1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

WarGames--Back on the Big Screen on July 24th

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Chris Atkins, Jul 2, 2008.

  1. Chris Atkins

    Chris Atkins Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    3,887
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. WillG

    WillG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    Messages:
    5,298
    Likes Received:
    29
    However, it sounds like this is just going to be a digital projection of the upcoming DVD on the big screen, like what has been done for "revivals" of Poltergeist, a Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween in the recent years
     
  3. Tino

    Tino Premium
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Messages:
    7,295
    Likes Received:
    1,202
    Location:
    Metro NYC
    Real Name:
    Valentino
    yup[​IMG]
     
  4. Chris Atkins

    Chris Atkins Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    3,887
    Likes Received:
    0
  5. Greg_S_H

    Greg_S_H Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2001
    Messages:
    15,255
    Likes Received:
    219
    Location:
    North Texas
    Real Name:
    Greg
    I saw it in the theater back then, but I doubt if I would be able to catch the one-time showing even if I wanted to.
     
  6. Dale MA

    Dale MA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,026
    Likes Received:
    97
    Location:
    England
    Real Name:
    Dale
    I'd rather they release it on Blu-ray. [​IMG]
     
  7. TravisR

    TravisR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    24,928
    Likes Received:
    2,763
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    I've seen these type of screenings that was just a DVD projected (Halloween) but lately, I've seen other internet posts saying that they used better sources than a DVD transfer for more recent screenings (like Battlestar Galactica: Razor and others).
     
  8. Douglas Monce

    Douglas Monce Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,514
    Likes Received:
    12

    Actually its not DVD it is high definition. I saw the screening of Poltergeist, and of Star Trek: The The Menagerie, and was very impressed. It was on a fairly small screen but Poltergeist looked almost as sharp as I remember it in its original run on film. It was however cropped to 1.85:1.

    Of course I understand that some theaters in Fathom's chain have better projectors than others so it maybe hit or miss as far as the quality goes. By the way the shows are sent to the theaters live via satellite.

    NCM Fathom. Groundbreaking Cinema Entertainment

    Doug
     
  9. BrettB

    BrettB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2001
    Messages:
    3,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Poltergiest was upconverted dvd (720). I emailed them beforehand and asked what the deal was.
     
  10. TravisR

    TravisR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    24,928
    Likes Received:
    2,763
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    Like I said, I know there's been newer presentations where it was HD but Halloween was without a doubt Anchor Bay's 25th anniversary DVD.
     
  11. mattCR

    mattCR Well-Known Member
    HW Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,469
    Likes Received:
    368
    Location:
    Overland Park, KS
    Real Name:
    Matt
  12. Jonesy

    Jonesy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    0
    There were reports of Fathom's recent screenings of Poltergeist where they played the film panned-and-scanned in some theatres.

    In my opinion, Fathom's screenings are low resolution garbage and don't belong on cinema screens. If they cared at all about their films, they would circulate a bunch of new 35mm, like was done with recently with Blade Runner.

    If you do go to Wargames, and it does look like ass, be sure to complain and ask for your money back.

    Jonesy
    MOVIE THEATRE REVIEWS
     
  13. Douglas Monce

    Douglas Monce Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,514
    Likes Received:
    12


    It sure wasn't where I saw it. I was in the forth row and I would have known if it was up converted DVD. The titles were razor sharp and it was also cropped to 1.85:1. I believe it was the version that was prepared for HD Net.

    I would have been able to tell if it was an unconverted DVD on a 30 foot screen. It was defiantly 1080 though it MAY have been interlaced.

    Doug
     
  14. Chris Atkins

    Chris Atkins Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    3,887
    Likes Received:
    0
    My wife and I enjoyed seeing WarGames on the big screen again (and it is a charming movie, though it seriously loses steam in the second half and could use a good 5-10 minutes cut out of the film).

    However, there were 2 problems:

    1) The satellite transmission went out about 3/4 of the way through the film. We were told this was Fathom's fault, and we believe it since the same thing happened to my brother in law who was viewing the film in a different city. They got it running again after about 15 minutes.

    2) The picture was disappointing. It very much seemed like DVD quality on a big screen. I doubt I will go see any of Fathom's future releases if this is the quality we can expect.
     
  15. Greg_S_H

    Greg_S_H Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2001
    Messages:
    15,255
    Likes Received:
    219
    Location:
    North Texas
    Real Name:
    Greg

    I bet you were scared it was the Russian attack that took down the transmission. [​IMG]

    "Impact!"
     
  16. cafink

    cafink Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Messages:
    3,045
    Likes Received:
    36
    I just got back from WarGames, which I had actually never seen before. I quite liked it. I work as a computer programmer, and I was extremely surprised by how well a 25-year-old movie about computers can hold up.

    There were no problems with the presentation at my theater. The image looked fine to me, though I've never been particularly sensitive to that sort of thing. I thought it looked perfectly acceptable and I definitely feel like I got my money's worth from the screening.
     
  17. Greg_S_H

    Greg_S_H Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2001
    Messages:
    15,255
    Likes Received:
    219
    Location:
    North Texas
    Real Name:
    Greg
    You had to have liked Jim and Malvin.

    "That girl's sitting right over there and you're giving away our best secrets!"

    "Mr. Potato Head. Mr. Potato Head! Backdoors are NOT secret!"

    . . .

    "Remember when you told me to tell you when you were being rude and insensitive? You're doing it now."

    I don't know if it'll be quite in the same league, but I would recommend the '84 Cloak and Dagger if you haven't seen it. It's kind of similar, but it manages to blend videogames with a Hitchcockian plot. In fact, it was based on a story by Cornell "Rear Window" Woolrich which was the basis of a noir thriller of the '40s called The Window.
     
  18. Brian D H

    Brian D H Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    0

    I'm sure that helping the sequel was 90% of the point of having these screenings.
     
  19. DaveB

    DaveB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    0
    Our transmission not only went out, but we momentarily saw a MS Windows desktop projected onto the 30' screen. The sound at my theater was thin and the presentation was a little disappointing overall. We all payed a premium above the regular ticket price; in retrospect, they should have charged the discount rate. Still loved the movie though!
     
  20. Chris Atkins

    Chris Atkins Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    3,887
    Likes Received:
    0

    Hmm, I thought the sound was actually quite good. It was the picture I was disappointed in.
     

Share This Page