-

Jump to content



Photo
DVD Reviews

HTF REVIEW: HALLOWEEN - 25th ANNIVERSARY



This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
62 replies to this topic

#61 of 63 OFFLINE   Mattias_ka

Mattias_ka

    Supporting Actor

  • 567 posts
  • Join Date: May 21 2001

Posted November 17 2003 - 11:19 AM

Simon_Lepine, I wonder what laserdisc player was used when taken those screenshot? and what capure card used?
Thanks in advance.

/Mattias

#62 of 63 OFFLINE   Simon_Lepine

Simon_Lepine

    Supporting Actor

  • 601 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 19 2003

Posted November 17 2003 - 01:35 PM

Mattias, I wish I could answer you, but I didn't take those screenshots.

You should ask the people at horrordvd.com .

#63 of 63 OFFLINE   jamieson mathia

jamieson mathia

    Auditioning

  • 1 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 09 2005

Posted September 10 2005 - 10:14 AM

WELL I OWN BOTH AND YOU PEOPLE MUST HAVE BAD TVS CAUSE THEY BOTH LOOK CLEAR AND COLORS ARE FINE TO ME.IN FACT I CAN HARDLY TELL ANY DIFFERENCE.YOU PEOPLE HAVE MADE THE COLOR THING WAY MORE THAN IT REALLY IS THERE BOTH FINE.AS FOR THESE PEOPLE WHO SAY IT HURTS THE ORIGINAL THERE PROBABLY THE SAME PEOPLE WHO WOULDNT WAX THERE CLASSIC CAR.BUT HERES MY VIEW OF BOTH
PICTURE QUALITY- BOTH ARE GREAT
SOUND-BOTH ARE GREAT
DVD COVER ART-99 VERSION WINS HERE
PICTURE N STILL GALLERY-99 BETTER
EXTRAS-03 IS BETTER BUT 99 HAS THE TV FOOTAGE WHICH IS AWESOME.I SEEN A GUY MENTION ABOUT IT SLOWS THE PACE AND CARPENTER DIDNT LIKE IT BUT THATS LIKE SAYING YOU WOULD LIKE THE MOVIE BETTER IF IT WAS 12 MINUTES LESS JUST PLAIN DUMB.SOME PEOPLE JUST TRY TO ACT OLD ABOUT THE NEW STUFF JUST TO BE COOL SO THEY THINKPosted Image