Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

FM reception

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 of 3 OFFLINE   Les Palmer

Les Palmer


  • 2 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2003

Posted May 07 2003 - 06:55 AM

Something I've always wondered: Why do cheap portable radios get better FM reception than receivers? My current receiver, a Panasonic SA-HE100, gets pitiful reception (with the exception of one station that plays nothing but rap). Same with the Kenwood AR-A4040 that it replaced. I have correctly installed the vinyl-covered wire antenna that came with the HE100, so that's not the problem. How do I improve the reception?

#2 of 3 OFFLINE   Jeremy Little

Jeremy Little

    Supporting Actor

  • 772 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 09 2001

Posted May 07 2003 - 07:03 AM

Umm, that wire could be the problem. It does not have the same reception quality as the telescoping antenna of a boombox. I bought an inexpensive add-on antenna that cleared all my reception problems up.
If it wasn't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college.

#3 of 3 OFFLINE   Wayne A. Pflughaupt

Wayne A. Pflughaupt


  • 5,937 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 05 1999
  • Real Name:Wayne
  • LocationKaty, TX

Posted May 07 2003 - 08:47 AM

Les, Jeremy is right. The dipole antennas that come with receivers are directional, so unless the wall you’re hanging it on happens to be oriented on the proper axis for the station you’re trying to receive, your reception will be a hit-and-miss proposition. Especially if you live some distance from the station. Regards, Wayne A. Pflughaupt
My Equipment List
“A nice mid-fi system,” according to an audiophile acquaintance.

My Tech / DIY Articles and Reviews

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users