Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

B&K 507 vs Ref 50

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 of 5 OFFLINE   Steve Simm

Steve Simm

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 103 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 26 2000

Posted March 29 2003 - 01:12 AM

Is there anything the Ref 50 does that the 507 does not? I am trying to decide between these 2 pieces and from the research I have done I can find no functional/performance differences between the 2 but then again I don't dig as deep into some of the more obscure functions as some of you do. I was torn between going with separates or flagship receiver and have decided for my needs it just doesn't matter. Price becomes the deciding factor. But if the Ref 50 offers a feature the 507 doesn't have then I will evaluate the value of that feature. I tend to keep my equipment at least 4-5 years so I do want the latest and greatest when I upgrade. I am not concerned with being able to upgrade just a processor later on and keeping the amp.

#2 of 5 OFFLINE   Jerry Klawiter

Jerry Klawiter


  • 1,420 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 03 2000

Posted March 29 2003 - 01:43 AM

Only the balanced in/outputs on the Ref50. They are the same from that point.

#3 of 5 OFFLINE   Steve Simm

Steve Simm

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 103 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 26 2000

Posted March 29 2003 - 04:10 AM

Jerry, thanks for the response. It looks like the 507 is the way to go. I having been using a DSP-A1 for the last 4 years and am having a hard time making a purchase as the A1 does almost everything I need it to and has been a rock solid performer. I have really been giving consideration to the RX-Z1 but having only 1 rear channel output instead of 2 seems a little short sighted (I know there is only 6.1 at this time), the lack of bass adjustment options, and the remote have lessend my enthusiasm for it and I have been a loyal Yamaha buyer for the last 11 years.

#4 of 5 OFFLINE   Chip E

Chip E


  • 1,166 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 25 2000

Posted March 29 2003 - 01:59 PM

If you get the Ref50 plus an amp or, the 507 receiver, you'll get the best remote go'n... an MX-700. GREAT remote. Posted Image
- Chip


#5 of 5 OFFLINE   MatthewJ S

MatthewJ S

    Supporting Actor

  • 585 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 27 2001

Posted March 29 2003 - 11:31 PM

Actually ,I have used the 307 and now the 507 as a pre-amp with outboard amps because I find that it is easier and a better return on investment to sell a rcvr (larger pool of buyers) than it is to sell a pre-amp..... p.s...Chip, did you know that the 700 can learn on it's own, without being hooked to the computer? hidden feature accessable the same way the mx500 could!
that receiver sounds great demo'd through my computer speakers!

I bought the best ones, my buddy would never steer me wrong .He's not trying to make a commission off me and Cambridge Sound's factory direct pricing means that I got a great deal!

It must be a good deal all the people on the net...

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users