jason Perez

Jason Perez

    Second Unit

  • 310 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 06 2003

Posted April 28 2004 - 05:18 AM

Stephen,

I can pretty much guarantee that it will look better on your HT setup. By the way, don't you just love those theaters? Especially the way they smell... Posted Image

Regards,

Jason
Padawan Learner in the Mystical Art of Home Theater!

Display Tweaked to Perfection by Calibrator Extraordinaire Gregg Loewen!

#6 of 46 Nathan*W

Nathan*W

    Screenwriter

  • 1,069 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 09 2001

Posted April 28 2004 - 06:41 AM

Quote:
And yet another change is that the offensive “What Makes the Red Man Red” song is gone! Thank goodness for that!!!
I personally don't see why people find this song offensive. Neverland is literally the Darling children's imaginations brought to life, and a child who plays "Cops and robbers" or "cowboys and indians" is going to have a very stylised and/or simplistic view of a people who are characterized in the Darling children's playtime as "the bad guys". The fact that native americans were chosen to symbolically represent "the bad guys" in this situation is unfortunate, but from a contextual standpoint is not necessarily inappropriate or offensive.

I personally think it's one of the high points of Disney's rendition, especially when Peter, Wendy and Co. discover through the rescue of Tigerlily that the indians do not fit into the simplistic mold of "bad guy" as was initially thought.
 

#7 of 46 Chris_Morris

Chris_Morris

    Screenwriter

  • 1,887 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 04 2002

Posted April 28 2004 - 11:24 AM

Great review. I forgot this was coming out, and thanks to the review, I can't wait to see it.


Chris

#8 of 46 Ricardo C

Ricardo C

    Producer

  • 5,060 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 14 2002

Posted April 28 2004 - 11:41 AM

Great review for a great, underrated film Posted Image

But that cover... Posted Image Yet another film with a cool theatrical poster that gets a 5-minute Photoshop hack job slapped on the cover. Eep.


Edited because I'd originally typed "overrated" instead of "underrated" :b
Man, an hour wasted on this sig! Thanks, Toshiba! :P

#9 of 46 Nate Anderson

Nate Anderson

    Screenwriter

  • 1,153 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 18 2001

Posted April 28 2004 - 04:40 PM

As a Peter Pan fan, I really enjoyed this film and this take on the book is a definite improvement over the Disney film.

I will also mention that I, for one, enjoyed Hook as well. It may be that I grew up with the film, and am therefore biased.
My Extensive DVD collection.

Shameless Webpage Plug: My Movie Reviews.

#10 of 46 Shane_M

Shane_M

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 232 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2004

Posted April 28 2004 - 05:07 PM

I think I'm going to read the book, and perhaps pick this up on DVD. I still haven't seen it, but it did look promising.

Thanks for the great review.
Shane
EyeCraveDVD.com (Owner | Editor-In-Chief)
My Blog

#11 of 46 AaronMK

AaronMK

    Supporting Actor

  • 768 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 30 1999
  • Real Name:Aaron Karp
  • LocationOrlando, FL

Posted April 28 2004 - 08:31 PM

Didn't go to this in the theater becuase of less than stellar reviews, but it sounds like it is at least worth a rental.

Although... Universal's forced trailers on recent releases have made me put their releases on the bottom of my "to see" list. Do they, at the very least, allow you to skip them with a press of the menu button on this release?

Thanks for the info.

#12 of 46 Ron-P

Ron-P

    Producer

  • 6,283 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 25 2000
  • Real Name:Ron

Posted April 29 2004 - 03:03 AM

Didn't know this was being released already. A must blind buy. Thanks for the review Jason.
You have all the weapons you need...Now fight!


#13 of 46 ChrisBEA

ChrisBEA

    Screenwriter

  • 1,657 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 19 2003

Posted April 29 2004 - 03:22 AM

Saw this in the theater, and found it to be a wonderful family film. I was really surprised because I didn't care for the commercials for it.
I am still on the fence whether to buy it yet or not, will see what the release price is....

Thanks for the review!

#14 of 46 paul_v

paul_v

    Second Unit

  • 320 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 18 2000

Posted April 29 2004 - 09:53 PM

I thought this film was fantastic. Can't wait to pick it up and my kids are excited too =)
Paul V

#15 of 46 MatthewLouwrens

MatthewLouwrens

    Producer

  • 3,031 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 18 2003

Posted April 29 2004 - 11:01 PM

It is a brilliant film, quite incredible. The sad thing is that this film was really underpromoted. It deserved to do a lot better.

Looking forward to picking it up.
Films watched in 2005 / 2006 / 2007 / 2008 / 2009 / 2010 / 2011
AFI Top 100 lists: Movies, Thrills - Completed / Laughs - 23 to go
Passions - 39 to go / Heroes & Villains - 10 to go / Songs - 42 to go

#16 of 46 Jason Perez

Jason Perez

    Second Unit

  • 310 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 06 2003

Posted April 30 2004 - 02:09 AM

Hello to everyone!

Wow, lots of love from this film! I just watched it again last night - a screening for my three-year old, and she loved it!

Aaron MK, there are trailers before the feature menu even comes up, and they cannot be skipped. As with most Universal releases these days, you will have to fast forward through them. Annoying? Oh yeah! At least it only takes a second or two at FF x 64! Posted Image

Cheers!

Jason
Padawan Learner in the Mystical Art of Home Theater!

Display Tweaked to Perfection by Calibrator Extraordinaire Gregg Loewen!

#17 of 46 Ernest Rister

Ernest Rister

    Producer

  • 4,148 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2001

Posted April 30 2004 - 04:25 AM

"At the risk of sounding like a heretic, I will begin this review by telling you all that I despise the Walt Disney version of Peter Pan for its grating rendition of Wendy, the depiction of the Indians, and because of how ridiculous Captain Hook comes across to me as! Come to think of it, the animated Pan is a real ass in that film as well!"

I stopped reading right there.

#18 of 46 Brandon Conway

Brandon Conway

    Lead Actor

  • 7,064 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 30 2002
  • Real Name:Brandon Conway
  • LocationNorth Hollywood, CA

Posted April 30 2004 - 06:44 AM

Well, I thought this adaptation of Peter Pan was wonderful, and I'm looking forward to owning it - whenever I can dig up the money to do so.....

"And now the reprimand, from an American critic. He reproaches me for using film as a sacred & lasting medium, like a painting or a book. He does not believe that filmmaking is an inferior art, but he believes, and quite rightly, that a reel goes quickly, that the public are looking above all for relaxation, that film is fragile and that it is pretentious to express the power of one's soul by such ephemeral and delicate means, that Charlie Chaplin's or Buster Keaton's first films can only be seen on very rare and badly spoiled prints. I add that the cinema is making daily progress and that eventually films that we consider marvelous today will soon be forgotten because of new dimensions & colour. This is true. But for 4 weeks this film [The Blood of a Poet] has been shown to audiences that have been so attentive, so eager & so warm, that I wonder after all there is not an anonymous public who are looking for more than relaxation in the cinema." - Jean Cocteau, 1932


#19 of 46 Jon Robertson

Jon Robertson

    Screenwriter

  • 1,568 posts
  • Join Date: May 19 2001

Posted April 30 2004 - 06:44 AM

Quote:
I stopped reading right there.
Then you missed a pretty damn good review.

Count me in as another who loves this film.

#20 of 46 ThomasC

ThomasC

    Lead Actor

  • 6,526 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 15 2001

Posted April 30 2004 - 07:58 AM

Quote:
I stopped reading right there.
I hope that doesn't stop you from seeing the movie, if you haven't already. Even though I thought some of the magic was missing, it was still a pretty good movie.