What's new

STAR TREK: ENTERPRISE 9/24/'03: "Extinction" (1 Viewer)

Rex Bachmann

Screenwriter
Joined
Nov 10, 2001
Messages
1,972
Real Name
Rex Bachmann
episode title: "Extinction"
episode: #55
original airdate: September 24, 2003
writer: Andre Bormanis
director: LeVar Burton
synopsis: "On a mission to investigate an abandoned Xindi vessel on a jungle planet, Archer, Reed and Hoshi succumb to a virus that mutates them into a primal life form."


After a week with a better than okay episode, it looks like back to the rehash grind.
 

Craig S

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2000
Messages
5,884
Location
League City, Texas
Real Name
Craig Seanor
Man, this sounds like that 2nd season episode of Voyager ("Threshold") where Janeway & Paris mutate into giant salamanders. That was arguably the show's nadir (and with Voyager that's saying something).

Not too promising (at least this one doesn't have Braga as the writer).
 

Rollie

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
May 30, 2000
Messages
215
Man, this sounds like that 2nd season episode of Voyager ("Threshold") where Janeway & Paris mutate into giant salamanders. That was arguably the show's nadir (and with Voyager that's saying something).
That description reminded me of the TNG episode where the crew de-evolved. Ah, I love Star Trek.

P.S. In Threshold, didn't Janeway have Paris's child?
 

Craig S

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2000
Messages
5,884
Location
League City, Texas
Real Name
Craig Seanor
According to the episode guide on startrek.com (had to go out there to get the title), they had TWO little salamander pups. And they just abandoned them there on the planet!!

Where's Starfleet CPS when you need them??

;)
 

Nelson Au

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 16, 1999
Messages
19,129
Actually, the synopsis of this episode reads more like an episode of Space: 1999 called, The Full Circle. It was a pretty good one, where they land on a planet, enter a fog and de-evolve into cavemen, or Man of the past.

As usual, the way they edit and spin these previews, it never quite shows the real meat of the story. We'll see. I thought Anomoly was better then the preview's spin of the show.

Nelson
 

Dan Paolozza

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Oct 4, 2000
Messages
149

This reminds me of that episode from Voyager as well - which was probably the episode that sent me packing. I can only have a fools hope that the non-B&B writing credit will take this story and make it a good one.

What I find astounding (should I, at this point?) is that the plot synopsis sounds almost identical to that Voyager episode. I don't know...I give up...I'll just cross my fingers and call it a day.
 

TheLongshot

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 12, 2000
Messages
4,118
Real Name
Jason
Didn't the preview for this episode have them meeting someone else from a ship called "Enterprise"? I see nothing in the episode description about that...

Jason
 

Scott Kimball

Screenwriter
Joined
May 8, 2000
Messages
1,500
the synopsis of this episode reads more like an episode of Space: 1999 called, The Full Circle
I, too, was immediately reminded of this.

Right after that, I was reminded of the TNG episode. Then the Voyager episode. Then that Stargate:SG1 episode with a similar theme, when Jack and others de-evolve... Then the... ahhh, nevermind.

Sheesh.

-Scott
 

PhilipG

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2000
Messages
2,002
Real Name
PhilipG
Not a very good episode. But still light years ahead of that awful Voyager ep...

Bakula trying to improve his acting range to two characters was quite amusing.

Unfortunately, Enterprise is still plagued with "every character is interchangeable" syndrome. So the marines were nowhere to be found. Trip leads the rescue team. Everyone else just reads the lines depending on where they happen to be at the time.

Why couldn't they beam T'Pol directly to medlab isolation? Why didn't the aliens respond to their comrades being shot on the planet? Why did they allow the Enterprise shuttle to dock, or not make any sort of a fuss? Why did Trip order the Enterprise to go to warp (the Enterprise was never in danger if it stayed in orbit)?

Oh, and Vulcan Barbie's nice white costume stays remarkably clean all the way through.

edit: removed spoiler tags
 

Jack Briggs

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 3, 1999
Messages
16,805
Not only that, but a complete flip-flop. The reason for leaving the "Star Trek" out of the series title was itself a ratings-boosting ploy. And the reason for it was that the Paramount wags were worried about Star Trek overload.
 

Will_B

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2001
Messages
4,730
This episode also reminded me of the "Beer Bad" episode of Buffy.

But despite being weighed down by the done-it-a-million-times-already concept, they did add what I felt was a poignant moment with the loss of the city.


And indeed, the special effects in that scene, although the computer generated imagery did not look real, it DID give me a thrill to how science fiction imagery used to inspire me as a child. So I guess I am saying this was a bad episode with some nice moments that reminded me of how even cheesy science fiction could be inspiring when I was younger.

I'll give is a "C" and assume it was a low point.
 

Dave Scarpa

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 8, 1999
Messages
5,765
Real Name
David Scarpa
Actually it was better than I expected, the high point for me, the music, which I thought was some of the best of the series
 

Rex Bachmann

Screenwriter
Joined
Nov 10, 2001
Messages
1,972
Real Name
Rex Bachmann
This is what I find so sad about Enterprise: Nobody seems to be at home among the producers of this series.

Even with their long-term science advisor writing the scripts, they still don't seem to pay attention to certain, crucial details of their own stories. To wit:

A "mutagenic virus" that assimilates the DNA of members of other (sentient) intelligent species to that of its creators, a now long dead race (the Lokeq (sp.?)), which had lost the natural ability to reproduce.

This recalls the infectious spore (or whatever it was) that rewrote human DNA, including Geordi LaForge's, in the creepy and wonderful TNG episode "Identity Crisis". That, however was supposed to be a natural process, rather than an artificial one.

(1) "The facts, man. Just the facts."
:

The problem I have is that the viral infection has transformed the crew members' minds as well as their bodies, no? I can buy the virus's genetically altering their brains to "crave" coming to stay in the Lokeq's home territory, but I don't buy at all their magically having an alien language as result of the infection, simply because language is learned, not inherited.

(2) Ignoring the implications of the premise?:

I find the savage characterizations of the transformed crew members totally at odds with the "civilized" and technically advanced civilization that created the transforming agent. Did I miss an explanation for this discrepancy?

Why does a virus created by an advanced civilization to transform others into members of that civilization turn them instead into raging savages?

Or, is this supposed to be some temporary side-effect? (I didn't hear Phlox say so.)
Or, since, once the UT gets working, suddenly the behavior becomes more "civilized" and sympathetic, is the story saying, as it seems to, that strange people are only savages if they don't speak your language?

(3) "Medical protocols, anyone?":

I find it awfully careless of Phlox to let the treated crew out among the noninfected until he's damned sure that the virus is both over in them and can no longer be transmitted to others. This whole quarantine is treated far too lightly, in my opinion. (I should think it would last several weeks, rather than days, to be absolutely sure. Would they really risk infecting "tens of millions" of their fellow Earthers, or members of other species, for that matter, as the opposing race claims to have experienced?) That robs the episode of the heft and gravity it ought to have.

(4) False ethical stance of the week: Archer refusing to destroy the last bit of the viral agent so that the civilization/genome of the Lokeq may not die out forever. What, pray tell, would be the practical use of this agent in future, especially since it involves the unwilling genetic assimilation of other species/races? How "ethical" would that be? Sort of makes one side with the (unnamed?) opposing alien group, doesn't it? It also throws the dead civilization in a not very favorable light.


(5) Story glitch:

By the way, isn't it still Ensign Mayweather? I know they want to give the actor something to do, but why is an ensign left in charge of the bridge, especially during a time of eminent hostility?

Do the producers ever really think about what they put on screen week after week?

Frustrating.
 

Al Shing

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Messages
108
Actually, the synopsis of this episode reads more like an episode of Space: 1999 called, The Full Circle. It was a pretty good one, where they land on a planet, enter a fog and de-evolve into cavemen, or Man of the past.
There was a Doctor Who episode with that title, and also with a circular evolution plot. That episode was the first one in the E-Space arc, when they were trapped in a smaller version of space that was difficult to get out of, kind of like the Expanse.
 

PhilipG

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2000
Messages
2,002
Real Name
PhilipG
or it could be the solution to the Xindi problem when the time comes
That's exactly what I was thinking. If this had been an episode of Farscape, you can be sure they'd have said, "Okay, now we have a weapon." Bang goes any future problem with the Klingons. ;)
 

Nelson Au

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 16, 1999
Messages
19,129
I may be reaching out there, but if you ask me, the way the episode ended, you could say it had a minor resemblance to The Inner Light, where Archer and crew relive the lives of a past civilization.

Overall, good pacing,music, nice depiction of the past city on the planet and engaging. But not a stand out. I also thought that Archer was going to use the viral agent as a weapon too. A slight diversion from the main mission of finding the Xindi.

And as usual, the previews definitely spin this show in a way that is different then the actual aired plot. It was not a copy of the Voyager episode as I recall it.

Big change, the folks at UPN did have the producers make the change official on the opening titles and now call it "Star Trek Enterprise", a change from Berman and Braga's original premise that it is not going to be called Star Trek because it really isn't "Trek", yet. No Federation and Starfleet as we know it.

Rex, regarding the ethical stance of saving the viral agent and the alien's original intent for it. The idea of it being moral is a human standard you're placing on it. Yes for us, it's rather a bad thing, but they were trying to save their race, so they were doing what they had to do, their morals. My interpretation.
 

Mike Breeden

Agent
Joined
Nov 28, 2000
Messages
39
Quote: PhilipG

"Oh, and Vulcan Barbie's nice white costume stays remarkably clean all the way through."

She must have been wearing the new Docker Stain defender catsuit.
:D
 

Will_B

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2001
Messages
4,730
Rex, all those complaints are just technical nit picks. You already guessed explanations for some of it (the way they creatures acted primitive when they were new, and then become progressively more cultured). And throwaway lines of dialogue explained some of the rest - the alien captain explaining that besides changing their bodies the virus also created some memory engrams to cause them to seek out the city, etc.

If your own imagination can cover those points, there's no need for the show to do it for you, as long as answers are within easy reach.

But my other reason for not wanting a show to limit itself to early 21st century science is that anything today's "science advisors" provide will probably be wrong in a hundred years time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,034
Messages
5,129,217
Members
144,286
Latest member
acinstallation172
Recent bookmarks
0
Top