Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

Enterprise moving to 9pm......


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 of 19 OFFLINE   todd s

todd s

    Lead Actor



  • 7,017 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 08 1999

Posted January 27 2004 - 07:24 AM

According to www.zap2it.com Enterprise will be moving to 9pm.

'Enterprise' Moves, 'Mullets' Back from Dead on UPN
(Tuesday, January 27 10:54 AM)


LOS ANGELES (Zap2it.com) - UPN has always said that "The Mullets" went on hiatus when it was yanked from the schedule in October, but most observers assumed the show was dead.
And we all know what happens when you assume: "The Mullets" comes back.

The business-in-front, party-in-back sitcom will return to the air on Wednesday, March 10. It will air at 8:30 p.m. ET, following the premiere of UPN's computer-animated series "Game Over" at 8. "Star Trek: Enterprise" is moving back an hour to 9 p.m.


"Enterprise's" move to 9 p.m. -- one of primetime's most competitive hours -- solves a minor dilemma for the network. UPN is currently airing repeats of "America's Next Top Model" in the timeslot, but the reality series will have ended its season by early March.
The schedule shuffle also appears to bury freshman sci-fi series "Jake 2.0" a little deeper. It was pulled for the "Top Model" repeats earlier this month, and production recently shut down.

Of course, "The Mullets" was in a similar situation last fall, and look what happened.

Bring back John Doe! Or at least resolve the cliff-hanger with a 2hr movie or as an extra on a dvd release.

#2 of 19 OFFLINE   Eric C D

Eric C D

    Second Unit



  • 285 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 14 2001

Posted January 27 2004 - 08:47 AM

Great... Posted Image

I watch either "West Wing" or "Angel" and tape the other. Then there's the O.C. which has been making a dent into those audiences.

Methinks this move will kill Enterprise.

#3 of 19 OFFLINE   Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul



  • 38,110 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted January 27 2004 - 08:53 AM

Or The Bachelorette! Posted Image
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#4 of 19 OFFLINE   Michael Reuben

Michael Reuben

    Studio Mogul



  • 21,769 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 12 1998

Posted January 27 2004 - 08:58 AM


Or give it a decent burial. Posted Image

M.
COMPLETE list of my disc reviews.       HTF Rules / 200920102011 Film Lists

#5 of 19 OFFLINE   Glenn Overholt

Glenn Overholt

    Producer



  • 4,207 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 24 1999

Posted January 27 2004 - 09:11 AM

You'd think that they'd know better. If you want to 'kill' Enterprise, just move it to Friday! Posted Image

Glenn

#6 of 19 OFFLINE   Nelson Au

Nelson Au

    Executive Producer



  • 11,721 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 1999

Posted January 27 2004 - 09:32 AM

This could be good news and it was something I was thinking UPN should do in light of Jake 2.0's cancellation. It's the traditional timeslot for past Trek shows. I don't know Angel so I have no idea if it will be able to compete. West Wing's audience and Trek's is likely not the same and while Smallville may or may not have hurt Trek, it won't hurt to get away from it as the audience is likely similar. I think that the two shows that will lead into Enterprise, Mullets and this other new show could be good for Enterprise as it looks like they are appealing to a younger audience. If the show can keep it's current viewers and attract newer ones from the lead in, and with the change in the shows quality (whether you believe it's better or not) may be enough to keep it going. I think it's improved and if Proving Ground is an indication and they've got as good as this coming, they might pull out of this spin.

#7 of 19 OFFLINE   Qui-Gon John

Qui-Gon John

    Producer



  • 3,527 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 02 2000

Posted January 27 2004 - 10:12 AM

I'm an Enterprise and Smallville person, so I welcome this move!

#8 of 19 OFFLINE   Jason Seaver

Jason Seaver

    Lead Actor



  • 9,306 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted January 27 2004 - 10:13 AM

How so? Voyager was there for a few seasons, after being on Monday at 8am when UPN launched. TNG and DS9, as syndicated shows, didn't have a national time-slot, though Saturday at 7pm seemed to be the most common for TNG (though I remember our local Fox station having it Tuesday at 8pm before Fox broadcast all week); DS9 was all over the map, from Sunday 8pm to Saturday at 10pm (WGME-Portland must have been the last station in the country to show it every week, and they pissed off fans of Walker, Texas Ranger). This is shuffling deck chairs, though - I suppose Angel is slighly weaker competition, but there 9pm Wednesday seems more crowded than 8pm. For me, this will basically mean I can tape That 70s Show while the Replay gets Smallville. If I were UPN, I might reverse Game Over and The Mullets, just because I don't see how the redneck show fits between the two nerd shows.
Jay's Movie Blog - A movie-viewing diary.
Transplanted Life: Sci-fi soap opera about a man placed in a new body, updated two or three times a week.
Trading Post Inn - Another gender-bending soap, with different collaborators writing different points of view.

"What? Since when was this an energy...

#9 of 19 OFFLINE   Tom Brennan

Tom Brennan

    Screenwriter



  • 1,070 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 01 2000

Posted January 27 2004 - 10:15 AM

I think this is a very smart move. I think Enterprise loses a lot of potential audience to Smallville and other shows in that slot. The show has really shown improvement this past year, and it deserves to be seen by a wider audience. If they were smart, they would cut together some promos highlighting many of the terrific episodes from this past season. Maybe that would hook some people who aren't normally Trek fans. Wasn't Quantum Leap's timeslot Wednesdays at 9 for a while?
 This Are Intentionally Left Blank

#10 of 19 OFFLINE   Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul



  • 38,110 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted January 27 2004 - 10:42 AM

Maybe UPN is following the Donald's lead (The Apprentice moving to Thursdays on NBC) and not wanting to face the American Idol Results show juggernaut on Wednesdays at 8:30 p.m. EST.
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#11 of 19 OFFLINE   Nelson Au

Nelson Au

    Executive Producer



  • 11,721 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 1999

Posted January 27 2004 - 11:02 AM

Update from Star Trek.com. Some speculate this is a temporary time change due to the specific dates. It could also mean that these are dates for first run episodes:


#12 of 19 OFFLINE   Will_B

Will_B

    Producer



  • 4,733 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2001

Posted January 27 2004 - 02:52 PM

Competing with Angel is not a great idea, but, the 9pm slot is thought of as the time for dramas, which Enterprise certainly is. I suspect this testing-of-the-9pm-waters will be beneficial for Enterprise's ratings, attracting a larger adult audience.
"Scientists are saying the future is going to be far more futuristic than they originally predicted." -Krysta Now

#13 of 19 OFFLINE   Jason Seaver

Jason Seaver

    Lead Actor



  • 9,306 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted January 27 2004 - 03:29 PM

Technically, I suppose, but I tend to think of it more as an "action hour" than a drama. It certainly seems pretty lightweight when you compare it to most in the "drama" category.
Jay's Movie Blog - A movie-viewing diary.
Transplanted Life: Sci-fi soap opera about a man placed in a new body, updated two or three times a week.
Trading Post Inn - Another gender-bending soap, with different collaborators writing different points of view.

"What? Since when was this an energy...

#14 of 19 OFFLINE   Mikel_Cooperman

Mikel_Cooperman

    Producer



  • 4,184 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 16 2001

Posted January 28 2004 - 04:38 AM

This move shows how much Paramount and UPN are in denial about this show. Instead of handing the show over to people that could make it bettter(I dont know, maybe its too late) they movie it to 9:00 where its already one of the most heavily saturated nights on TV with Angel and O.C and The West Wing. I really dont think it has to do with timeslot anymore I think fans would be watching if it were good and most have abandoned the franchise already. Too little, too late!

#15 of 19 OFFLINE   Brent Hutto

Brent Hutto

    Supporting Actor



  • 532 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 30 2001

Posted January 28 2004 - 06:02 AM

Let's say you're running a barely-viable "network" and have a severely limited amount of decent programming with which to populate your schedule. Let's say you have an expensive show that is probably a lost cause due to tanking in the ratings. Wouldn't it be a reasonable idea to use that show to fill a spot on the schedule where you're hopelessly outclassed no matter what you do? In theory, that may be a good way to allocate your resources (decent programming) if such a network and such a show were to exist...

#16 of 19 OFFLINE   Tom Brennan

Tom Brennan

    Screenwriter



  • 1,070 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 01 2000

Posted January 28 2004 - 07:51 AM

What do you guys think would be the best timeslot for "Enterprise" ? Mondays at 8? Tuesdays at 8? Another day?
 This Are Intentionally Left Blank

#17 of 19 OFFLINE   TheLongshot

TheLongshot

    Producer



  • 4,119 posts
  • Join Date: May 12 2000

Posted January 28 2004 - 02:17 PM

That's probably the point. It is probably to get more eyes on Mullets... Jason

#18 of 19 OFFLINE   Jason Seaver

Jason Seaver

    Lead Actor



  • 9,306 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted January 28 2004 - 03:38 PM

But, instead, could result in more eyes for "American Idol Results" and then "The OC".
Timeslot is sort of a false issue. When Enterprise runs doesn't matter, the hardcore Trek-fan audience the franchise has been reduced to will tune in any time. It needs to be good enough, or seen as cool enough, to attract a bigger audience to it. No matter what timeslot you've got, there's going to be decent competition; the mythical timeslot where there's no entrenched competition and lots of viewers doesn't exist in a six-network universe. That said, I'd try something really nutty and swap it with Smackdown!. The only other action hour on in that time period is Threat Matrix, and it puts the network's highest rated show (I think it does better than the WWE, if just barely) on the night when advertisers are trying to get at the most eyeballs. Then I'd stick an unscripted show after it, because there's no point in putting comedies against NBC or action/drama against CSI.
Jay's Movie Blog - A movie-viewing diary.
Transplanted Life: Sci-fi soap opera about a man placed in a new body, updated two or three times a week.
Trading Post Inn - Another gender-bending soap, with different collaborators writing different points of view.

"What? Since when was this an energy...

#19 of 19 OFFLINE   Mikel_Cooperman

Mikel_Cooperman

    Producer



  • 4,184 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 16 2001

Posted January 29 2004 - 11:41 AM

I agree. The timeslot stopped being an issue with this show after the first season. People sampled the show and saw that the quality was up to par with Voyager which is not a good thing. The Trek audience started abandoning the franchise from there and hasnt been able to bounce back from there. I think the damage has been done and a timeslot move wont help. So no, I don't think there would be a better timeslot. Trek has a horrible image now with this, Voyager and the last two movies.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users