Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

DD sounds BETTER than MLP/PCM on DVD-A

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
8 replies to this topic

#1 of 9 OFFLINE   Philip Hamm

Philip Hamm

    Lead Actor

  • 6,885 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 23 1999

Posted April 01 2003 - 12:37 AM

That's right. I sat down last night and listened closely to selectsions from all my DVD-Audio discs and I've decided that the Dolby Digital compatability mode for multichannel sounds significantly better than the MLP/PCM track. It was a big surprise cause I always thought that PCM should be better. But my ears don't lie!!!!!

Time to sell the DVD-A player and use my SACD machine as a universal! Whoopie!
Philip Hamm
Moderator Emeritus

#2 of 9 OFFLINE   Dan Joy

Dan Joy

    Supporting Actor

  • 761 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 08 2001

Posted April 01 2003 - 12:48 AM

EHWWWW Nice April FOOOOls day thread!!!

If your serious,,,,, GO BACK TO BEDPosted Image

#3 of 9 OFFLINE   Ed St. Clair

Ed St. Clair


  • 3,320 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001

Posted April 01 2003 - 06:02 AM

What a Hamm!
Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!

#4 of 9 OFFLINE   Dean DeMass

Dean DeMass


  • 1,829 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted April 01 2003 - 06:55 AM

.......... loads gun........

#5 of 9 OFFLINE   LanceJ



  • 3,168 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2002

Posted April 01 2003 - 07:22 AM

Assuming you're serious Posted Image........

IMO, Dolby Digital sounds fine, but has a sort of soft high-end. It also lacks the fine details that even CD has.

While I don't have a center or sub yet, I hooked up all my Pioneer's multichannel outputs anyway to my Technics SA-DA8 receiver, so I can least hear the rear channels for "playing around" purposes. I first put on my Linkin Park dvd-audio. I always wanted to hear the stereo track in it's 44.1Khz/24bit PCM form, rather than DD.

The PCM definitely sounded better to me. Details quite a bit clearer & more "space" around the instruments, like a subtle fogginess was taken away. And on the PCM surround track, the same effect. A more "tinkly" sound was heard (sorry, not good with these kinds of adjectives!).

Same with the "Fragile" & "What's New" dvd-audios. Their DTS tracks were closer in quality to the MLP tracks (very close actually) but DTS has a slight high-frequency graininess that DD and MLP don't have; it's sounds very much like a CD in fact.

But to me, MLP has that "space", detail AND lack of graininess all in one package.


#6 of 9 OFFLINE   Camp



  • 2,303 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 03 1999

Posted April 01 2003 - 07:34 AM

I prefer to rip it to a 96kbps mono .mp3 and listen on the speaker built-in to my laptop.

#7 of 9 OFFLINE   Ken_McAlinden



  • 6,093 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 20 2001
  • Real Name:Kenneth McAlinden
  • LocationLivonia, MI USA

Posted April 01 2003 - 07:39 AM

Finally someone else who is not afraid to say this. I wish they would do more DD tracks at 96kbps, though. It completely blows 448kbps out of the water.

Ken McAlinden
Livonia, MI USA

#8 of 9 OFFLINE   LanceJ



  • 3,168 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2002

Posted April 01 2003 - 08:02 AM

Oops, forgot the date :b


#9 of 9 OFFLINE   KeithH


    Lead Actor

  • 9,427 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 28 2000

Posted April 01 2003 - 11:53 AM

I actually prefer to the play DTS tracks on a system without a DTS decoder. The high-pitched noise sounds great! Posted Image
Main Stereo and HT Systems ;
Second Stereo System ;
Equipment List ; DVDs, SACDs, and more ;
Planned Upgrades and Additions "You know, the tomato never took off as a handfruit."- George Costanza