Rob_Pierce
Second Unit
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2002
- Messages
- 297
OK, so I've just finished the Forbidden Woods in the Wind Waker and I'm thinking, "I really like this game, but it's too much like OoT so far." I've read many other threads that say the same thing. But, when I think about it, changing the tried and true formula for Zelda is a sure fire way to kill everything that makes Zelda so much fun.
Nintendo took a huge risk in changing Metroid to a first-person view and it paid off big time. Mario Sunshine is basically Mario 64 all over again and was rated by Gamespot as the Most Disappointing GameCube title of 2002. What about Zelda? There's no major improvements, but I can't think of anything that I would change about the Zelda franchise.
So, for all of you nay sayers that claim WW is a bad (or not as good) game simply because it's too much like OoT, I would enjoy hearing your suggestions for future Zelda games. I'm all about "improving" games, but is the improvement worth the cost? Just curious; post your thoughts here.
Nintendo took a huge risk in changing Metroid to a first-person view and it paid off big time. Mario Sunshine is basically Mario 64 all over again and was rated by Gamespot as the Most Disappointing GameCube title of 2002. What about Zelda? There's no major improvements, but I can't think of anything that I would change about the Zelda franchise.
So, for all of you nay sayers that claim WW is a bad (or not as good) game simply because it's too much like OoT, I would enjoy hearing your suggestions for future Zelda games. I'm all about "improving" games, but is the improvement worth the cost? Just curious; post your thoughts here.