-

Jump to content



Photo

New Dances With Wolves review at DVDfile


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
32 replies to this topic

#1 of 33 OFFLINE   Michael Henry

Michael Henry

    Second Unit

  • 356 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 28 2000
  • Real Name:J. Michael Henry
  • LocationDallas, TX

Posted April 21 2003 - 01:34 AM

Here is the link...

Anyone considering replacing their DTS 2-disk set from Image? The new footage may push me, but, I'm still not sure...
J. Michael Henry

 


#2 of 33 OFFLINE   Scott David

Scott David

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 183 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 09 2001

Posted April 21 2003 - 01:46 AM

I used to own the laserdisc box set with the four-hour version, and while it has a few interesting additions, many scenes from the new footage were simply redundant, so I still prefer the original three-hour version. However, after reading that review on DVD File, the new DVD seems worth purchasing for the extras alone...so I'm on the fence.

#3 of 33 OFFLINE   Lou Sytsma

Lou Sytsma

    Producer

  • 5,265 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 01 1998

Posted April 21 2003 - 02:46 AM

If the extra footage is deemed redundant - which it appears to be - I'll pass on this one.
Every man is my superior, in that I may learn from him.

#4 of 33 OFFLINE   Robert_eb

Robert_eb

    Supporting Actor

  • 967 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 14 2001

Posted April 21 2003 - 03:50 AM

I own the two disc dts version and wasn't planning on upgrading. I used to own the extended version laserdisc and I'm familiar with the added scenes. I'm torn because the 82 minute documentary sounds interesting to me and the two new screen-specific audio commentaries that are included, the first with Kevin Costner and producer Jim Wilson, and the second with director of photography Dean Semler and the editor Neil Travis has really picked my interest. I may wait until after the release and see if I can find this on ebay for a lighter price unless there's a good deal on a preorder price.

#5 of 33 OFFLINE   Doug Schiller

Doug Schiller

    Supporting Actor

  • 767 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 16 1998

Posted April 21 2003 - 03:55 AM

Yea! DVD-18. Kudos to MGM for still using this great format.

Doug

#6 of 33 OFFLINE   Craig S

Craig S

    Producer

  • 5,508 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 04 2000
  • Real Name:Craig Seanor
  • LocationLeague City, Texas

Posted April 21 2003 - 03:58 AM

I have the existing Image disc and I'll be buying the new one - but not to replace the Image. It will sit right there on the shelf next to the original, just like Apocalypse Now & AN Redux, and The Exorcist & TVYNS. I am a completist!

I'll be buying the new one because (1) I've never seen the extended version, and (2) the new commentary & docu both sound excellent.

Three truths about movies, as noted by Roger Ebert:

 

* It's not what a movie is about, it's how it is about it.

* No good movie is too long, and no bad movie is short enough.

* No good movie is depressing, all bad movies are depressing.


#7 of 33 OFFLINE   Jon_W

Jon_W

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 241 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 19 2000

Posted April 21 2003 - 04:00 AM

I own the original Image release plus the DTS version and I plan to buy this relesase too. I myself do not see the purcahse as an either or proposition. I think Dances With Wolves and Dances With Wolves: Extended Cut should be seen as two separate things, if two separate films. I will never get rid of my DTS version because I think the picture and sound quality of that release are amazing. I also will not get rid of the original Image release because it has the theatrical version all on one disc. I like what I read in the review, but man the review was poorly done in many ways. That sloppy cut and paste job in the first section, come on. DVDfile quality over speed, please!
"You Ain't Been Doin' Nothin' If You Ain't Been Called A Red" - Eliot Kenin, 1983

#8 of 33 OFFLINE   Jeff Ulmer

Jeff Ulmer

    Producer

  • 5,593 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 23 1998

Posted April 21 2003 - 04:26 AM

I'll be getting the new one (eventually) to go alongside the original and my LD box set. I still don't see how they can advertise the long cut as an Oscar winner though - it's a different movie.

#9 of 33 OFFLINE   PaulP

PaulP

    Producer

  • 3,291 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 22 2001

Posted April 21 2003 - 04:57 AM

Much like with Lord of the Rings releases, I wanna have both versions. Firstly, it's two different cuts of the film, and secondly, there are different extras. If 2 new commentaries and an 82-minute doc (not to mention the extended cut) don't sway you, I really don't know what will.

#10 of 33 OFFLINE   Tom Tsai

Tom Tsai

    Supporting Actor

  • 565 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 13 2002

Posted April 21 2003 - 05:13 AM

For the original theatrical cut...which one do you guys recommend? The DD or the DTS?

#11 of 33 OFFLINE   Joshua Moran

Joshua Moran

    Supporting Actor

  • 506 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 11 2000

Posted April 21 2003 - 05:23 AM

I am going to purchase this. I won't be replacing the DTS version though. But I do want to check this version out and the Documentary that comes along.

#12 of 33 OFFLINE   Steve_Tk

Steve_Tk

    Screenwriter

  • 2,833 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 30 2002

Posted April 21 2003 - 05:41 AM

I'm on the fence about added footage. In some movies, like T2 I thought the added footage was stupid, and will never watch it again. But in cases like LOTR:EE, I probably will never watch the original again.

I loved this movie so I'll give this a shot.

#13 of 33 OFFLINE   DaViD Boulet

DaViD Boulet

    Lead Actor

  • 8,805 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 1999

Posted April 21 2003 - 07:03 AM

Anyone know where I can get the DTS theatrical cut that image produced (now OOP)?

-dave
Be an Original Aspect Ratio Advocate

Supporter of 1080p24 video and lossless 24 bit audio.

#14 of 33 OFFLINE   svenge

svenge

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 153 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 02 2003

Posted April 21 2003 - 07:30 AM

www.koreandvds.com has the DTS theatrical cut (of course in R3, but still...)

#15 of 33 OFFLINE   Ronald Epstein

Ronald Epstein

    Studio Mogul

  • 39,937 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 03 1997

Posted April 21 2003 - 08:31 AM

Working on our review as we speak.

Ronald J Epstein
Home Theater Forum co-owner

 

gallery_269895_23_10043.jpg Click Here for the latest/hottest Blu-ray Preorders gallery_269895_23_1316.jpg Click Here for our complete Blu-ray review archive

gallery_269895_23_773.jpg Click Here for our complete 3D Blu-ray review archive gallery_269895_23_992.jpgClick Here for our complete DVD review archive

gallery_269895_23_7246.jpg Click Here for Blu-Ray Preorder Release Schedule gallery_269895_23_3120.jpg Click Here for forum posting rules and regulations


#16 of 33 OFFLINE   Phil Dally

Phil Dally

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 121 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 09 2003

Posted April 21 2003 - 09:01 AM

I suppose the next one will be SE with DTS.
My DVD Collection

http://www.dvdprofil....?alias=pedally

What goes good with Home Theaters?http://store.yahoo.c....c2 index.html

#17 of 33 OFFLINE   Shane Martin

Shane Martin

    Producer

  • 6,017 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 1999

Posted April 21 2003 - 09:15 AM

Quote:
Anyone know where I can get the DTS theatrical cut that image produced (now OOP)?
I've seen them at Best Buy. They have had a ton of them. Might check there. I could look around here if you want. Just PM if you need me to.

I've seen the original Image and the DTS and indeed the Full bitrate DTS is better IMHO. The image is stellar with the ONLY caveat being its on 2 discs. NO big deal IMHO with its length.

I may rent the Extended Cut but I don't plan on buying it. I didn't like the movie THAT much to rebuy it. I liked it enough to buy the DTS original version and have seen it 3 times now since then(couple months).

#18 of 33 OFFLINE   Adam Barratt

Adam Barratt

    Screenwriter

  • 2,344 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 16 1998

Posted April 21 2003 - 10:14 AM

Quote:
But here we are in 1998...

Que?

Adam

#19 of 33 OFFLINE   Damin J Toell

Damin J Toell

    Producer

  • 3,761 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 07 2001

Posted April 21 2003 - 10:16 AM

Quote:
Que?


I e-mailed Peter about that last night. The review also originally said that Dances won Oscars in 1987. He corrected one, but not the other. That text is from the review of the older Image release. The old review still has the 1987 error.

DJ

#20 of 33 OFFLINE   oscar_merkx

oscar_merkx

    Lead Actor

  • 7,632 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 15 2002

Posted April 21 2003 - 10:32 AM

I will be getting this version because I like the 4 hour version and have not seen the 82 min docu

Posted Image
Toastmasters International

Communication is Everything





Forum Nav Content I Follow