Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

DVD: Panny RP91, RP82, XP30 or H/K 25?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
6 replies to this topic

#1 of 7 OFFLINE   Alex_C

Alex_C

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 123 posts
  • Join Date: May 12 2003

Posted May 22 2003 - 02:52 PM

I've been buzzing around the forum looking for tips. I've seen a lot about these players. I just through the H/K in there cause I just bought a 525. Don't know anything about that one.

Which would you choose? I'll spend up to $300 or so.

I'm running a 65" Mits.

#2 of 7 OFFLINE   Scott Merryfield

Scott Merryfield

    Executive Producer



  • 10,620 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 16 1998
  • LocationMichigan

Posted May 23 2003 - 12:16 AM

If your Mitsubishi locks into FULL viewing mode when receiving a 480p video signal, then the RP-91 would be a great choice because of its built-in aspect ratio/scaling function. Even if it does not "lock into FULL", the scaling function is still very useful with a 16x9 display. There are only a few players on the market that provide this scaling function, and even fewer that work with improperly flagged non-anamporphic widescreen discs.

The downside of the RP-91 is that its deinterlacing performance is not as good as the RP-82 and XP-30, which each use a Faroudja deinterlacing chip. However, those two models do not provide the scaling function of the RP-91.

#3 of 7 OFFLINE   Alex_C

Alex_C

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 123 posts
  • Join Date: May 12 2003

Posted May 23 2003 - 04:00 AM

Should the deinterlacing performace be a concern?
If not, you're saying definitley go with the RP91, right?

Do you know anything about the CP-72 (multidisk)? How does it compare to the 91 and 82?

Thanks for your help.

#4 of 7 OFFLINE   Marcel_V

Marcel_V

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 51 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 24 2003

Posted May 23 2003 - 05:18 AM

The CP72 gives about the same performance as the RP82, since they share the same chipset. Some think the 82 gives a *slighty* better picture, but its tough to notice.

Also, not to be rude but these topics have been covered quite a bit in other threads. You should use the search function and all sorts of stuff will come up about these players Posted Image

#5 of 7 OFFLINE   Marcel_V

Marcel_V

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 51 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 24 2003

Posted May 23 2003 - 07:08 AM

Its a better player, almost the same as RP82 but no DVD-A

#6 of 7 OFFLINE   ManW_TheUncool

ManW_TheUncool

    Producer



  • 5,870 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 18 2001
  • Real Name:ManW

Posted May 23 2003 - 07:36 AM

Anyone considering PQ for progressive scan DVD output should make this a must-read:

http://www.hometheat....e-10-2000.html

This will help you decide whether top notch deinterlacing is a must-have for you. Not everyone feels that it's as important as say aspect ratio scaling. It depends a lot on what DVDs you will watch on what kind of display at what distance-to-screen-size ratio and such factors.

For example, if you watch very few non-anamorphic DVDs, then you probably don't need to be concerned about scaling.

If you only watch film-sourced DVDs, especially reasonably well encoded DVDs, and don't care much about PQ for DVD extras and such, then top notch deinterlacing might not be quite as important.

If your distance-to-screen-size ratio is high, eg. maybe >3:1, then most of these PQ issues will matter less as well. Even if you have a 65" RPTV, your ratio could still be something as high as 4:1 (or 20ft distance), thus rendering the matter insignificant.

Again, there are plenty of reasons to choose one player over another since NONE are truly perfect for the realworld where the quality of DVDs (and DVD encoding) PLUS the viewing context of the individual vary so much. At one point, I hoped the Philips 963sa (at $400) would be IT, but alas...

_Man_

Just another amateur learning to paint w/ "the light of the world".

"Whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything worthy of praise, dwell on these things..." (St. Paul)

#7 of 7 OFFLINE   Donnie Eldridge

Donnie Eldridge

    Supporting Actor



  • 765 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 03 2001

Posted May 23 2003 - 08:29 AM

I'll second the RP-91. The deinterlacing isn't as good as the newer models, but it's not inferior either. Also, the built quality of the RP-91 is superior to that of the newer Pannys. The new models feel cheap and are light as a feather. The same can't be said of the RP-91.
Master Poe: Close your eyes. What do you hear?
Caine: I hear the water. I hear the birds.
Master Poe: Do you hear your own heart beat.
Caine: No.
Master Poe: Do you hear the grasshopper, which is at your feet.Caine: Old man, how is it that you hear these things?Master Poe: Young man, how is it...