-

Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Timeline: Trailer Up and it looks pretty solid!


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
21 replies to this topic

#1 of 22 OFFLINE   Scott Weinberg

Scott Weinberg

    Lead Actor

  • 7,482 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 03 2000

Posted April 12 2003 - 09:51 AM

Have a look:

http://www.moviefone....t=qt&x=13&y=12

Hits screens Nov. 26th.

I read the book. Fun stuff. Donner's the perfect director for something like this.

#2 of 22 OFFLINE   WillG

WillG

    Producer

  • 5,219 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 2003

Posted April 12 2003 - 12:05 PM

Interesting, but just from the trailer, I can see that some liberties from the book have been taken. I don't recall anyone's "Father" needing to be rescued in the book. Was Crichton involved with the movie in any way, (Producer, Screenplay)?
STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!

#3 of 22 OFFLINE   Phil Florian

Phil Florian

    Screenwriter

  • 1,190 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 10 2001

Posted April 12 2003 - 02:41 PM

I don't know if it was anyone's father, but there was a Professor that needed rescuing. I couldn't finish the book, sadly. All of Cricton's stuff reads like the screenplays they will end up being (in fact, "Timeline" rights were bought before the book was published!) and that isn't a good thing. The original book for "Jurassic Park" was an amazingly fun book and had a lot in it. The movie had to cut a lot but it worked as an adaptation. The second novel was horrible because it was obviously written to be a movie and it read like that. Gah. I may try it again before the movie because the premise is a hoot, but gosh he is a bad writer. Say what you want of the prolific King, he still knows how to write a book. Cricton on the other hand...feh.

Phil

#4 of 22 OFFLINE   WillG

WillG

    Producer

  • 5,219 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 2003

Posted April 12 2003 - 04:00 PM

I have to disagree with you there. I hardly think he has become a bad writer. I know I finished his latest nover "Prey" within a couple of days, so obviously I'm still interested in his writing. Hollywood or not, he keeps you reading. "Jurassic Park" Certainly wasn't the first movie to be made from one of his books. And it wasn't the first movie that he was involved in. He already had a few films that he directed himself under his belt. And another thing is that many of his film adaptations were so different from his books anyway. "Jurassic Park" the movie had alot missing that was in the book. "The Lost World," even though I won't argue was a payoff, the Book and Movie only had one part in common. "Sphere" came close, storywise but the movie was executed poorly. So even though, as you put it, his books are reading like screenplays, the movies definately don't turn out to be carbon copies. I mean, at least each novel has a different story, unlike, I guess you could say, his rival in their heydays, John Grisham where the description of practially every one of his novels starts out with "A young Memphis Lawyer"
STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!

#5 of 22 OFFLINE   Kristoffer

Kristoffer

    Second Unit

  • 460 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 07 2002

Posted April 12 2003 - 09:04 PM

It reminds me of Army of Darkness: trapped in time, low on gas!

#6 of 22 OFFLINE   Magnus T

Magnus T

    Supporting Actor

  • 683 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 26 2003

Posted April 13 2003 - 03:06 AM

Looked like your typical summer blockbuster to me. Here today, gone tomorrow. Anyway, cool to see Richard Donner directing something other than a Lethal Weapon sequal.
There is no spoon...
but there is a fork with a cork!

#7 of 22 OFFLINE   WillG

WillG

    Producer

  • 5,219 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 2003

Posted April 13 2003 - 03:47 AM

Yes, but unfortunately, it's been awhile since Donner has made a good movie
STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!

#8 of 22 OFFLINE   todd stone

todd stone

    Screenwriter

  • 1,768 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 01 2000

Posted April 13 2003 - 05:01 AM

eh looks kinda bad to me..
Lo, there do I see my mother, and my sisters, and my brothers, Lo, there do I see the line of my people, back to the beginning, Lo, they do call to me, they bid me take my place among them, In the halls of Valhalla,where the brave may live...

#9 of 22 OFFLINE   Phil Florian

Phil Florian

    Screenwriter

  • 1,190 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 10 2001

Posted April 13 2003 - 06:27 AM

While Jurassic Park wasn't his first novel to be filmed, it was the first that really put his name on the map and in people's homes. I doubt there were many current moviegoers prior to JP could tell you about Andromeda Strain or Coma or even the Great Train Robbery or at least wouldn't be able to put Cricton's name to it. Post JP, he got all sorts of name recognition that allowed him to do some great stuff (ER, for example) and not-so-great stuff (to me, any of the novels that came after JP). I think his style devolved into pedesrian fair, at best. Believe me, Grissom is no better to me. Grissom and Crichton are, to me, just writing for the movie they know will inevitably be made. To me, that is. If people still enjoy it, groovy. It just doesn't work for me.


Phil


PS I love the Army of Darkness referrence...too funny.

#10 of 22 OFFLINE   Matt Stone

Matt Stone

    Lead Actor

  • 9,070 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 21 2000

Posted April 13 2003 - 07:34 AM

Looks pretty good to me. I'll give it a shot.
In Heaven, everything is fine.
[ 2006 Films | 2005 Films | 2004 Films | 2003 Films | YMDB Top 20 ]
[ Star Wars | Sideshow | HT | DVDs | LDs | AIM: Maulrat87 ]

#11 of 22 OFFLINE   Dan Rudolph

Dan Rudolph

    Producer

  • 4,042 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 30 2002

Posted April 13 2003 - 08:22 AM

The book is pretty good, so I'll give the movie a shot.
My Collection

#12 of 22 OFFLINE   Brenton

Brenton

    Screenwriter

  • 1,169 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 25 2002

Posted April 13 2003 - 10:40 AM

I think the movie looks really cool.

#13 of 22 OFFLINE   John Torrez

John Torrez

    Second Unit

  • 314 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 30 2000

Posted April 13 2003 - 08:24 PM

November? I thought it was supposed to open this summer.

#14 of 22 OFFLINE   Nigel McN

Nigel McN

    Supporting Actor

  • 848 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 23 2000

Posted April 14 2003 - 07:40 PM

er, fax machine?

#15 of 22 OFFLINE   Mikel_Cooperman

Mikel_Cooperman

    Producer

  • 4,184 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 16 2001

Posted April 15 2003 - 10:14 AM

I liked the book.
This is a tricky one to market I think. I hope they are successful.

#16 of 22 OFFLINE   Kenneth English

Kenneth English

    Second Unit

  • 422 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 29 1999

Posted April 16 2003 - 03:15 AM

Quote:
I may try it again before the movie because the premise is a hoot, but gosh he is a bad writer.

It's not that Crichton's a bad writer, he's just more interested in plot than character. He's like Agatha Christie -- he can come up with the most awesome, twisty, intricate stories but peoples them with cyphers. Oh, well. As far as I'm concerned this isn't a fatal flaw because he's a terrific storyteller one way or the other. I'm re-reading The Andromeda Strain right now and it's just as good as I remember.

Anyway, Timeline looks interesting. Even if it does star Paul Walker...

#17 of 22 OFFLINE   Richard Travale

Richard Travale

    Producer

  • 3,419 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 27 2001
  • Real Name:Rich Travale
  • LocationVancouver Island, Canada

Posted April 16 2003 - 07:23 AM

When I saw the trailer I thought it was a live action version of the 80s cartoon Dungeons & Dragons. That would have been RAD!
 "Cock your hat - angles are attitudes. "
- Frank Sinatra 

#18 of 22 OFFLINE   Phil Florian

Phil Florian

    Screenwriter

  • 1,190 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 10 2001

Posted April 16 2003 - 10:26 AM

Yah, Fax Machine. One prop I will give the book (and I will try it again as people giving props to the man piqued my interest again) is his concept of time travel. Not to give anything away, an engineer friend when discussing the concept of time travel posited a point that the book brings out (but I never finished so I didn't see where they went with it. The point was
since time travel involved sending a perfect copy into the past, the original doesn't leave. Because, if you have the technology to make a perfect replica of something (which is needed to disassemble then reassemble a person) why destroy the orignal. Like the Fax machine concept...a copy is sent, but what happens to the original? In the book, it is destroyed, if I recall. Is the "original" aware of this? In effect, a perfect clone of you is created in the past but the original doesn't end. Lots of metaphysical questions abound. Jeepers.
I was jazzed that I had heard the concept before and was intrigued enough almost to keep up with it. I guess what bothered me about it was how easy the travelers became embroiled in the local politics of the past. Like a poor man's version of "Connecticut Yankee" with dinosaurs. Okay, no dinosaurs, but still. Will give it a try again.


Phil

#19 of 22 OFFLINE   Ron-P

Ron-P

    Producer

  • 6,283 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 25 2000
  • Real Name:Ron

Posted April 17 2003 - 07:59 AM

Impressive....


Peace Out~Posted Image
You have all the weapons you need...Now fight!


#20 of 22 OFFLINE   Mikel_Cooperman

Mikel_Cooperman

    Producer

  • 4,184 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 16 2001

Posted April 17 2003 - 10:50 AM

I finally watched the preview and thought it looked pretty good but I am not understanding why they made the professor the person they went after into someones Dad now.

Paul Walkers delivery of some of the lines in the trailer were pretty bad. I think he keeps getting hired because of his hunky looks because it sure isnt his acting talents.