Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

why does a 36' tv cost as much as a 50' tv


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10 replies to this topic

#1 of 11 JohnPhi

JohnPhi

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 195 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 12 2003

Posted May 29 2003 - 01:03 AM

I was wondering why tub televisions seem to cost as much as the big screen tv's. You would think that the big screens would out cost them

#2 of 11 Josh_SR

Josh_SR

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 105 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 21 2003

Posted May 29 2003 - 01:35 AM

Sup peeps

the tube tv's are much more clearer then the big screens....

#3 of 11 JohnPhi

JohnPhi

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 195 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 12 2003

Posted May 29 2003 - 01:40 AM

so it is picture quality that is the reason

#4 of 11 Michael Reuben

Michael Reuben

    Studio Mogul

  • 21,769 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 12 1998

Posted May 29 2003 - 01:49 AM

Quote:
I was wondering why tub televisions seem to cost as much as the big screen tv's.

What are you comparing? From the same manufacturer and within the same line, I haven't seen tube prices and rear-projection prices that are equal. OTOH, if you want to compare a top-of-the-line tube set with a middling RPTV, I'm sure you can find comparable prices.

Quote:
the tube tv's are much more clearer then the big screens....

Nonsense.

M.
COMPLETE list of my disc reviews.       HTF Rules / 200920102011 Film Lists

#5 of 11 Michael TLV

Michael TLV

    Screenwriter

  • 2,909 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 2000
  • Real Name:Michael Chen
  • LocationCalgary, Alberta

Posted May 29 2003 - 01:48 AM

Greetings

I don't know ... the last time I looked at a 34" tube set, it was much less expensive than a 65" w/s RPTV.

A 47" RPTV can be had for $1000 to $1300 now ... while the 34" tube is still up around $2000. Material costs. big tubes cost $$.

Direct View Tube sets are not inherently "clearer" than RPTV's. That is a myth. Most RPTV's are capable of displaying much more image resolution than the typical directview tube design.

Regards
Michael @ The Laser Video Experience
THX Video Systems Instructor/ISF Instructor
Lion A/V Consultants Network - TLVEXP.com


#6 of 11 Jeff Gatie

Jeff Gatie

    Lead Actor

  • 6,529 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 19 2002

Posted May 29 2003 - 01:57 AM

Tube televisions are by no means "clearer" than RPTV's In fact, some tubes have masks that limit resolution and make it less "clear". The actual resolution of a TV has nothing to do with direct view vs. RPTV. The reason tubes look "clearer" is because the picture is smaller, meaning the lines of resolution are contained in a smaller space, thus any imperfections are hidden. A large screen, having more real estate and the same lines of resolution, shows imperfections and scanlines more easily, at a greater distance. Think a direct view is "clearer"? Sit 3 feet from it and you'll see scanlines just as you would sitting 5 ft from my 56" RPTV.

The difference in price between the two is easy to explain - Large tube TV's are more difficult to manufacture, more expensive to manufacture and extremely heavy (expensive) to ship. RPTV's have no heavy, expensive vacuum tubes, so they can be made lighter and less expensive for a larger picture size.

#7 of 11 Josh_SR

Josh_SR

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 105 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 21 2003

Posted May 29 2003 - 03:57 PM

well..... shows how much i know Posted Image

#8 of 11 John-Miles

John-Miles

    Screenwriter

  • 1,201 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 29 2001

Posted May 29 2003 - 11:04 PM

Like some fo the above posts said its all in the materials and manufacturing costs. heheheh just try to lift a 36" tv and a 43" RPTV, big difference there Posted Image
Cheers

John

#9 of 11 Jeremy Tebo

Jeremy Tebo

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 74 posts
  • Join Date: May 05 2003

Posted May 30 2003 - 09:57 AM

Tubes might not be clearer, but IMO they look much better. I would say the brightness is a big part of it. When you look at an RPTV from an angle, it looks like crap. When you look at a nice flat screen CRT from an angle, it still looks good. Must be a lot of RPTV owners in here...

#10 of 11 Sean Stashuk

Sean Stashuk

    Auditioning

  • 3 posts
  • Join Date: May 30 2003

Posted May 30 2003 - 10:38 AM

It's true that RPTV's have a 'limited' viewing angle, but the new RP HDTV's are MUCH better in this respect than the projections from a few years ago. Now of course I am talking about horizontal viewing radius, and on my tv I can sit at a 150 degree angle from the tv and still see a decent picture. Now the vertical problem is still there, but who watches tv standing up?

#11 of 11 Jeremy Tebo

Jeremy Tebo

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 74 posts
  • Join Date: May 05 2003

Posted May 30 2003 - 12:31 PM

I have noticed that RPTV's have improved quite a bit over the last few years, they used to be really bad in that aspect. Some are brighter than others, I'm sure you get what you pay for. Still, I don't think they look as good as a nice CRT. When I had the decision to make, I went for the Sony 36HS500 instead of an RPTV. I really like it, and I don't think it gets much better for video games. (Space was also an issue) I would get a front projector before I got an RPTV. I say, if you're gonna go big, go BIG.





Forum Nav Content I Follow