1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

'To Catch a Thief' - any reviews yet ?

Discussion in 'DVD' started by Deepak Shenoy, Oct 27, 2002.

  1. Deepak Shenoy

    Deepak Shenoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1998
    Messages:
    648
    Likes Received:
    0
    With the release date for 'To Catch a Thief' a little more than a week away, I was wondering if anyone here has managed to get a sneak peek at the DVD.

    Though Paramount generally doesn't disappoint in the picture and sound quality department, it would be nice to know what to expect before I actually get my hands on the DVD.
     
  2. Peter D

    Peter D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2000
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Considering how much restoration work Paramount themselves said it required, I think all fans of the movie are eagerly awaiting word on how well it went. Let's hope it's of the same quality as WB's North by Northwest.
     
  3. Patrick McCart

    Patrick McCart Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    7,512
    Likes Received:
    114
    Location:
    Alpharetta, GA, USA
    Real Name:
    Patrick McCart
    I've heard Lowry Digital Images did some transfers for Paramount, so this might be one of them.

    If so, it should look stunning.
     
  4. GlennH

    GlennH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 1998
    Messages:
    2,135
    Likes Received:
    7
    Real Name:
    Glenn
    I'm waiting to see a review too.

    Meanwhile, Amazon.com is basing their price on an incorrect MSRP for this title ($26.98, when it should be $24.99). I pointed it out to them last week and they thanked me and said they would investigate, but no change yet.
     
  5. DeeF

    DeeF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,683
    Likes Received:
    11
    I saw it.

    Right off the bat, the video is grainy and harsh, and the audio has audible wow and flutter, in other words, also harsh and out of tune.

    Very disappointed. It's nothing like "North by Northwest," (which came from MGM).
     
  6. Craig S

    Craig S Premium
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2000
    Messages:
    5,703
    Likes Received:
    182
    Location:
    League City, Texas
    Real Name:
    Craig Seanor
    Jeffrey Wells over at moviepoopshoot.com talks about this disc in his column today (scroll down to the "Regrettably So" heading). Wells is not really a DVD reviewer but he was so disappointed in how this DVD looks that he took the time to talk to both Paramount's Martin Blythe & film restorer Robert Harris about the disc. The article is worth reading.
    Bottom line - this one is looking like a major letdown.
    Dee, MGM originally produced North By Northwest, but the DVD is from Warner Bros.
     
  7. Brandon Conway

    Brandon Conway captveg

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2002
    Messages:
    7,960
    Likes Received:
    841
    Location:
    North Hollywood, CA
    Real Name:
    Brandon Conway
    And we all know that Paramount doesn't double-dip.... [​IMG]
    In other news, dvdreview seems to think the transfer is just fine.
    Anyone else confused....
     
  8. Craig S

    Craig S Premium
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2000
    Messages:
    5,703
    Likes Received:
    182
    Location:
    League City, Texas
    Real Name:
    Craig Seanor
     
  9. Peter D

    Peter D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2000
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow...after reading that article I'm terribly disappointed. I was really looking forward to this one. [​IMG]
     
  10. Rich Malloy

    Rich Malloy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    3,999
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dang. [​IMG]
     
  11. DeeF

    DeeF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,683
    Likes Received:
    11
    Yeah, I know that Warners owns all the MGM stuff. Warners is responsible for many of our greatest films restored for DVD. I only mentioned MGM (North by Northwest) because Paramount isn't doing the best DVDs these days.

    Also, it's hard to know exactly what state the original materials are in, and who would be responsible for that.

    My Fair Lady was originally Warners, but then rights to the movie reverted to CBS, sometime in the 70s? I think. It was CBS who allowed that movie to become what it became (almost lost). Curiously, the DVD is a Warners product, so I guess it reverted back. (There is a 2-video version from CBS in the 80s that is virtually unwatchable).

    But all this is moot -- To Catch A Thief's transfer is from 1999, done for television. Really, somebody should return to the original Vista Vision elements (according to Harris in that article, they're not in that bad a shape) and then scan these in and clean it up in the digital domain, like Lowry did for North by Northwest.

    Anyway, the DVD is the worst of the widescreen/color Hitchcocks. Marnie looks better.
     
  12. Brandon Conway

    Brandon Conway captveg

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2002
    Messages:
    7,960
    Likes Received:
    841
    Location:
    North Hollywood, CA
    Real Name:
    Brandon Conway


    Ouch.
     
  13. Matt Lucas

    Matt Lucas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 1999
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    11
    To Catch a Thief is literally one of my 10 favorite films.

    But I'm so disappointed by this news that I'm seriously considering canceling my pre-order at Amazon. If it doesn't look much better than VHS, why should I bother upgrading to DVD? [That's a rhetorical question, by the way.] I'll wait for more reviews, but this doesn't smell very good...

    mattl
     
  14. DeeF

    DeeF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,683
    Likes Received:
    11
    Another thing: I was stunned to realize that this disk is anamorphic. I've got plenty of non-anamorphic disks which look a lot better (like Charade).
     
  15. GlennH

    GlennH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 1998
    Messages:
    2,135
    Likes Received:
    7
    Real Name:
    Glenn
    Too bad. I think that just moved it from "buy" to "rent" for me.

    MARNIE was bad, but I thought THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH (1956 version with Jimmy Stewart) was even worse looking. Hard to watch it's so distracting.
     
  16. DeeF

    DeeF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,683
    Likes Received:
    11
    Actually, I haven't seen The Man Who Knew Too Much on DVD.

    This movie was one of the ones that Hitchcock owned and stored himself (like Vertigo and The Trouble With Harry and Rear Window) and famously, Hitchcock trashed most of the original materials (he was advised to do this, circa 1968).

    Anyway, since I haven't seen it, I can't say whether or not it is better or worse than To Catch a Thief.

    Really, these very famous and popular Vista Vision movies should all be given the royal treatment, always. Marnie could look better, as well as these others. And it's time for anamorphic transfers of Vertigo and Psycho -- time to double dip, Paramount.
     
  17. Kajs

    Kajs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2001
    Messages:
    450
    Likes Received:
    0
    White Christmas is another Paramount VistaVision title (the first movie shot in VV) that I think looks horrible. There is a distracting "strobing" effect during the whole movie, why can't all these VV movies be the same quality as NxNW?
     
  18. Scott Shanks

    Scott Shanks Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2001
    Messages:
    381
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Louisville, Ky
    Real Name:
    Scott Shanks
    DeeF,
    North By Northwest is a Warner DVD and Vertigo and Psycho were Universal releases.
    -----------------------
    I am curious to see it there are moire effects on Cary Grant's horizontal pinstripe shirt at the beginning of the movie. It's comical to watch my VHS tape of that part of the movie. You almost feel like the shirt is plugged into something it strobes so bad.
     
  19. DeeF

    DeeF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,683
    Likes Received:
    11
    Yes, I know Scott, I was really referring to Vista Vision.

    But this does bring up an interesting idea: why not a real Hitchcock boxed set? The studios were able to come together for Kubrick. Why not

    Rear Window
    Dial M For Murder
    To Catch A Thief
    The Trouble With Harry
    The Man Who Knew Too Much
    Vertigo
    North By Northwest
    The Wrong Man
    Psycho
    The Birds
    Marnie

    with a separate set for

    Torn Curtain
    Topaz
    Frenzy
    Family Plot

    There are some moires visible (from the striped shirts), but I admit, it's not as bad as it could have been.
     
  20. Scott Shanks

    Scott Shanks Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2001
    Messages:
    381
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Louisville, Ky
    Real Name:
    Scott Shanks
    It's also interesting that this DVD appears to be framed at 1.85:1 when it was shown theatrically (according to imdb) at 1.66:1. Does this mean that this disc falls in the dreaded non-OAR category? In regards to video quality, Rear Window's transfer did not exactly set the world ablaze either, but I certainly enjoyed the movie and the disc very much.
     

Share This Page