Adam_Reiter
Second Unit
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2001
- Messages
- 461
Let’s see what I remembered: uhh… something…something...policeman. Something...something.. terrorists. Then there was something…something….dead dogs hanging from lamp posts with dynamite stuck in their necks. Then...something...something...“Viva Presedente Ezequiel!” (usually followed by a bombing) I then ...Obviously Adam, you missed the point. So as "Simon Says", maybe you should have simply reviewed the technical elements of the DVD.
His comments about Malkovich's annoying vocal tick meaning he couldn't listen to the whole commentary compound a poor review from somebody who shouldn't be reviewing this type of film.How does his comments on the commentary disqualify him as a reviewer for "this type of film"? And what "type of film" is this, pray tell? And what "type of film" should Mr. Reiter be reviewing, in your (apparently) unquestionable judgement?
Do you feel as though Mr. Reiter didn't put enough effort into the film and thus you don't feel a negative review is warranted? Would you be comfortable with any negative review of this film?
Obviously Adam, you missed the point. So as "Simon Says", maybe you should have simply reviewed the technical elements of the DVD.Actually Juan, I did do that. See sections "Picture", and "Sound", and "Extras".
Would you be comfortable with any negative review of this film?I don't see why not as I haven't seen the film, I read the review to find out more about it, as I have read many well-written and insightful reviews here. In this case I don't think the reviewer was comfortable with the style of film and the review is tainted by his discomfort.