Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


A question regarding TV on DVD

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 of 6 OFFLINE   Nicholas Martin

Nicholas Martin


  • 2,683 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 18 2003

Posted April 15 2003 - 08:42 AM

Does anyone have any theories as to why some TV box sets cost more than others? It couldn't possibly have to do with the quality of the shows themselves. One box set of "Angel"(my favorite series) is a critical favorite as well, and has not reached syndication yet. It's cost: around $50 for 22 episodes. One box set of "The X-Files" or "Star Trek TNG", both have praise and have been syndicated for years. (TNG is on television almost too often) Yet a box of 22-26 episodes cost around $100-$200 each, why? because of three or four more episodes? So why the big differences in price?

#2 of 6 OFFLINE   Jason Seaver

Jason Seaver

    Lead Actor

  • 9,306 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted April 15 2003 - 08:56 AM

(A) Back-end royalties. The casts and crews of The X-Files and Star Trek could quite possibly have negotiated themselves a good chunk of royalties for video sales. (B) What the market will bear. More people are willing to pay more money for these shows, at least initially - there's really not much precedent for these sets dropping in price yet.
Jay's Movie Blog - A movie-viewing diary.
Transplanted Life: Sci-fi soap opera about a man placed in a new body, updated two or three times a week.
Trading Post Inn - Another gender-bending soap, with different collaborators writing different points of view.

"What? Since when was this an energy...

#3 of 6 OFFLINE   LennyP


    Supporting Actor

  • 587 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 20 2002

Posted April 15 2003 - 08:57 AM

Well, most of the ones you're asking about are from the same company, Fox, so you'd think the prices would be about the same, but The Shield and 24 are more of a marketing releases and need to be cheaper to promote their 2nd seasons, plus some like Buffy and Angel are more mainstream, and therefore have loads of casual viewers that need to be enticed into buying by a lower price. They still make money because it's very cheap to duplicate discs themselves, packaging probably costs more than all the discs inside. But with X-Files and Star Trek TNG & DS9, you got an army of geeks that they figure they can rip off that will pay anything to get the full seasons, therefore $150 retail.
Top: 1-10 | 11-20 | Complete Archives | Discs: 1397
New R1: Cube SE | Cube² | Noir Vol.1 | .hack//Sign Vol.1 | RahXephon Vol.1 | Assassins | Judge Dredd | One Hour Photo | Unfaithful

#4 of 6 OFFLINE   Matt Pasant

Matt Pasant

    Second Unit

  • 495 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 16 2001

Posted April 15 2003 - 08:57 AM

It could be because shows like TNG or X-Files have such a built in audience and that $100 is where the supply and demand curve intersect for the demographics targeted. - Matt

#5 of 6 OFFLINE   David Lambert

David Lambert

    Executive Producer

  • 11,386 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 2001

Posted April 15 2003 - 11:36 AM

[quote] It could be because shows like TNG or X-Files have such a built in audience and that $100 is where the supply and demand curve intersect for the demographics targeted. [quote]

It could be because of the exorbitant amounts of money that Duchovny, Stewart, and Spiner negotiated...crafty guys! Posted Image

DAVE/Memphis, TN

...Want to see your favorite show on DVD?

#6 of 6 OFFLINE   Jeff Kleist

Jeff Kleist

    Executive Producer

  • 11,286 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 04 1999

Posted April 15 2003 - 11:39 AM

Basically correct- Back-end royalties eat up a HUGE chunk. Buffy/Angel and other Fox shows are more or less on standard SAG deals, not like TNG where about $30/set is eaten up in Cast/Crew royalties

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users