Jump to content



Photo

Jack the Giant Killer 1962


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 of 18 Arnie G

Arnie G

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 662 posts
  • Join Date: May 29 2002

Posted April 18 2004 - 12:41 AM

I just saw Jack the Giant Killer (1962) at a local shop. I had never heard of this before. It looks like it has Harryhausen monsters in it. Is anyone familiar with this movie? Looks like it might be goodPosted Image It says it's technicolor.
I've got my own Toto

#2 of 18 John Sparks

John Sparks

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 785 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 12 2001
  • Real Name:John Sparks
  • LocationI.E., CA

Posted April 18 2004 - 02:03 AM

...I just saw Jack the Giant Killer (1962) at a local shop. I had never heard of this before. It looks like it has Harryhausen monsters in it. Is anyone familiar with this movie? Looks like it might be good It says it's technicolor...


The monsters on the front cover look cool but that's not what you get inside.

This was made 4 years after "The 7th Voyage of Sinbad." It used 3 of the same people, Kerwin Mathews, Torin Thatcher and the director Nathan Juran and some of the lousiest looking stop motion photography you have ever seen...even when Harryhausen had no money to work with(The Animal World" sequence) his animation is miles above what you see in this film.

It's "NON-ANAMORPHIC," which makes it a no sale to alot of people and the color and sound is okay but with alot of edge enchancement.

View this only out of curiosity and then ask yourself...why would anyone in their right mind waste the talents of the above people to make such a load of garbage?
...retired at last...and Ray Harryhausen at my side!!!

 

My equipment consists of:

Epson 9500 UB PJ; 110" JKP Affinity Screen; Panasonic BD30 Player; Toshiba HDA1 Player; Definitive Speakers(center, towers, rear); Onkyo 608 A/V Receiver; Nevo Q50 Remote; TWC HD Cable Box.


#3 of 18 GerardoHP

GerardoHP

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 696 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 10 2001
  • Real Name:Gerardo Paron
  • LocationLos Angeles, California

Posted April 18 2004 - 02:58 PM

This was one of my favorite movies when I was a little kid. Then I saw it again a few years and I was surprised at the low-budget sets and effects, especially the stop motion animation.

I heard once that there are two versions of this film, a non-musical one (the one that I saw back in the 60's) and a musicalized one that was done a few years later. I never saw this second version.
Gerardo

#4 of 18 Dick

Dick

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 3,722 posts
  • Join Date: May 22 1999
  • Real Name:Rick

Posted April 19 2004 - 12:19 AM

I saw the musical version - it played on cable back in '91 or '92. Astonishingly bad. Completely re-edited, with atrocious dubbing. Not a true musical at all, just a fantasy turned into what the Maltin guide calls an "Ersatz" musical.

The unedited original does look shaky these days, but I, too, grew up liking it a tremendous lot and the nostalgia allows me to forgive its myriad shortcomings. It is a blatant SINBAD rip-off, but it does have its own charm. I think the witches attack on the ship is quite effective, and the tentacled sea creature is animated more smoothly than the other creatures. But it has a really decent music score, some breathtaking color (when it isn't washed out during some of the matte shots), and I believe would still hold appeal for children, even those weaned on technologically superior movies. It's fun! There.

#5 of 18 John Sparks

John Sparks

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 785 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 12 2001
  • Real Name:John Sparks
  • LocationI.E., CA

Posted April 19 2004 - 02:24 AM

It's still a piece of ****! Posted Image
...retired at last...and Ray Harryhausen at my side!!!

 

My equipment consists of:

Epson 9500 UB PJ; 110" JKP Affinity Screen; Panasonic BD30 Player; Toshiba HDA1 Player; Definitive Speakers(center, towers, rear); Onkyo 608 A/V Receiver; Nevo Q50 Remote; TWC HD Cable Box.


#6 of 18 JasenP

JasenP

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 1,286 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 21 1999

Posted April 19 2004 - 03:45 AM

Err... thanks John.

John Sparks the be all, end all, penultimate film critic.

You know, Fred, if you keep your sense of humor like you do, you just might make it.

The Archive

#7 of 18 Jack Briggs

Jack Briggs

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 16,725 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 03 1999

Posted April 19 2004 - 03:56 AM

No thread-crashing, please. And I saw this movie when it first ran, back in 1962. Haven't seen it since. Talk about a trip down memory lane.

#8 of 18 RobertR

RobertR

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 9,318 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 19 1998

Posted April 19 2004 - 04:02 AM

Quote:
I saw this movie when it first ran, back in 1962.


I saw it when it first ran, too. I remember thinking how marvelous it was at the time, but this is one film that can't hold up to childhood memories. I saw it again on cable in the 80s, and was disappointed by the poor quality of the effects.

#9 of 18 Bob Furmanek

Bob Furmanek

    Advanced Member

  • 2,720 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 10 2001

Posted April 19 2004 - 04:54 AM

I had problems with the transfer. The color level is very low, and I had to boost it on the monitor. Also, they cropped it to 1.85, which is too tight and occasionally cuts off tops of heads, and the top of the castle in several matte shots.

Bob Furmanek

www.3dfilmarchive.com

 

As there has been some colorful debate about the meaning of "Director-approved" transfers and how it relates to how widespread 1.66 was in the UK, I will make the following point. The dominant aspect ratio at British Studios between 1955-1970 WAS 1.75. This is based on research going through trade listings of hundreds of British films, as well as studio archives and other primary sources. 1.85 was the second most listed aspect ratio, with 1.65/1.66 a distant third.

 

Tom Crossplot - July 2013


#10 of 18 Jack Briggs

Jack Briggs

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 16,725 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 03 1999

Posted April 19 2004 - 08:06 AM

Robert -- that'd probably be my impression today as well. Remember Reptilicus? As a kid, I was blown away by the movie. When I saw it on cable a few years ago, I couldn't believe how bad it is.

#11 of 18 BarryRR

BarryRR

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 37 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 25 2004

Posted April 19 2004 - 10:26 AM

I recall seeing the TV commercial for this movie in '62 and was terrified (I was six years old, mind you). I saw the "musicalized" edition on cable too and, well, having a high tolerance for weird stuff, I didn't find it so bad. Posted Image

#12 of 18 RobertR

RobertR

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 9,318 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 19 1998

Posted April 19 2004 - 10:49 AM

Quote:
Remember Reptilicus?

Sure do. The monster was this silly limp rubber thing, instead of the wonderful stop motion Harryhausen stuff. I remember how as kids we marveled at the famous skeleton scene in Jason, because we couldn't figure out how it was done. Posted Image

#13 of 18 John Sparks

John Sparks

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 785 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 12 2001
  • Real Name:John Sparks
  • LocationI.E., CA

Posted April 20 2004 - 01:00 AM

Wasn't the "Reptilicus" creature a marionette? They must have whisked away the guy from Mexico that did the puppet for the giant bird in "The Flying Claw." Posted Image
...retired at last...and Ray Harryhausen at my side!!!

 

My equipment consists of:

Epson 9500 UB PJ; 110" JKP Affinity Screen; Panasonic BD30 Player; Toshiba HDA1 Player; Definitive Speakers(center, towers, rear); Onkyo 608 A/V Receiver; Nevo Q50 Remote; TWC HD Cable Box.


#14 of 18 Jan Strnad

Jan Strnad

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 1,004 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 1999

Posted April 20 2004 - 09:11 AM

I loved Jack the Giant Killer when I was twelve. It was out of circulation for a long, long time due to legal problems, and when it finally resurfaced on cable I grabbed my brand new video tape recorder and dashed over to a friend's house (I didn't have cable TV myself) and sat myself down for a special treat.

It was like sitting in a pile of dog feces. Not only did it not live up to my childhood remembrance, but it was the hated, reviled, hideous, mangled, tormented, abominable "musical" version. I felt as if I'd been hit in the head with a two-by-four.

Now that the non-musical version has been made available, and my expectations lowered, I think it's a fun movie for kids.

Jan
Jan Strnad

aka J. Knight,
author of Risen and Boo.

#15 of 18 Mark Zimmer

Mark Zimmer

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 4,258 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted April 21 2004 - 08:05 AM

Hope that stop motion fans have picked up a copy of Ray Harryhausen's autobiography, An Animated Life. It's gorgeous and copiously illustrated (though it has crappy cheap binding Posted Image ) and a must for folks posting here. Amazon has it for a mere $35US.

#16 of 18 John Sparks

John Sparks

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 785 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 12 2001
  • Real Name:John Sparks
  • LocationI.E., CA

Posted April 21 2004 - 01:04 PM

I had mine signed personally by Mr. Harryhausen on April 17th. A great addition to anyones collection.Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image
...retired at last...and Ray Harryhausen at my side!!!

 

My equipment consists of:

Epson 9500 UB PJ; 110" JKP Affinity Screen; Panasonic BD30 Player; Toshiba HDA1 Player; Definitive Speakers(center, towers, rear); Onkyo 608 A/V Receiver; Nevo Q50 Remote; TWC HD Cable Box.


#17 of 18 ChuckSolo

ChuckSolo

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 1,160 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 26 2003

Posted April 22 2004 - 10:37 AM

I too saw this as a kid on a double bill with the "Magic Sword" I saw "Jack the Giant Killer" on cable last summer and man was I surprised to see that the great movie I remembered seeing as a kid was actually pretty lousy. I laughed through the whole thing. Definately NOT Harryhausen quality by any means!!

#18 of 18 IanD

IanD

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 64 posts
  • Join Date: May 17 2006

Posted December 12 2009 - 11:41 PM

Can anyone offer screencaps comparing the MGM DVD to the Goodtimes edition?

Failing that, is the Goodtimes a proper open matte edition?






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Forum Nav Content I Follow