1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

TITANIC DVD Cover art- request a change here!

Discussion in 'DVD' started by Nicholas Martin, Aug 8, 2005.

  1. Nicholas Martin

    Nicholas Martin Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    1
    I am following the suggestion provided to me by Bill Hunt, editor of The Digital Bits, and starting this new thread, exclusively for sending complaints and simple requests for a change in the recently revised cover art for "Titanic: 3- disc Special Collector's Edition" DVD.

    This is in response to Paramount adding a very out-of-place image of director James Cameron on the once elegant cover art.

    Mr. Hunt said that he could send the thread link to Paramount so they could read the comments, and hopefully comply with a change, or a simple reversion to the previous design.

    The more you write about how important this is to all of you fans of this great film, the better our chances the studio might listen to our admittedly simple plea.
     
  2. MattHR

    MattHR Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2001
    Messages:
    1,573
    Likes Received:
    84
    I would bet the chances of having the artwork changed back to the Cameron-less original version are slim to none. James Cameron is probably the one who insisted on the revision to include his image. His ego is legendary in Hollywood.
     
  3. JackKay

    JackKay Second Unit

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    0
    show us the cover art.
     
  4. Fabien Renelli

    Fabien Renelli Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    0
    The new cover art is really ugly. I mean, is it a joke ? I can do better with my own Photoshop !!!
     
  5. Mark Lucas

    Mark Lucas Second Unit

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    0
    The cover art is fine because it's derived from the international poster. It's just the picture of Cameron directing Winslet and Leo is more of a picture reserved for a behind the scenes section.
     
  6. Christian Preischl

    Christian Preischl Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2001
    Messages:
    1,376
    Likes Received:
    6
    Real Name:
    Christian Preischl
    Yup, the addition of the "Behind the Scenes" picture messes up a previously classy cover. I'd certainly appreciate a revision.

    Chris
     
  7. Chuck Mayer

    Chuck Mayer Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2001
    Messages:
    8,179
    Likes Received:
    373
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Real Name:
    Chuck Mayer
    Normally, I stay out of "give us" threads, but this is important. I love Jim Cameron and his films, and I appreciate the support studios give him. That said I love movies more, and his Titanic most of all. Please reconsider this cover, which lays bare the fact that this is just a movie, as opposed to a story. It makes the magical clinical, and there is no need for that on the packaging. Yes, I'll watch the extras, yes, this is a great picture for the back cover, and yes, I'll buy it anyway.

    But respect the magic of motion pictures.

    No directors on covers,
    Chuck
     
  8. Harold Wazzu

    Harold Wazzu Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    0
    Put JIM on the back of the cover, not the front, please!!!!!!!!!!
     
  9. PaulP

    PaulP Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2001
    Messages:
    3,291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, please revert back to the original version. The signature can remain, but the photo must go, and also everyone seems to miss the fact that the title of the film has been lower to the middle from the top, and this makes it look very poor design-wise.
     
  10. ZackR

    ZackR Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2003
    Messages:
    611
    Likes Received:
    0
    Please go back to the original cover art. It was simple and elegant and reflected the grand scope of the film. The revised art looks a disjointed with the addition of the awkwardly placed Cameron pic on the cover. The original cover art was excellent. The modified design reduces the size of the ship to facilitate the picture of Cameron and oddly places the title of the film in the middle of the cover. Please reconsider the decision to modify the art.

    FYI, for those who are interested:

    Original Cover Art [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    New Cover Art: [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  11. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    24,971
    Likes Received:
    2,773
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building


    If that were the case then he'd probably be on the R2 set as well. Plus, he's not on the cover of any other of his movies.
     
  12. Bleddyn Williams

    Bleddyn Williams Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1997
    Messages:
    981
    Likes Received:
    1
    Real Name:
    Bleddyn Williams
    I couldn't agree more. Keep the signature, but please restore the artwork to the earlier, less cluttered and out-of-place artwork.

    Also - is it just me, or is that "3-disc set" graphic really old fasnioned? I think we all know what 3 discs look like!
     
  13. Mark Zimmer

    Mark Zimmer Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1997
    Messages:
    4,285
    Likes Received:
    24
    That's Cameron all right: "I'm bigger than the ship!"
     
  14. Magnus T

    Magnus T Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    0
    April fools is still April 1st, isn't it? I bursted out in laughter seeing that artwork! This is 10 times worse than the Kevin Smith picture on the Jersey Girl artwork.
     
  15. Nathan*W

    Nathan*W Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2001
    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Nathan
    I like Cameron as a filmmaker. REALLY like him.

    I DO NOT want him on the front cover.

    Backside or Disc 3 artwork only, please.
     
  16. PaulP

    PaulP Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2001
    Messages:
    3,291
    Likes Received:
    0


    Yeah it's so obviously positioned to look like he's trying to reach the Oscar...
     
  17. Jeff Whitford

    Jeff Whitford Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1998
    Messages:
    1,267
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have to agree. Lose the Cameron picture.
     
  18. JoshB

    JoshB Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2001
    Messages:
    901
    Likes Received:
    0
    Whats the purpose of showing the two main actors TWICE in the cover art, along with Cameron who is not an actor but a film maker? Not only did they ruin what was otherwise a very classy cover art, they make it seem more like its a pure marketing ploy. I thought Cameron was better than this, given that he has devoted quite a bit of time to releasing this SE. There is still some time though but not much to change it.
     
  19. PaulP

    PaulP Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2001
    Messages:
    3,291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here I quickly made my own version, using the main element of the original, and some elements of the revised (upper banner, signature).

    [​IMG]
     
  20. Eric Huffstutler

    Eric Huffstutler Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 1999
    Messages:
    1,303
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    Richmond, VA
    Real Name:
    Eric Huffstutler
    I have to add my .02¢ worth and say that the new art is a disaster in itself. Isn't the movie "Titanic" not "Cameron"??? Why isn't the ship a focal point any longer? I am hoping this is a hoax!

    Have you also noticed the spine is different between the old and new art and look at the numbering. doesn't the old say 03136 and the new 03135 ?
     

Share This Page