-Not Logged In-

Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

Disney, Pixar to go separate ways

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
175 replies to this topic

#1 of 176 ONLINE   Malcolm R

Malcolm R

    Executive Producer

  • 12,300 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2002
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationVermont

Posted January 29 2004 - 09:12 AM

Pixar tired of talking...
The purpose of an education is to replace an empty mind with an open mind.

#2 of 176 OFFLINE   Robert Anthony

Robert Anthony


  • 3,218 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 31 2003

Posted January 29 2004 - 09:15 AM

NICE. Who gets distro now? THAT'S the fun question. Dreamworks is probably out. Fox has their own CGI studio, right? Who fits?

#3 of 176 OFFLINE   Frank Grimes

Frank Grimes

    Second Unit

  • 260 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 19 2002

Posted January 29 2004 - 09:19 AM

Great news! Walt would be so proud of the way the company is being run right now...
I flip you. I flip you for real.
My Big Top 20

#4 of 176 OFFLINE   ThomasC


    Lead Actor

  • 6,526 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 15 2001

Posted January 29 2004 - 09:22 AM

There's Paramount, University, Sony/Columbia, and Warner Brothers/New Line. There's MGM too, but they may be sold to Time Warner.

#5 of 176 OFFLINE   Peter Kline

Peter Kline


  • 2,409 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 09 1999

Posted January 29 2004 - 09:36 AM

I know there's a lot of Disney-bashing at HTF. The fact is, however, that no other studio has the clout that Disney has in the family film business. This is too bad it's not necessarily a good thing in the long run for Pixar. In fact, Pixar will lose all rights to the characters for the films Disney has distributed, which will include, I believe, the upcoming The Incredibles (2005). An interesting development will be what happens to Michael Eisner. And, the way that Hollywood works, don't believe that every other studio would be willing to give the company away for rights to Pixar product. It will be an interesting year. And, don't count Disney out just yet.

#6 of 176 OFFLINE   Sean Laughter

Sean Laughter


  • 1,385 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 1999

Posted January 29 2004 - 09:42 AM

I've heard this whole argument, and I'm not sure I'm buying it. Disney's "clout" certainly hasn't helped most of its non-Pixar productions do the same business as the Pixar films.

#7 of 176 OFFLINE   Morgan Jolley

Morgan Jolley

    Lead Actor

  • 8,375 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 16 2000

Posted January 29 2004 - 09:49 AM

If a film is good, the reviews will help it out enough, followed by word of mouth. Pixar is already well known enough, and they can advertise their films with "from the people who brought you Toy Story/Monsters Inc./Finding Nemo" even if they don't own the rights to those movies.

#8 of 176 OFFLINE   Robert Anthony

Robert Anthony


  • 3,218 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 31 2003

Posted January 29 2004 - 09:52 AM

I'm inclined to agree with Sean: I think the "Disney" clout is wholly Pixar's now. The torch has been passed ,for lack of a better, less grandiose and corny expression Posted Image

I'm not just talking quality of film--although that should be enough. But reputation and overall customer satisfaction. How much Disney success WITHOUT Pixar has there been? not much .Certainly a hell of a lot more flops. And bad blood. And blah, boring storytelling that's disillusioning a lot of moviegoers, parents AND children.

None of that happens with Pixar. They're 5 for 5, and people are coming to depend on Pixar the way people USED to depend on Disney.

I bet Warner's picks em up.

#9 of 176 OFFLINE   Sean Laughter

Sean Laughter


  • 1,385 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 1999

Posted January 29 2004 - 09:58 AM

*drools at thought of a Pixar remake/sequel to "The Iron Giant"*

#10 of 176 OFFLINE   Robert Anthony

Robert Anthony


  • 3,218 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 31 2003

Posted January 29 2004 - 10:01 AM

Yeah, I thought of that as I was writing it. I first thought of it because it just makes sense that Warners--which has always been seen as kind-of in competition with the Disney characters (Bugs vs Mickey, Daffy vs Donald, etc. etc.) would make a move to bolster their own Family section with Pixar.

But Brad Bird is in tight with Pixar...And Pixar's been talking about their own 2-d animation projects...

Warner's also has that huge media conglomerate thing going for em...Posted Image

#11 of 176 OFFLINE   Chris


    Lead Actor

  • 6,790 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 04 1997

Posted January 29 2004 - 10:16 AM

If this doesn't affirm damn near everything Roy Disney was saying about Eisner's ways to turn off important clients, I don't know what does. Expect Disney stock to plunge.
My Current DVD-Profiler

"I've been Ostrafied!" - Christopher, Sopranos 5/6/07

#12 of 176 OFFLINE   Andy_MT


    Second Unit

  • 486 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 23 2001

Posted January 29 2004 - 10:39 AM

here's the rest of the story from Wired ...


#13 of 176 OFFLINE   David Rogers

David Rogers

    Supporting Actor

  • 723 posts
  • Join Date: May 15 2000

Posted January 29 2004 - 11:11 AM

First, excellent! About friggin' time. Pixar deserves to see their names on their films, all the time. The Oscar noms list "Finding Nemo" as a Disney film for Christ's sake, which is a crime exceeded only by Eisner's shoddy treatment of his employees. Second, this move hurts Pixar exactly zero. Not even a bit. Perhaps a few Disney-thumpers out there in the Bible Belt have a Disney-only rule for their children's movies, but I doubt many if any. From the article:
I think that sums it up. Eisner signed Pixar to a shotgun deal, as in holding a shotgun to their heads. He not only got percentages of revenue, he also got all rights to the characters. Somehow I think Woody and Buzz, Mike and Sully, Flick and the Princess, and Nemo, Marlin and Dory ... will never be the same with Eisner's hacks writing for them. They certainly won't look the same. They're basically dead characters, truly existing only on the discs we own and in the hearts and minds of Pixar and movie lovers. Eisner is a hack. Were I a studio head, I'd move Heaven and Earth to keep Pixar signed. I'd have swallowed my pride and admitted the original deal was a bad deal they'd be crazy to even consider extending. I'd admit they deserve to control their own characters and films, and I'd beg to be allowed to distribute their films. Delightfully, Eisner is too friggin' stupid to realise any of this. Which means we finally get Pixar! (does the Snoopy dance)

Dave's World
-No matter where you go, there you are-

#14 of 176 ONLINE   Malcolm R

Malcolm R

    Executive Producer

  • 12,300 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2002
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationVermont

Posted January 29 2004 - 11:42 AM

I'd love to see them under the New Line/Warner banner. Given NL's consistently excellent "Platinum Series" DVD's, can you imagine the Special Editions we'd get of Pixar titles?

Where's the salivating smiley? Posted Image
The purpose of an education is to replace an empty mind with an open mind.

#15 of 176 OFFLINE   Jonathan Dagmar

Jonathan Dagmar

    Supporting Actor

  • 723 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 29 2002

Posted January 29 2004 - 12:10 PM

I don't care you picks up Pixar, makes no difference to me, though newline would be nice. I am just glad to see Disney getting a kick in the ass. That compnay is but a shadow of what it once was, and it needs a mjor shake up. I'm with Roy Disney on this one.

#16 of 176 OFFLINE   Adam Lenhardt

Adam Lenhardt

    Executive Producer

  • 15,884 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 16 2001
  • LocationAlbany, NY

Posted January 29 2004 - 12:24 PM

I'd prefer Warners or TCF. They're the studios that will have the greatest home presentation.

#17 of 176 OFFLINE   Eric Eash

Eric Eash

    Second Unit

  • 367 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 2003

Posted January 29 2004 - 12:46 PM

just look at toy story 2 compared to all the other disney sequels. if a toy story 3 came out with out pixar, i don't think tim allen and tom hanks would be coming back. it kinda upsets me that pixar can create all those wonderful characters and now have no rights to them. eric
"Everybody thinks they have a sense of humor, even if they don't." -favorite movie quote!

Can your sub hit 120db @ 10Hz?...Just wondering.
My DIY Sub for sale

#18 of 176 OFFLINE   John_Berger



  • 2,489 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 01 2001

Posted January 29 2004 - 01:01 PM

It's about time. Maybe now Pixar can retain the trademarks on their characters like Eric alluded to.

#19 of 176 OFFLINE   Ernest Rister

Ernest Rister


  • 4,148 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2001

Posted January 29 2004 - 01:14 PM

On March 3rd, Disney Stockholders will vote to approve the make-up of the current board of directors. Roy Disney has been sending e-mails to Disney stockholders asking them to vote "no" on Eisner and other Eisner cronies on the board. Now, Steve Jobs knows this, and Steve Jobs apparently has no love for Michael Eisner. Think of it this way - by severing ties with Disney now, it could help force the removal of Eisner from the Disney board of directors. If that were to happen, what is to stop Jobs and Roy and the new Disney CEO from striking a new agreement with Pixar after Eisner is fired? Some have said this is a negotiation tactic...it could be more than that. It could be a tactic to re-structure the management at Disney itself. Expect Roy Disney to start really pouring it on Michael Eisner now. Pixar just gave Roy Disney a huge weapon to use in his battle for Disney, and this should be extremely fun to watch. Give 'em hell, Roy.

#20 of 176 OFFLINE   Michael St. Clair

Michael St. Clair


  • 6,009 posts
  • Join Date: May 03 1999

Posted January 29 2004 - 01:18 PM

I am convinced that Disney will not rise out of this funk until they hit rock bottom.

This Pixar mismanagement is the next step.

I'll laugh my ass off if Brad Bird does a hand-drawn film for Pixar and it rejuvinates the theatrical art form that has largely been killed off by Disney's poor writing and micro-management.

I'm a big Disney fan, and at this point I'm rooting against them until they start representing the quality that they used to stand for.

I mean, think about it. They drop 2D feature films, claiming that ticket buyers only want 3D, and then they drop the studio that made every one of their successful 3D films, all in a one month period? Posted Image

Remember, Lucasfilm did the same thing to FOX. But FOX was smart enough to settle for a good distribution deal and give up trademark. Smart FOX. Dumb Disney.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users