1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Widest ever? ever ever?

Discussion in 'Movies' started by John S, Jul 18, 2005.

  1. John S

    John S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,460
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pulled out my LD of Ben Hur over the weekend which I had not watched in forever plus a day.


    Taken back by the size of the screen I was getting, I looked on the box.. 2.76:1 preserved in OAR....

    Wowsers... I found I really liked the field of view and the director really seem to use every bit of it often.


    So any others in this ratio? Any others any wider?


    Just curious.
     
  2. TommyT

    TommyT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2003
    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Tom
    Looks like that might be the only one. I checked BH's tech specs in the IMDB & clicked on the entry for 2.76 & it was the only one listed.

    Funny thing is that BH seems to have 2 other ratios: 2.20 & 2.35. Tell you what, take a look here.
     
  3. SteveJKo

    SteveJKo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2005
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    19
    John,

    Only two films that I'm aware of were filmed in the process named MGM Camera 65, and they were Ben-Hur and Raintree County.

    Now this same process was also known as Ultra Panavision 70, and the following films were shot with it:
    Mutiny On The Bounty(1962)
    It's A Mad Mad Mad Mad World(1963)
    The Fall Of The Roman Empire(1964)
    Battle Of The Bulge(1965)
    The Greatest Story Ever Told(1965)
    Khartoum(1966)

    Some sources claim The Big Fishermanfrom 1959 is also anamorphic 70mm, but others say no, that it was actually Super Panavision 70 just like West Side Story and Lawrence Of Arabia.

    I totally agree with your comment about the cinematography of Ben-Hur, and I wish the wide frame was used as creatively today.
     
  4. Holadem

    Holadem Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2000
    Messages:
    8,972
    Likes Received:
    0
    I did the same over the weekend with the DVD.

    I love my front projector [​IMG]

    --
    H
     
  5. Jeff Gatie

    Jeff Gatie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    6,531
    Likes Received:
    15
    Wider than even Ben Hur (2.76:1) is the Cinerama process (THIS IS CINERAMA (1952), SEVEN WONDERS OF THE WORLD (1956), SOUTH SEAS ADVENTURE (1958)) which were 2.77:1.

    But the widest scope film ever was Abel Gance's Napoleon (1927) which used 3 cameras to film and 3 projectors to display, achieving a 3.66:1 aspect ratio. This process, called "Polyvision", was only used for the battle scenes. The film reverted to 1 projector 1.33:1 for non-battle sequences.
     
  6. John S

    John S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,460
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks.. I will have to seek out this other material.


    Really neat when the director actually uses the real estate.

    1927 Napoleon.. Sounds like it would be a great score if ever released. I wouldn't doubt it was released LD at some point.


    I will have to look at my DVD of Mad Mad Mad World. I had not remembered it seeming extra wide, but that doesn't mean it isn't as I didn't remember this one being so wide either.

    Shoot every one of those on the Ultra Panavision 70 list, are titles I want to own. I actually think I have one or two of those as well.
     
  7. george kaplan

    george kaplan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2001
    Messages:
    13,064
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm pretty sure It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World is as wide, or nearly so, as Ben-Hur. But it may not be that way on the dvd, which is cut, and if I'm recalling correctly, misframed.
     
  8. Paul Linfesty

    Paul Linfesty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2001
    Messages:
    216
    Likes Received:
    0


    Not in this case. While an Ultra-Panavision print would be correctly presented at 2.76, and the LD (as well as a VHS and DVD version) is also 2.76, a UP70 source was not used for the transfer. They actually used 35mm elements and cropped the top and bottom to "re-ceate" the 2.76 OAR, so the image is incorrect.

    This is supposedly being correcetd for the upcoming DVD edition, which has gone back to 65mm elements.

    AFAIK, Greatest Story Ever Told is correct on the DVD, having used 65mm elements. And IAMMMMW was recently re-released to theatres in the original UP70 ratio.
     
  9. Shawn_KE

    Shawn_KE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Good The Bad and the Ugly is also pretty damn wide.
     
  10. John S

    John S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,460
    Likes Received:
    0
    So much information.
    Thanks everybody!


    Ever notice that when you watch a ton of widescreen material in a row, when you come across 4:3 (1.33:1) it just looks funny?


    Thanks again for the lesson in film aspect ratio history.
     

Share This Page