Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Playmakers: New ESPN series--anybody watch?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
9 replies to this topic

#1 of 10 OFFLINE   Lew Crippen

Lew Crippen

    Executive Producer



  • 12,060 posts
  • Join Date: May 19 2002

Posted August 28 2003 - 02:11 AM

My wife talked me into watching the new ESPN series last Tuesday night and it was pretty decent. Did anybody else watch this?

This is sort of a North Dallas Forty updated, in that it shows a pretty dark side of pro football. I was surprised, as I expected that ESPN would have a series that promoted football—not one which was critical.
¡Time is not my master!

#2 of 10 OFFLINE   Tommy Ceez

Tommy Ceez

    Second Unit



  • 436 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 16 2002

Posted August 28 2003 - 03:04 AM

http://msn.espn.go.c...ons/030826.html

Heres a review from the worlds foremost expert on sports related entertainment and a man who knows bad TV and Movies...The sports Guy
"We seem to be getting closer and closer to a situation where nobody is responsible for what they did but we are all responsible for what someone else did." - Thomas Sowell

#3 of 10 OFFLINE   Tim Markley

Tim Markley

    Screenwriter



  • 1,279 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 12 1999

Posted August 28 2003 - 03:46 AM

I watched it and thought it was decent. I've got a Season Pass set up on the Tivo now.

#4 of 10 OFFLINE   PeteyG

PeteyG

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 99 posts
  • Join Date: May 23 2000

Posted August 28 2003 - 06:10 AM

I was wondering if anyone was going to start a thread on this. . .

Tommy,

I read the Sports Guy's review the other day before it aired, and as always, he hit right it on the head. I thought the show was o.k., but feel they could do much more with it. Not quite sure if I like how over the top it is in some aspects (DH getting high and getting to the game within seconds of the kickoff), but it was certainly entertaining and I will watch it in the upcoming weeks.

I probably would have enjoyed it more if Time Warner would get their act together and get ESPNHD in NYC!!!Posted Image

Pete
"If we weren't all crazy, we'd all go insane."

#5 of 10 OFFLINE   Lew Crippen

Lew Crippen

    Executive Producer



  • 12,060 posts
  • Join Date: May 19 2002

Posted August 28 2003 - 06:14 AM

I’m actually a bit on the fence right now. This seems to be a series that could degenerate into the same old thing every week (and done less well every week), or it could turn out to be quite good.

Right now I’m not concerned that there was only just a little shown of the owner/coach conflict. I expect that if the series develops well, areas like that can be a source of real conflict and tension. On the other hand, if we get more each week of the linebacker continuing to have flashbacks it will probably go downhill.
¡Time is not my master!

#6 of 10 OFFLINE   Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul



  • 37,848 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted August 28 2003 - 07:20 AM

Didn't like it all that much, thought the direction was uninspired, as were the performances. Plus the voiceovers were just tiresome. And yes, it irks me to see that some people can practically get away with just about anything because they can pile up the yards in a game, or score a ton of points.
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#7 of 10 OFFLINE   Jonny P

Jonny P

    Supporting Actor



  • 649 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 05 2002

Posted August 28 2003 - 07:35 AM

"Playmakers" is an attempt to do the movie "Any Given Sunday" as a weekly series in the vain of upstart basic cable dramas like "The Shield," "Nip/Tuck," "Monk," "The Dead Zone"...etc.

On thing that annoys the bejeesuz out of me in shows is narration like this show has. Personally, I would rather see characters in action and gauge what sort of person they are and what their pain is through what they do and how they interact with the other characters.

It is better to show...not tell. When narration is done, it means that they were concerned people wouldn't get it.

What it really means is that they need to do a better job of punching up the scripts. We don't need narration to understand a character's inner turmoil.

I can't understand half of what is going on on "ER", but I don't need to have it explained to me.

They should let the story unfold and let us decide for ourselves. I would prefer morally ambiguous characters. Instead, the show uses narration to make us believe that certain characters are more virtuous than others.

Cut the narration and the show could become an intriguing drama. Obviously, it is on ESPN so I am not expecting "The Sopranos" or "ER", but I think that there is potential there to create a buzzworthy drama on ESPN.

It will require greater character development and a certain amount of moral and ethical ambiguity. It already does that, but it will have to go further.

#8 of 10 OFFLINE   GlennH

GlennH

    Screenwriter



  • 2,126 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 28 1998
  • Real Name:Glenn

Posted August 28 2003 - 04:34 PM

Some reactions (mostly negative) from some real players on the Pittsburgh Steelers.

#9 of 10 OFFLINE   Diallo B

Diallo B

    Screenwriter



  • 1,076 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 18 2002

Posted August 28 2003 - 05:06 PM

Over the top. Yes.
Hyperbole. Maybe.
Not rooted in reality. No.

You better beleive that stuff like what happened in Playmakers goes on. Although not a football player myself, I have hung out in college and still hangout on occasion with football players; college and pro. You should see the parties. Many of you may wish you were there. You should see the women, drugs and all the other stuff that goes on the night before a game, on gameday and definitely after the game.

I think the problem with Playmakers was that they tried to put it all on one team in the first episode. It was like collecting punch after punch after punch from a Mike Tyson in his prime. It just bowled you over.

For you folks talking about it ain't real, you need to see the light. Plenty of players have played high and or drunk. And although you can bet that the front office will keep it on the hush you better believe that someone has shown up to a game within the hour before the game and still played. Let's say a healthy Mike Vick/T. Owens/Rich Gannon/Peyton Manning showed up at the 11th hour with no explanation. Do you really think that they will not play. Seriously......... get real.

Anyway, I enjoyed the show. I can definitely keep it in perspective and understand that it is Hollywood. But please beleive that this stuff is based in reality and not all fiction. As for those Pittsburgh Steeler comments, what did you expect them to say? I agree that the writers could have attempted to at least portray some positive aspect of pro football. But come on! It was the first episode. Let's see if the next few episodes have something positive to say.

I will be watching next Tuesday. The look on the faces of the players before the drug test in the preview was too funny for me.

djb
listen with your own ears...
watch with your own eyes...
make your own decision.
_______________________________________

#10 of 10 OFFLINE   Lew Crippen

Lew Crippen

    Executive Producer



  • 12,060 posts
  • Join Date: May 19 2002

Posted August 29 2003 - 01:57 AM

It actually sounds as though it was my Dallas Cowboys of the last few years. True, no doubt Parcells would not have let the zoned out RB start because he was late, nor would have Tom Landry—but we have had other coaches. Posted Image

And so far, unlike the Cowboys no one has actually killed anyone else or been arrested and gone to prison for drugs.
¡Time is not my master!