Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo

Any petitions to stop edge enhancement ???


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10 replies to this topic

#1 of 11 Andy_MT

Andy_MT

    Second Unit

  • 486 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 23 2001

Posted August 17 2001 - 10:06 AM

i've just been reading the WidescreenReview.com review of Forrest Gump. Once again, it looks as if excessive edge enhancement has been enforced by those chimps at paramount (not that paramount is the only studio that partakes in this madness).

is it just me or are the majority of video transfers on recently released DVDs deteriating in quality? i remember a time (not that long ago) when most transfers had smooth, film-ish like qualities. but titles like family man, cast away, forrest gump and countless others are looking more like transfers done back in the days in 97 (ringing and hard-edged appearance from EE), although obviously with better compression

why are the studios doing this? i would have predicted that by now, we should've all been enjoying flawness or at least near perfect video representations of these films. but it's going the other way.

i wonder if this has anything to do with J6P. you know, they want a sharper picture cause of their crappy set that they shelled out all of $50 for.

just out of curiosity, anyone out there who is actually for EE ? (granted, you sometimes get a nicer, sharper looking image on smaller sets, but what a price to pay)

so, any petitions out there to stop this insanity ?

thanks



#2 of 11 Jon Robertson

Jon Robertson

    Screenwriter

  • 1,568 posts
  • Join Date: May 19 2001

Posted August 17 2001 - 10:22 AM

It seems to me that doing countless online petitions means nothing to the companies.

However, if you got even 1,000 people to do write Paramount a letter (or whichever company), as opposed to 10,000 to sign an online petition, THEN they might start listening.

There's even a petition up now for George Lucas to change the name of Episode II! It's petition madness!

#3 of 11 Antonio_M

Antonio_M

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 135 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 07 2001

Posted August 17 2001 - 10:26 AM

This petition thing is getting out of hand.

#4 of 11 Jeff Ulmer

Jeff Ulmer

    Producer

  • 5,593 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 23 1998

Posted August 17 2001 - 10:29 AM

I say we start a petition to stop the petitions! Posted Image

Edge Enhancement has to go. Period.

------------------
Zardoz Online | Burt Lancaster is The Swimmer | dOc



#5 of 11 Justin Lane

Justin Lane

    Screenwriter

  • 2,149 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 18 2000

Posted August 17 2001 - 10:39 AM

Chill with these petition ideas already. Overusing them for trivial issues makes the important petitions appear less important.

J


#6 of 11 LarryDavenport

LarryDavenport

    Screenwriter

  • 2,980 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 1999

Posted August 17 2001 - 10:48 AM

Petitions generally don't work. Neither do emails. If you want your complaint to be taken seriously, write a letter and invest in a 34 cent stamp.

------------------
These chicks know how to party! - MoJo JoJo



#7 of 11 Andy_MT

Andy_MT

    Second Unit

  • 486 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 23 2001

Posted August 17 2001 - 01:34 PM

you could be onto something. i think you can have too many petitions.

however, edge enhancement ISN'T trivial. too many transfers are ruined by this. i still can't believe studios do this to their films, especially knowing the kind of quality DVD is capable of.

i'm personally not convinced the studios could give a **** what we think or feel, regardless of what method we use, petition, letter or otherwise. they just sniff out the $$$.

tsk!, their most loyal customers and this is how we're treated.




#8 of 11 Dome Vongvises

Dome Vongvises

    Lead Actor

  • 8,174 posts
  • Join Date: May 13 2001

Posted August 17 2001 - 06:01 PM

This will be an even bigger fight than stopping companies from releasing non-OAR movies. You have to convince people that EE is a nuisance. I lack the high-end setups most people on this forum have, so I don't notice ANY EE unless I'm actually looking for it. I'm the closest thing to J6P on here, and I'm not completely sold on EE at all. Try convincing J6P that EE really exists, and you've got a big battle ahead.

------------------
"I don't know, Marge. Trying is the first step towards failure." - Homer J. Simpson



#9 of 11 Michael Reuben

Michael Reuben

    Studio Mogul

  • 21,769 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 12 1998

Posted August 17 2001 - 06:13 PM

Quote:
i've just been reading the WidescreenReview.com review of Forrest Gump.
Sorry, but I'll wait for the disc to arrive before I get excited. Widescreen Review isn't the last word on a disc's quality; their judgment on image is as subjective as any reviewer's.

Andy, you and I must have different standards (or different equipment -- probably both). I've seen Family Man and Cast Away, and I didn't notice any obvious edge enhancement on either title.

M.
COMPLETE list of my disc reviews.       HTF Rules / 200920102011 Film Lists

#10 of 11 Antonio_M

Antonio_M

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 135 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 07 2001

Posted August 17 2001 - 06:38 PM

Quote:
Try convincing J6P that EE really exists, and you've got a big battle ahead.

How true. Posted Image


#11 of 11 Philip Hamm

Philip Hamm

    Lead Actor

  • 6,885 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 23 1999

Posted August 20 2001 - 02:14 AM

I think that most of the "edge enhancement" that people think they're seeing is really MPEG artifacts. MPEG video tends to create artifacts at edges that look like "edge enhancement".

------------------
Philip Hamm

AIM: PhilBiker
Philip Hamm
Moderator Emeritus





Forum Nav Content I Follow