1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Which 5.1 Music Format Do You Prefer?

Discussion in 'Playback Devices' started by Cliff Olson, Apr 22, 2003.

  1. Cliff Olson

    Cliff Olson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2002
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm new to multi-channel audio, and with the 2+ formats available, DVD-A, SACD, and DTS (DVD-A that uses the digital out!), it is quite overwhelming. I don't have multi channel inputs on my Lexicon, so I can only play SACDs in 2-channel format (I have Sony's 999ES). I am pleased with SACD stereo, but I can't help but wonder how much better multi-channel SACDs would sound.
    I really like the idea that DTS uses the digital out on CD/DVD players, but I have no idea if their sound is as good as SACDs or regular DVD-As in multi-channel. I just bought Vivaldi's Four Seasons on DVD-A (DTS), but I'm not very impressed (and I'm a HUGE fan of DTS Movie Soundtracks!). Are there great sounding DTS CDs out there?
    I'm wondering what format you guys (and gals) like the best. Thanks!
     
  2. Philip Hamm

    Philip Hamm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 1999
    Messages:
    6,888
    Likes Received:
    2
     
  3. Dan Joy

    Dan Joy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2001
    Messages:
    761
    Likes Received:
    0
    To me the source recording and how the sound people use it is more important than the actual DVD-Audio, DTS, or SACD formats. DTS sounded great(and some still do) until I heard DVD-Audio and SACD. As a caveat, there are plenty of poor sounding material in all three formats. Luckily I can have all three and buy what I want.

    P.S. IBTFW (in before the format war)[​IMG]
     
  4. Jerome Grate

    Jerome Grate Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 1999
    Messages:
    2,937
    Likes Received:
    1
    There are some great, multi channel audio out there. I don't have DVD-A or SACD yet, but listening to some DTS CDs and some DVDs with multi channel music on them is really great. I find Forever Yours by Marvin Gaye to be a good selection. I would love to see some Earth Wind & Fire on Multi Channel audio/DVD. The best thing that you have right now is that Lexicon. You know (of course) that Logic 7 does an excellent job with stereo and your surrounds.

    I have the Harman Kardon 500 and my CDs really sound impressive. You can use the PCM of you DVD player and Logic 7 M will do the trick. Now call me weird but I have a preference of using the analog portion of the receiver. I have the DVD player going through the JVC 7600 and then the 7600 going through the t.v. to take advantage of the t.v.'s stereo wide enhancement. I find that there is more seperation not just on the fronts but in the rear as well. Some CDs do so well on this, it really appears to be multi channel audio. Clarity is there, the sound (to me) sound natural to the extent of placing let say back up singers in the rear and some instruments as well. You're placed in the middle of the band sometimes depending on what cd you are listening to.
     
  5. Rich Malloy

    Rich Malloy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    3,999
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  6. John Kotches

    John Kotches Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2000
    Messages:
    2,636
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rich,

    Respectfully, I disagree with what you say.

     
  7. Mark All

    Mark All Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2002
    Messages:
    256
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was an early adopter of DVD-A when I got a Toshiba SD-9200 and listened to the few available DVD-As for several months before getting an SACD player. I initially thought the multi-channel DVD-A format superior to the multi-channel SACD format because Fleetwood Mac's "Rumours" sounded so much better to me than any multi-channel SACD mix I bought. Now I've listened to more source material though, I can't say one multi-channel format (SACD vs DVD-A) is superior to another. "Dark Side of the Moon" finally changed my mind about multi-channel SACD audio being equal to the two-channel experience. The mix on this release is astonishingly good. However, all things considered, I'd agree with Rich and Jerome that there is such a wide range of great to mediocre multi-channel releases available that it doesn't make sense to me to get rid of a good two-channel music system just to get access to multi-channel DVD-A or SACD. Another thing I would take into consideration if starting over again would be whether I already had four full-range speakers for the four corners of my listening room. I have tried satellite speakers for the back in place of full-range speakers and the multi-channel experience paled in comparison to having large speakers all around.
     
  8. Nick V

    Nick V Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2002
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have a DVD-Audio player, and have heard SACD quite extensively while demoing amps and speakers to buy.

    I can say I like them both equally, and I HATE them both equally. I guess they're still young, but COME ON!! start releasing some discs at the same time that they're released on CD. I'm not a big classical music fan, so I bought a DVD-A player, but it's frustrating to know how much better these formats are than CD, yet still have to buy CD's if you want something that was recently released.

    ARGH!!
     
  9. Rich Malloy

    Rich Malloy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    3,999
    Likes Received:
    0
    John, I certainly agree with most of what you say, but I was gauging my response to Cliff... not the "average consumer", for whom Lexicon gear is probably a bit out-of-range. The folks you speak to are probably adding audio gear (SACD or DVD-A players) to a home theater system, whereas it appears that Cliff is considering the addition of multichannel capabilities to a fairly high-end two-channel setup.

    Since his Lexicon won't accept 6 channels, he'll have to "upgrade" this unit in addition to adding a new player. So long as this really is an upgrade, he'll surely be happy with multichannel capabilities. But if the budget is limited and he'll have to take a step back in quality to add those additional channels, then I think he's setting himself up for a disappointment.

    Further, I don't know what Cliff's currently using for CDs (or LPs), but if he's got super high-end stuff, then that's gonna play into this, as well. If he's using Mark Levinson or Weiss Medea DACs, then he's not going to perceive much of an upgrade by dropping a cheap DVD-A or SACD player into his system.

    But assuming he's not giving up the Lexicon for a much cheaper multichannel capable unit, and assuming he's not expecting an under-$300 SACD or DVD-A player to outperform a topnotch CD playback system (much less a top-notch 'table), and he's interested in the still relatively paltry number of good multichannel discs on the market, then I'd think he'd get much enjoyment from going multichannel.
     
  10. Michael St. Clair

    Michael St. Clair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    6,009
    Likes Received:
    0
    For surround, I prefer DVD-A because I like to be able to take the surround mixes to my friends' houses and play them there. I know tons of people with multichannel DVD-V, which DVD-A is backwards compatible with. None of my friends have taken the multichannel SACD plunge.
     
  11. anthony_b

    anthony_b Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2000
    Messages:
    1,078
    Likes Received:
    3
    As an early adapter of both formats , It's been so hard to purchase music to my particular taste in either format. I just hope music labels start putting out more diverse music.
     
  12. Lewis Besze

    Lewis Besze Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 1999
    Messages:
    3,134
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  13. LanceJ

    LanceJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,168
    Likes Received:
    0
    In my opinion, multichannel music is a large change from stereo. And in my case, "change" means "improvement". It's not like I hate stereo now; I just like multichannel music better.

    Dvd-audio's hi-res stereo compared to the regular-res version (CD) is an improvement, but I have to be in my "analytical mode" to notice the differences. Otherwise those differences--to me--are not the underwear staining experiences some people report. [​IMG]

    LJ
     
  14. Jerome Grate

    Jerome Grate Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 1999
    Messages:
    2,937
    Likes Received:
    1

    I can agree with that, the difference between my fronts and surrounds is one woofer per speaker. The imaging behind me is quite impressive. (Platinum Audio), the best way you can see if your surrounds are as good as your fronts is to either select 5 channel stereo or even in 5.1 applications, disconnect the fronts and stand in between them. You'd be surprised whats back there.
     
  15. Rich Malloy

    Rich Malloy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    3,999
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  16. Cliff Olson

    Cliff Olson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2002
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rich, it's clear to me. I will definately not "trade down" to get multi-channel inputs. Thanks to everyone for their input You've been very helpful [​IMG]
     
  17. LanceJ

    LanceJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,168
    Likes Received:
    0
    Excuse my multichannel "cheerleading" attitude, but mulitchannel sound to me is definitely NOT just icing on the hi-res cake.

    Multichannel is basically a whole other cake.

    If I were given the choice between: a stereo system made up of Boston Acoustics' $2,700/pair VR-M90's (their best speakers) powered by separates from Rotel OR a 5.1 system made up of five $400/pair Boston CR85's + a 10" sub powered by a $500 Yamaha receiver.......I would pick the "cheap" system immediately. Even if these were music-only systems.

    For me, music presented from all around me is more interesting, involving and sometimes just plain more fun than flat stereo can provide.

    LJ
     
  18. Lewis Besze

    Lewis Besze Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 1999
    Messages:
    3,134
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  19. LanceJ

    LanceJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,168
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think a lot of people "don't like" multichannel music because they have priced themselves right out of it.

    Ever notice that 95% of the HiRes Highway members (Audioasylum's sacd haven) constantly put down surround music? Ever checked out their systems? Usually mega-buck stereo rigs tweaked all to hell. I'll bet adding three more channels of amplification, speakers & a subwoofer scares the dog doo out of them.

    Like I've said before I stopped listening to audiophiles years ago, and afterwards audio and listening to music became fun again.

    LJ
     
  20. anthony_b

    anthony_b Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2000
    Messages:
    1,078
    Likes Received:
    3
    I agree with LanceJ 100%.
    [​IMG] Well put LanceJ.
     

Share This Page