-

Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Screen removal affecting geometry?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
9 replies to this topic

#1 of 10 Casey T

Casey T

    Auditioning

  • 13 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 22 2003

Posted March 21 2003 - 03:33 AM

Hi all.

This is my first post here, so any help is very appreciated Posted Image

I just took the protective screen off of my Toshiba 42HDX82 to see how it would look (I had already had it re stacked). First impressions: the picture seemed brighter and (maybe this is just my perception) the viewing angle seemed to improve a bit.

However...

The geometry of the set is way off. I have a very noticeable pincushion effect (bowing inwards). I assumed that some convergence would have to readjusted, but the harsh pincushion is a bit of a surprise. Is this also the result of the focus plane changing or could this be from screen sag? I sued the oft-documented magazine method, and my screen seemed pretty tight, but I'm not sure if a little difference here could be the culprit.

Again, any input is appreciated. Thanks!

Casey
Casey

"...the one who gets away with it."

#2 of 10 Jim Doolittle

Jim Doolittle

    Extra

  • 20 posts
  • Join Date: May 01 1999

Posted March 23 2003 - 12:34 AM

Are you sure you put the fresnel lens back in to the set with the proper orientation?
Jim Doolittle

Member ISF since 1994. ISF employee since 1996. Joe Kane Productions employee since 1996. Providing calibration and alignment services. Equipped with Philips PM5639 color analyzer, TVS Pro optical comparator, Sencore 5000, Sencore VP300, and 10 years experience.
jim@jimdoo.com
781-...

#3 of 10 Casey T

Casey T

    Auditioning

  • 13 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 22 2003

Posted March 23 2003 - 03:41 AM

Didn't tocuh the fresnel or lenticular screen, actually (the set was restacked for me at the shop). When I have the protective screen on, everything's perfect, geometry and convergence-wise (it's at the back of the stack). It's only when the protective screen is removed completel that there's a problem.

Thanks.
Casey

"...the one who gets away with it."

#4 of 10 Jason Spencer

Jason Spencer

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 105 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 05 2002

Posted March 23 2003 - 05:08 AM

I also tried a restack with similar results. In my case I definatly had screen sag (it was very noticable) and the picture was crazy wavy. I just put the screen back in the front. I'm thinking of a restack instead. It just seemed too flimsy with just the lent/fres screens without the "mirror". How did you like the restack picture? Was the only benifit the elimation of the "mirror" effect? Or did the quality improve any?
-Jay

#5 of 10 Casey T

Casey T

    Auditioning

  • 13 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 22 2003

Posted March 23 2003 - 06:25 AM

I founf that the viewing angle was somewhat improved, and that the birghtness was definitely better.

I at first thought I had sag - the lent and fresnel didn't seem perfectly sung. But when I relaced the mirror screen, i found that they still weren't perfectly snug, but all my picture problems disappeared.

I've been told a 56 pt convergence may solve this.Anyo pinions on that?

Thanks.
Casey

"...the one who gets away with it."

#6 of 10 Jason Spencer

Jason Spencer

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 105 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 05 2002

Posted March 23 2003 - 10:44 AM

Was the improvement when the screen was removed, or after the restack? I wanted to know how it looked with a restack. I'm either going to do a restack or just replace it with a non-reflective screen.

In my case after removing the screen it was too wavy to use convergence to fix it, but I guess with an only slightly bent stack the convergence/geometry adjustment could "correct" it. I'd rather have a flat screen though, so to me any bowing is unacceptable, I don't want to just "cover up" the problem...
-Jay

#7 of 10 Gregg Loewen

Gregg Loewen

    Producer

  • 6,317 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 09 1999
  • Real Name:Gregg Loewen
  • LocationNew England

Posted March 23 2003 - 01:53 PM

Hi guys!

This is the side effect of removing the glare screen from the stack. The bezel is quite flexible and will cause the screen to concave inwards when being tightened down.

The above should not be a problem if you do geometry and then covergence. You will still notice the concave when viewing from the sides but not from the "major" viewing area.

Regards

Gregg

The Sonodome - circa 2001
The Newest Sonotube - circa 2001
Gregg's DVDs updated...sometimes
Lion Audio Video Consultants usually current


#8 of 10 Jan Strnad

Jan Strnad

    Screenwriter

  • 1,004 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 1999

Posted March 24 2003 - 03:34 AM

I'd get an acrylic non-reflective screen from a plastics store. Have them cut it to size. You'll get a protective screen, which is a good thing, but cut down the glare dramatically, and no sag.

Jan
Jan Strnad

aka J. Knight,
author of Risen and Boo.

#9 of 10 JohnnyG

JohnnyG

    Screenwriter

  • 1,523 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 18 2000

Posted March 24 2003 - 08:00 AM

It just wasn't good enough for you the way it was, eh?! Posted Image

#10 of 10 Casey T

Casey T

    Auditioning

  • 13 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 22 2003

Posted March 27 2003 - 03:11 AM

Well, I find the distortion form the screen removal actually kind of annoying, so it looks like I'm going to place it back from where it came Posted Image

The main reason I had removed the screen was because of two wavy horizontal 'smudge" lines at the top and bottom of the screen. I checked the protective screen and it seemed clean, so i'm not quite sure what's causing this.

If anyone has any information on what (if anything) can be done about this, I'd be most appreciative.

Thanks!
Casey

"...the one who gets away with it."