Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

DVD Reviews

HTF REVIEW: Willard (2003)

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
16 replies to this topic

#1 of 17 OFFLINE   Michael Elliott

Michael Elliott

    Lead Actor

  • 7,155 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 11 2003
  • Real Name:Michael Elliott
  • LocationKY

Posted September 17 2003 - 08:28 AM

Posted Image

Willard (2003)

Studio: New Line
Year: 2003
Rated: PG-13
Film Length: 100 minutes
Aspect Ratio: Anamorphic Widescreen (2.35:1)
Audio: DD EX 5.1 Surround, DD Stereo Surround
Subtitles: English, Spanish

The past couple of decades remakes have taken over the horror genre but for some odd reason it was always the classics being remade. Some like John Carpenter’s The Thing and the 1990 version of Night of the Living Dead worked while others such as House on Haunted Hill fell on its face and was more of an insult to the original than anything else. I never really understood the point of remaking great films and I always asked myself why the studios didn’t try to take bad movies and make them good. With 2003’s Willard that happened to come true. The original 1971 version with Ernest Borgnine has a small cult following but in my opinion its one of the worst horror films of the decade.

If you’ve seen the first film then you pretty much know the story for this remake. Willard (Crispin Glover) is a lonely man who lives in a huge house with his dying and over controlling mother. Willard has a job but is constantly picked on by his boss (R. Lee Ermey) who he has known since childhood. Willard’s father was a business partner but after his death his current boss has seen him as nothing more than dirt to walk on. Willard’s co-workers see him as an outcast and that’s why he has no friends.

Back at his house his mother begins to complain that there are rats in the basement. Willard buys all the supplies to kill them and eventually catches one only to let it from because he doesn’t have the strength to kill it. He eventually gives this rat a name and starts hanging out in the basement with it. Soon other rats are showing up and Willard feeds them all and soon he considers them his only friend. There’s one rat however who doesn’t do everything Willard says and his name is Ben. Ben is an overly large rat who seems to have control over the others and soon Willard puts them to the test. After losing his job and the threat of losing his house, Willard sets his friends out to destroy all those people who tormented him throughout his life.

This version of Willard is certainly a lot better than the original but sadly this one here still isn’t a good movie. This one here is more stylish, better directed, better acted and features more rats but the problem is that his a horror film. It’s a horror film that doesn’t contain any scares and I’m really not sure if the director tried to make any. There’s a scene at the beginning where a fuse blows and this here is pretty much the only time the director tries to get a jump from the viewer. The rest of the time he tries to use the rats as fear but this doesn’t work because of Willard.

Willard treats the rats as if they were a dog or cat so there’s no point in the viewer being scared by them or being put off by them. The scenes with Willard and his rats is more cute than scary so when the rats go on the attack there’s really nothing for us to fear because we know they are protecting their friend. Another problem are the rats. Some of the rats are real and other’s are CGI effects yet it’s pretty amazing what they are able to do. The scenes with the real rats are do so well that you’ll be asking yourself how they were able to do the scene and that’s not something you want to be asking yourself while trying to be scared.

The best thing about Willard is the amazing performance by Glover who has become a cult hero among horror fans the past decade. His sunken eyes and weak body structure make us understand his character from the first time we see him. His shyness and stutter makes us understand why he has no friends and it makes us care for him. Glover does a brilliant job at showing Willard as a lonely and tormented soul and his fall into madness is very well done. R. Lee Ermey also does a nice job as the evil boss.

The fine performances aside there’s really no reason to watch this film. I can’t imagine any horror fan being entertained by this thing and I seriously doubt the non-horror fans would be interested in this revenge tale. With this second failed attempt at making this film I guess it’s time they give up and move to something else. Perhaps a boy and his ants that goes on a rampage. Or perhaps a boy and his pet turtles. Anything but these rats, which just aren’t scary in the least bit.

VIDEO---The movie is shown widescreen (2.35:1) and is enhanced for 16x9 TVs. New Line has delivered another wonderful performance making this another reference disc. The picture quality is perfect every step of the way with very detailed and strong colors that leap off the screen. There’s a wonderful moment in the film where Willard is walking to his boss’s house and the streets are full of various colors, which really shines here. The darker scenes feature wonderfully dark blacks without any speckles or other problems. The color tone throughout looks very natural.

AUDIO---We get Dolby Digital EX 5.1 Surround and a Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo Surround tracks. The 5.1 track is wonderfully well done, although it isn’t reference quality. The dialogue is very strong and clear without any problems. The music score sounds wonderfully and well detailed coming from the speakers but the real joy are all the sound effects used in the Surround’s. There’s a scene early in the film where a fuse blows and the effects here really stick out as something neat. The various rat noises are also very well done and sounds great.

EXTRAS---For starters we get a theatrical trailer and three television spots. Up next is an audio commentary with director Glen Morgan, producer James Wong and actors Glover and Ermey. The commentary track is pretty interesting when they are talking about the various CGI effects and how they got the rats to do what they wanted. There also too many boring moments however, which makes the track tough to listen to. Glover talks a lot about his character and various scenes that didn’t make the movie. There’s also talk about how this was supposed to be somewhat of a sequel to the original film. Up next is a featurette called Rat People: Friend or Foes, which runs around 18 minutes. This here talks about rats and their place in society. Unless you’re a rat lover I doubt you’ll get too much from this. Up next is a full length documentary called The Year of the Rat, which runs 78 minutes and is quite entertaining. A film student decided to make a documentary on the making of Willard so we get to see a lot of behind the scenes stuff from pre-production all the way up to the theatrical release. The DVD also contains Crispin Hellion Glover’s music video for “Ben”, which also has an optional commentary. Finally we get twelve alternate and deleted scenes, which is pretty interesting. Included are two alternate endings, which in my opinion are better than what’s featured in the film. DVD-Rom features include a script to screen screenplay, a rat gallery and a trivia game.

OVERALL---I’m not a fan of the original film and I’m not a fan of this one either. Why they wanted to remake Willard is beyond me but at least it does improve over the original. New Line has delivered another brilliant DVD with a flawless transfer and a very nice sound mix especially during all the rat attacks. The extras are certainly the highlight of this disc with the documentary being the key point. Fans will certainly want to check out the alternate endings as well.

Release Date:October 7, 2003

#2 of 17 OFFLINE   ChuckSolo



  • 1,160 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 26 2003

Posted September 17 2003 - 08:40 AM

Thanks for the great review although I don't agree with all of it. I saw the remake of "Willard" when 9it debuted in theaters at the beginning of the summer and found the remake better than the original for one reason......Crispin Glover. I don't think this movie was meant to horrify as much as shock and disgust. Excellent review though.

#3 of 17 OFFLINE   Eric Emma

Eric Emma

    Supporting Actor

  • 508 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 18 2003

Posted September 17 2003 - 08:47 AM

I loved this movie so I will definately pick it upPosted Image Nice review, glad the video/audio good and some decent extras

#4 of 17 OFFLINE   Dean Kousoulas

Dean Kousoulas

    Second Unit

  • 332 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 15 2002

Posted September 17 2003 - 10:24 AM

Can't wait for this release. Major props to New Line for giving this overlooked film a Platinum Series release.

"Earnest Hemingway once wrote 'The world is a fine place, and worth fighting for.' I agree with the 2nd part." - Morgan Freeman, Se7en

My DVD Collection

#5 of 17 OFFLINE   Travis_W


    Supporting Actor

  • 531 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 08 2000

Posted September 17 2003 - 12:18 PM

I saw this in the brief week it played at my cinema (the second and contractually third week became 9:30 only shows) and found it excellent. I've never seen the original and went in there knowing little to nothing. Definitely picking this up on the 7th along with Lion King...talk about a wierd combination Posted Image.
I am Jack's empty signature bar.

#6 of 17 OFFLINE   Michael Elliott

Michael Elliott

    Lead Actor

  • 7,155 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 11 2003
  • Real Name:Michael Elliott
  • LocationKY

Posted September 17 2003 - 02:28 PM

I'm rather shocked Paramount isn't taking the chance to release the original along with this remake. However, I actually prefer FOOD OF THE GODS over the WILLARD films. The original's sequel, BEN is actually better as well.

#7 of 17 OFFLINE   RyanChristoffel



  • 26 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 21 2002

Posted September 17 2003 - 02:32 PM

The movie intruiged me when I saw the trailer but I wasn't able to catch the movie in theaters. It sounds like something I'd really like but with your negative comments about it I'm not sure what I'll do.

#8 of 17 OFFLINE   Adam_Reiter


    Second Unit

  • 462 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 07 2001

Posted September 17 2003 - 05:58 PM

Thanx for the good review, Mike. This looked pretty interesting to me when I saw the previews. Based on your review, I think I will give it a rent first. Looks as though its probably something I wont want to buy.

PS. I wonder why our colors changed to purple. I preferred the blue much more. hmmm.

#9 of 17 OFFLINE   Michael Elliott

Michael Elliott

    Lead Actor

  • 7,155 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 11 2003
  • Real Name:Michael Elliott
  • LocationKY

Posted September 17 2003 - 07:31 PM

Thanks for the feedback guys. Posted Image

Adam, I just noticed the change in the colors so I'm not sure when it was done.

#10 of 17 OFFLINE   Shawn_Sek


    Stunt Coordinator

  • 118 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 02 2003

Posted September 17 2003 - 08:40 PM

i havent seen the film yet (though it will probably show at the $1 theater here before the video is released), but the technical aspects of the DVD definitely have me interested in picking up this DVD as a blind buy regardless. the quality sounds real nice and im a huge Crispin fan, so the commentary and his music video help make it worthwhile. thanks for the review, good work.
Biggest Bullshit Credit in American Film History? "Written & Directed By Quentin Tarantino"...how about COMPILED by?

#11 of 17 OFFLINE   JohnRice


    Lead Actor

  • 8,577 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 20 2000
  • Real Name:John

Posted September 18 2003 - 07:08 PM

I'll have to rent this just for the camp factor and Glover.

And that review was....well.....unusual.

The Hybrid System

The Music Part: Emotiva XSP-1, Thiel CS 3.6, Emotiva XPA-2, Marantz SA8004, Emotiva ERC-3, SVS PB-12 Plus 2

The Surround Part: Sherbourn PT-7030, Thiel SCS3, Emotiva XPA-5, Polk & Emotiva Surrounds.

#12 of 17 OFFLINE   Jeff_HR



  • 3,596 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 15 2001

Posted September 19 2003 - 02:57 AM

The original 1971 version with Ernest Borgnine has a small cult following but in my opinion its one of the worst horror films of the decade
I beg to differ. I find the original to be quaint & rather entertaining. I guess you can't account for taste. IMHO the original 1971 version is certainly not one of the worst horror films of the decade.
Cogito, Ergo Sum
My DVD Library / The BLOOD is the Life!
Pioneer Elite PRO PDP-111FD - 2/28/2009

#13 of 17 ONLINE   Randy Korstick

Randy Korstick


  • 2,478 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2000

Posted September 19 2003 - 05:11 AM

I agree Jeff. I always felt the original was creepy with a great performance by Davison. It did well at the box office too. Certainly more than a "small cult following" it was enough for a sequal "Ben" which was much more of a by the numbers horror film and nowhere near as good. The original has decent reviews in most film guides too. I have never seen it referred to as one of the worst of the decade. I could name at least 20 horror films from that decade that are much worse.
...When you eliminate the impossible whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth

Top 20 Films

#14 of 17 OFFLINE   TonyD


    Executive Producer

  • 16,240 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 01 1999
  • Real Name:Tony D.
  • LocationDisney World and Universal Florida

Posted October 06 2003 - 12:43 PM

I always asked myself why the studios didn’t try to take bad movies and make them good. With 2003’s Willard that happened to come true.
michael that sounds like you thought this was a good movie.

anyway i thought it was good.
the ben rat was especially creepy, with that stare.

#15 of 17 OFFLINE   Yumbo



  • 2,243 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 13 1999

Posted October 08 2003 - 06:59 AM

you'll have to watch this in the dark for such scenes.

creepy; isn't Laura (Elena) Herring just about in every movie coming out these days?

sound is decent.

the BEN song was a nice touch!

#16 of 17 OFFLINE   Everett Stallings

Everett Stallings

    Second Unit

  • 393 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 24 1998
  • Real Name:Everett
  • LocationWilmington,De

Posted October 28 2003 - 10:43 AM

I worked at a 1000 seat downtown Baltimore theatre where the original played to sell out crowds that screamed and jumped out of their seats!
Former projectionist @ all downtown theatres in Balto. City.Which are all closed. frown.gif

#17 of 17 OFFLINE   EricSchulz



  • 4,501 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 2004

Posted March 08 2004 - 04:48 AM

I had heard some mostly favorable reviews of this when it was in theaters, so I rented it...I was pretty disappointed. I wish it had been done as a lower budget film, so the director could have gone for the gore factor a bit more. Extremely weak in the "chills" department. Nice special effects though. A little too campy for me...a more straight forward horror film treatment is what this needed. Seemed too much like an extended episode of "Tales From The Crypt".