DaViD Boulet
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 1999
- Messages
- 8,826
Joey,
Get a larger rear-projection display (16x9 WS of course) for the same or close price.
DO NOT GET THAT 4x3 DIRECT-VIEW.
Yes...it's got a great picture. But you also want a *big* picture with your WS movies and things have come a long way...the RP sets out there now are light-years ahead of what you had before and IMO most of them produce a BETTER picture than their direct-view counterparts.
Also, some of the digital RP sets like Sony's LCD 16x9 HD and Samsung's DLP don't have any CRT guns to "align" and look much more detailed/sharp to the eye than comparable CRT sets.
I know Sony was having a big discount of some of the LCD-based HD sets a while back. That might be something to consider too and though Samsung's build quality has been a hot-topic, if you get a decent warranty that DLP puts out a stunning picture for a very cheap price!!
BTW, take seriously comments to the effect of "make your WS movies bigger than your 4x3 TV". It really is cheezy (sorry folks, but it is) when you switch from cable TV to LOTR on DVD and you image shrinks. What gives? Why get a TV that pays homage to your 4x3 cable programming but gives 2nd seat to your WS DVD movies? What's more important?
The fact that there's "lots of 4x3 content" is irrelvent. Do I want to watch all that (low image quality) 4x3 cable content blown-up bigger than my high-qualty DVD movies? If you set your couch to get a decent picture with your 4x3 programing on a 4x3 set then you're getting an image that's too small when you switch to a WS movie. If you set up your seating for the WS movie then your cable looks aweful because it's too big.
A 16x9-shaped set does the best with all image content IMHO.
-dave
Get a larger rear-projection display (16x9 WS of course) for the same or close price.
DO NOT GET THAT 4x3 DIRECT-VIEW.
Yes...it's got a great picture. But you also want a *big* picture with your WS movies and things have come a long way...the RP sets out there now are light-years ahead of what you had before and IMO most of them produce a BETTER picture than their direct-view counterparts.
Also, some of the digital RP sets like Sony's LCD 16x9 HD and Samsung's DLP don't have any CRT guns to "align" and look much more detailed/sharp to the eye than comparable CRT sets.
I know Sony was having a big discount of some of the LCD-based HD sets a while back. That might be something to consider too and though Samsung's build quality has been a hot-topic, if you get a decent warranty that DLP puts out a stunning picture for a very cheap price!!
BTW, take seriously comments to the effect of "make your WS movies bigger than your 4x3 TV". It really is cheezy (sorry folks, but it is) when you switch from cable TV to LOTR on DVD and you image shrinks. What gives? Why get a TV that pays homage to your 4x3 cable programming but gives 2nd seat to your WS DVD movies? What's more important?
The fact that there's "lots of 4x3 content" is irrelvent. Do I want to watch all that (low image quality) 4x3 cable content blown-up bigger than my high-qualty DVD movies? If you set your couch to get a decent picture with your 4x3 programing on a 4x3 set then you're getting an image that's too small when you switch to a WS movie. If you set up your seating for the WS movie then your cable looks aweful because it's too big.
A 16x9-shaped set does the best with all image content IMHO.
-dave