Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Marantz 4300 or 5300? What do you think?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 of 3 OFFLINE   David Preston

David Preston

    Supporting Actor



  • 698 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 23 2003

Posted March 29 2003 - 06:15 PM

I just purchased the marantz 4300 for $375.00. I could have got the 5300 for $529.00. Did I do the right thing I really don't need the front inputs the 5300 offers and I beleive the only other difference is the 10 watts per channel. I plan on powering the energy take 5.2 in the future but now I have cerwin-vega 12" floorstanding speakers up front and a cv 12" sub and cv rears. It sounds great. What do you think about the marantz? Thanks David

#2 of 3 OFFLINE   David Preston

David Preston

    Supporting Actor



  • 698 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 23 2003

Posted April 08 2003 - 09:36 PM

btt

#3 of 3 OFFLINE   ChrisAG

ChrisAG

    Supporting Actor



  • 503 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 26 2001

Posted April 09 2003 - 02:11 AM

The 5300 is also better for video switching if you have all S-video components. The amp is beefier for driving big speakers, but your Energy system should be fine with the 4300. If I had oodles of cash I would have gotten the 8200, but at the time I could only afford the 6200. Even so, I was upgrading from a Yamaha RX-V390 so the 6200 was worlds better. The question you have to ask is, are you satisfied with the 4300, and if not, can you afford the 5300? Keep in mind you could always consider the 4300 to be a "temporary" situation. After a year, sell it (or give it to a favorite relative) and upgrade to the next generation 5x00.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users