-

Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Pete Rose back in baseball


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
37 replies to this topic

#1 of 38 Jose Arellano

Jose Arellano

    Agent

  • 44 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 23 2001

Posted August 12 2003 - 08:16 AM

Thoughts on this?

Pete Rose Returns

#2 of 38 Michael St. Clair

Michael St. Clair

    Producer

  • 6,009 posts
  • Join Date: May 03 1999

Posted August 12 2003 - 08:44 AM

Baseball denies it.

I'm also a lifelong Reds fan who fears Pete coming to manage the team. Attendance would improve, but I don't want all that baggage.

#3 of 38 RobertR

RobertR

    Lead Actor

  • 9,457 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 19 1998

Posted August 12 2003 - 08:53 AM

The story sounds very suspect. Why would baseball allow Rose back in without requiring an admission of wrongdoing? They'd look like idiots.

#4 of 38 Peter Kline

Peter Kline

    Screenwriter

  • 2,409 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 09 1999

Posted August 12 2003 - 09:45 AM

I agree with my photographer RobertR, the story sounds bogus.

#5 of 38 LewB

LewB

    Screenwriter

  • 1,282 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 11 2002

Posted August 12 2003 - 10:18 AM

I hate to say that I think Pete Rose should never be allowed into the HOF. I think he was one of the greatest to play the game and I'd show future players the way he played, he left everything he had between the lines every day.
Baseball had the 'Black Sox' scandal at the beginning of the 1900's and it almost took the game down forever. Judge Landis and Babe Ruth are frequently given credit for saving the game. I believe that there were also 'point shaving' scandals involving the CCNY basketball team when they were both NIT and NCAA champs.
Baseball forgives the drug addicts, the spouse beaters, the primadonnas, the expectorators (sp?) and lots more. I feel that baseball or any other sport CAN NOT condone gambling on it by it's participants. The results of the games must in no way be made suspect by the possibility that they were influenced by gambling.

#6 of 38 JustinCleveland

JustinCleveland

    Screenwriter

  • 2,059 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 23 2002
  • Real Name:Justin Cleveland
  • LocationMadison, WI

Posted August 12 2003 - 10:26 AM

I just saw ESPN reporting on it, and I think it's possible.

Bottom line, I think the ban should be lifted, but I don't think he should coach. Let the guy in the hall of fame, he's earned it.

#7 of 38 Peter Kline

Peter Kline

    Screenwriter

  • 2,409 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 09 1999

Posted August 12 2003 - 10:45 AM

He belongs in the HOF. He was a great player. He does not belong in baseball in any other capacity. I'm afraid he is self-deluding. He still frequents gambling casinos.

#8 of 38 Scott Merryfield

Scott Merryfield

    Executive Producer

  • 10,397 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 16 1998
  • LocationMichigan

Posted August 12 2003 - 11:17 AM

If Pete Rose gets in the HOF, then Shoeless Joe Jackson should be admitted at the same time.

#9 of 38 Tim Morton

Tim Morton

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 212 posts
  • Join Date: May 05 2000

Posted August 12 2003 - 11:23 AM

Why is it wrong to bet on your own team? I think he would be a goldmine for baseball if he could manage the reds back into the playoffs.

#10 of 38 Joseph S

Joseph S

    Screenwriter

  • 2,865 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 23 1999

Posted August 12 2003 - 11:29 AM

Quote:
If Pete Rose gets in the HOF, then Shoeless Joe Jackson should be admitted at the same time.

Sounds great and add Tiant and Rice too. How about Selig in jail for fraud charges the same day? Posted Image

#11 of 38 RobertR

RobertR

    Lead Actor

  • 9,457 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 19 1998

Posted August 12 2003 - 11:53 AM

Quote:
Why is it wrong to bet on your own team?

It's absolutely wrong to allow gambling considerations to influence game decisions. A coach or player has NO business whatsoever allowing considerations of the "spread", etc. to enter into his thinking. It corrupts the game.

#12 of 38 Mick Wright

Mick Wright

    Second Unit

  • 351 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 10 2000

Posted August 12 2003 - 12:58 PM

Quote:
Why is it wrong to bet on your own team?
Even if you only bet FOR your team, the days you don't bet, you're effectively betting against your team.
"What the eyes see and the ears hear, the mind believes."

#13 of 38 Jeremy_Watson

Jeremy_Watson

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 249 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 30 2002

Posted August 12 2003 - 01:00 PM

I don't understand the logic of letting him back into baseball (or even the HOF) if he admits to wrongdoing. The only leg he has to stand on now is that he still denies it and was never convicted of it by a jury, there was just strong evidence that he did (no criminal case was ever filed). If he admits to committing the cardinal sin of baseball, why would people want him back more. Much of his memorabilia is in the HOF as it should be, but putting his plaque up there should not be allowed in my opinion.

#14 of 38 Jason Seaver

Jason Seaver

    Lead Actor

  • 9,306 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted August 12 2003 - 04:22 PM

Quote:
Why is it wrong to bet on your own team?
Consider a hypothetical situation where Pete Rose has bet on his own team, but has a young starting pitcher on the mound, who threw over 100 pitches in his last start. He might be tempted to keep the kid in long enough to cause serious injury, especially if he's placing bets on a regular basis. Or he might send his best reliever out every day without any concern for the guy's arm. He wouldn't have as much concern for any of his responsibilities to the team and players other than winning this game right now.
Jay's Movie Blog - A movie-viewing diary.
Transplanted Life: Sci-fi soap opera about a man placed in a new body, updated two or three times a week.
Trading Post Inn - Another gender-bending soap, with different collaborators writing different points of view.

"What? Since when was this an energy...

#15 of 38 Allen_Appel

Allen_Appel

    Second Unit

  • 418 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 13 2002

Posted August 12 2003 - 05:22 PM

Quote:
Let the guy in the hall of fame, he's earned it.
Keep the guy out of the hall of fame, he forfeited it.

#16 of 38 Robert Ma

Robert Ma

    Second Unit

  • 370 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 18 2001

Posted August 12 2003 - 05:38 PM

If you bet on the game....
you don't belong in the hall of fame.


#17 of 38 Bill J

Bill J

    Producer

  • 3,970 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 27 2001

Posted August 12 2003 - 06:13 PM

Well, what about cheating? I would think that is far more serious than betting on the game. Do you think Sammy Sosa deserves to be inducted now?

#18 of 38 Brian Perry

Brian Perry

    Screenwriter

  • 2,815 posts
  • Join Date: May 06 1999

Posted August 12 2003 - 06:13 PM

My opinion:

Betting FOR one's own team is a bad practice, but is nowhere near as heinous as betting AGAINST your own team. That's the difference between Rose and Shoeless Joe (notwithstanding any evidence in either case). There's simply no comparison in that regard.

For the sake of argument, let's say it was discovered that Michael Jordan intentionally missed a last-second shot so his team would lose a game. Compare that scenario with Jordan intentionally missing a last-second basket in a game his team wins by 29 when the spread was 30. Both examples might be commonly referred to as point-shaving, but in reality the first example is not point-shaving at all, but rather game-throwing.

Rose is guilty of very poor judgment and has served over ten years punishment. He belongs in the Hall, but should not be allowed back in the game (i.e., managing).

#19 of 38 Michael St. Clair

Michael St. Clair

    Producer

  • 6,009 posts
  • Join Date: May 03 1999

Posted August 12 2003 - 09:27 PM

In the hall, yes, in the game, no.

#20 of 38 Lee L

Lee L

    Supporting Actor

  • 868 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2000

Posted August 13 2003 - 01:07 AM

I think the ban should stay although I would not be too upset if in a few years they did eventually let him into the HOF. I can't possibly see him being let in to work in any capacity, that would be a true travesty and would ruin the last tiny bit of respect I have for Baseball.

Really, when it comes down to it, any player or manager who gambles at all is doing it illegally unless they are driving to Vegas to place the bets so their judgement is questionable. Now, they are dealing with people with illegal prfessions connected to who knows what organized crime figures and needing to keep that a secret. Who is to say that a little pressure can;t be provided on someone to miss that free throw or drop that long fly to ensure the winning team goes up by one more run? Anyone who is caught gambling at all should be banned in an ideal world.

I think that corkers should be banned as well.
Revenge is like serving cold cuts-

Tony Soprano


Back to After Hours Lounge



Forum Nav Content I Follow