1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

"Where the Truth Lies" edited for DVD...Why?

Discussion in 'DVD' started by Frank@N, May 15, 2006.

  1. Frank@N

    Frank@N Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    0
    I do a lot of blind-buys at lower price points and today's catch included Where the Truth Lies (2005).

    The version I got was the "DVD Edition", which I thought was the dumbest banner I ever saw on top of a DVD case.

    Then I get home and check web reviews, most of which seem to be of the "Unrated Theatrical Edition" DVD.

    What the heck?

    So the film was released in theaters unrated because the director didn't make enough cuts and then Sony decides to created an R-rated version for DVD?

    I didn't put it on yet, but it probably has one of those disclaimers that 'the film has been altered for content'.

    If the theatrical version was unrated, there shouldn't be any R-rated DVDs.
     
  2. Stephen_J_H

    Stephen_J_H All Things Film Junkie
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,557
    Likes Received:
    399
    Location:
    North of the 49th
    Real Name:
    Stephen J. Hill
    Where did you buy it? I'd advise getting your hands on the Canadian DVD, which is only available unrated.
     
  3. Frank@N

    Frank@N Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    0
    I got a used copy at Gamestop for a nice price.

    The 'Unrated Theatrical Edition' is also appears to be R1.

    I'm just tee'd that Sony would created an R-rated version for DVD.

    In the past all you had to do was make sure you got the WS version, now you have to worry about getting a version that's been edited down from the one in theaters.
     
  4. JeremyErwin

    JeremyErwin Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2001
    Messages:
    3,219
    Likes Received:
    0
    The MPAA gave it a NC-17.

    source
     
  5. Rob W

    Rob W Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    May 23, 1999
    Messages:
    535
    Likes Received:
    100
    Location:
    Toronto
    Real Name:
    Robert
    They make 'em because Wal-Mart & Blockbuster won't stock unrated movies.
     
  6. RyanAn

    RyanAn Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2004
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    0

    I've bought Wolf Creek, Hostel, many more Unrated DVDs at Wal-Mart.

    I'll be on the look out for the NC-17 version, it never came to my theatre in it's initial run, but at least we have the DVD.

    Ryan
     
  7. Kevin Sharp

    Kevin Sharp Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1998
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    1

    Actually, the WILL carry "unrated" movies, but will NOT carry NC-17. WTTL got an NC-17 rating for theatrical distribution.

    The other unrated titles (e.g., Wolf Creek) came out in theaters rated R, which then lets the studio release an "unrated" version, which in turn Blockbuster & Wal-Mart will carry.

    The big joke is that most of the "unrated" cuts of horror movies would've been NC-17 in theaters, but because they don't technically have that stigma the stores will carry them.
     
  8. Jeff Swindoll

    Jeff Swindoll Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2000
    Messages:
    509
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm pretty sure it's for sexual content

    There's a scene where a female character lifts her head out from between another female character's legs and with the other's glistening juices on her face says "I like you."

    I had the unrated, knew there was an R rated version, and when I saw that scene suspected that it was definately NOT in the R cut. [​IMG]
     
  9. JohnRice

    JohnRice Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2000
    Messages:
    8,714
    Likes Received:
    139
    Real Name:
    John
    While this is not exactly common, it is not unique. There is also an edited version of Bad Education and Blockbuster famously had an edited version of Audition done or they wouldn't carry it. There was no edited version available of Irreversible, so they didn't carry it. Of course, the irony is, any film which goes to the trouble to be rated and receives an NC-17 is probably pretty legitimate, but Blockbuster won't handle it. Meanwhile, they will carry one that has had gratuitous trash added for no constructive reason, and hasn't been rated.
     
  10. Frank@N

    Frank@N Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2002
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    0
    OMG, that's one heck of a spoiler!

    I'm going to have to keep my eyes open for the unrated version!
     
  11. Mark Bendiksen

    Mark Bendiksen Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 1999
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    0
    The same thing was done for Requiem for a Dream. A special "R" rated version was made (despite protests by the director) simply so stores such as Blockbuster would stock it.
     

Share This Page