1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Wow, I've Discovered Stereo

Discussion in 'AV Receivers' started by JeromeS, Jul 8, 2003.

  1. JeromeS

    JeromeS Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2001
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    Okay, it hasn't been like I've been living under a rock for all these years. However after years of listening to music through portables, Walkmans and not so good receivers, recent upgrades to the 2 channel reproduction on my stereo/HT system I'm just hearing how great stereo can be. There is so much in those CDs and especially records(Can we say RCA) that I didn't know about. Before I've read about imaging and soundstage and thought what were they talking about, now I know. With my old stuff, there was the left/right separation of course but it was like 'Yes that saxophone is coming from somewhere on the right near the drums'. Now it's like 'The saxophone is coming from that spot right there and the drums are behind him to the left.'

    I'm not saying every piece of music I own is like that since a lot of this depends on the mastering of the source material. With multi-channel music it's suppose to give you the feel of being surrounded but with stereo it already does that. Plus for classical music, to be able to distinguish different acoustics for the venue where the recording was done was something totally unexpected. Now that was cool. [​IMG]

    Don't get me wrong, I still love movies but my music collection outnumbers my DVD collection by a ratio of 6:1 and so I thought I should upgrade that part of my system instead of getting another HT component. I wonder how many here would benefit from upgrading their 2 channel playback instead of getting the latest receiver/processor with 6.1, 7.1 or surround speakers.
     
  2. Scott_N

    Scott_N Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Messages:
    425
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's why I have seperate HT and 2-channel systems. Welcome to the audiophile world.
     
  3. MarkMaximus

    MarkMaximus Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    0
    What upgrades did you do out of curiosity? Where did you come from/where did you go?
     
  4. Mark Hedges

    Mark Hedges Second Unit

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    442
    Likes Received:
    0
    I recently underwent a similar revelation. In fact, I almost regret going with a multichannel system now. I use it probably 75% of the time for 2 channel music. Maybe I should have just gotten a nice stereo integrated amp instead of my 4ES!

    Eventually I plan on having seperate systems but for now it has to be one or the other.

    My music collection vastly outnumbers my DVD collection and probably always will. Even movies I really like such as LOTR don't get played as often as my favorite CDs.
     
  5. JeromeS

    JeromeS Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2001
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  6. Jack Briggs

    Jack Briggs Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 1999
    Messages:
    16,740
    Likes Received:
    129
    Just a little fine point: "Stereo" means more than one channel. So the word "stereo," technically, can apply to a full-blown HT surround system as much as to a two-channel music (and/or movie) system. FYI.

    Two-channel music systems can be terrific.
     
  7. Angelo.M

    Angelo.M Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    4,007
    Likes Received:
    0
    As far as I know, the only reason that 2-channel (as opposed to more than 2-channels) became a 'standard' for music playback (including both mono and stereo music playback) was that a vinyl record groove is 2-sided.

    Jack is correct: 'stereo' and '2-channel' are not synonyms.

    Let me know if I'm way off... [​IMG]
     
  8. Jason.Soko

    Jason.Soko Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2003
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    0
    stereo

    adj : (electronics) designating sound transmission from two sources through two channels
     
  9. Martin Rendall

    Martin Rendall Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2000
    Messages:
    1,047
    Likes Received:
    0
    Isn't the Foreplay just a wonderful pre? As far as a tube change, can I suggest that you look into NOS Mullard Gov't CV4003's? I got a pair, and liked them so much, I acquired another spare pair for when I'll need to replace them 10 years from now. [​IMG]

    I wasn't clear: are you running the FP into the Yammie Pre in's? If so, you might consider implementing an HT bypass in the FP, so that you can keep the Yammie out of 2 channel entirely. Just a thought.

    Martin.
     
  10. Frank_S

    Frank_S Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 1999
    Messages:
    566
    Likes Received:
    0
    Congrats Jerome, Great to hear of your success in achieving quality sound. I would recommend going with a tube amp setup and using your Yamaha strictly for HT. This would bring your 2 channel experience to the next level. [​IMG]

    A couple of questions.
    How efficient are your speakers?
    Do they go below 4 ohms?
    What range of music do you listen to?
    A low power tube amp may be all you need.
     
  11. JeromeS

    JeromeS Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2001
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    Martin,

    Yes I was looking at the Mullard CV4003 for the next set of tubes. Telefunken is a little expensive in comparison to the Mullards from what I can see. As for the connection it's the Yamaha's preouts going into the FP input with the FP outs going into the Outlaw. Use the FP with unity gain for HT listening.
     
  12. JeromeS

    JeromeS Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2001
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    Frank,

    How efficient are your speakers? I couldn't tell you to save my life. According to PSB's web site the sensitivity is 92db but that isn't the same as efficiency I think.

    Do they go below 4 ohms? Nope. 4 ohms is minimum.

    What range of music do you listen to? Wide range from classical, jazz, pop/Top 40, Rock/Heavy Metal.

    I was looking at tube amps but still have to figure out the differences between SET and push-pull. I don't know if tubes would have enough for HT though or does it? [​IMG] Plus I'm out of space as far as separate rooms for HT and 2 channel so right now I have to keep both integrated.
     
  13. JamesHl

    JamesHl Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Messages:
    813
    Likes Received:
    0
    adj : (electronics) designating sound transmission from two sources through two channels [syn: stereophonic, two-channel] n 1: two microphones feed two or more loudspeakers to give a three-dimensional effect to the sound

    The root word means creating a 3d image, not the number two. So in some ways, it would apply even more accurately to a multichannel system, as they are more able to accurately create the illusion of 3 dimensions.
     
  14. Craig_Kg

    Craig_Kg Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2002
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  15. Adil M

    Adil M Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2001
    Messages:
    922
    Likes Received:
    0
    Looks like someones been reading their Stereophile today...
     
  16. Mark Dickerson

    Mark Dickerson Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    May 10, 2003
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jack:

    Actually, "stereo" is from a greek word and it means "solid" as in providing a solid image of the sound when played back opposed to the old monophonic sound which made no attempt to sound realistic. Now some 50 years after it was invented, we usually think of stereo as meaning two channel, but when you realize the root of the word, you are correct that any format of more than one channels which attempts to convey a solid image of the sound would be stereo. After listening to a couple of SACDs yesterday (Police and Eagles), I can attest to how wonderful (and solid) their image is.

    Angelo:

    You are just a bit off. Vinyl records (actually, they were made of bakelite before that) had two side to their grooves before stereo was ever conceived. The technological breakthrough that created stereo sound was the ability to provide a different ridge on either side of the groove that created the ability to offer two channels, i.e., stereo sound. So in a sense you are right that two channel sound became a standard in the very late fifties, early sixties as two channels were all they could do. Ahh, but you have forgotten "quadraphonic sound" which came out about 1969, but degenerated into a format war (a la Beta v. VHS) and it never got very far with consumers because the manufacturers fought over whether the standard should be "matrix quad" or "discrete quad." Nevertheless, they were able to get all four channels onto a vinyl record but they were both proprietary formats and did not inter-change. Today, when I hear some SACD or DVD-Audio disks, it reminds me a lot of the old quad sound, which even then was pretty comparable to the new stuff.
     
  17. Angelo.M

    Angelo.M Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    4,007
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  18. Frank_S

    Frank_S Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 1999
    Messages:
    566
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  19. Mark Hedges

    Mark Hedges Second Unit

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    442
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  20. Craig_Kg

    Craig_Kg Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2002
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, having the CD player directly connected to the 2ch system would be much better - the 2nd room stuff is more for background listening. Just use your DVD player in your HT room for CDs.
     

Share This Page