1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

3D Blu-ray Review Titanic 3D Blu-ray Review

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Neil Middlemiss, Sep 6, 2012.

  1. Johnny Angell

    Johnny Angell Played With Dinosaurs Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 1998
    Messages:
    5,788
    Likes Received:
    511
    Location:
    Central Arkansas
    Real Name:
    Johnny Angell
    I agree. BTW, Mike, would you have said the same to Neil, face-to-face?
     
  2. Carlo Medina

    Carlo Medina Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 1997
    Messages:
    10,345
    Likes Received:
    563
    Yes he would! :D
    Sometimes the anonymity of the internet really does lower the quality of public discourse...
     
  3. Cameron Yee

    Cameron Yee Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    11,293
    Likes Received:
    506
    Location:
    Since 2006
    Real Name:
    Cameron Yee
    I can't help but point out Mike wasn't just rude to Neil, he was rude to all the reviewers here by suggesting none of us proof our material.

    I don't know if I'm interested in explaining what's polite to someone who doesn't have a working knowledge of what that entails.
     
  4. lukejosephchung

    lukejosephchung Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,393
    Likes Received:
    389
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA., USA
    Real Name:
    Luke J. Chung
    Indeed...there's constructive criticism, then there's what was done to Mr. Middlemiss and your other colleagues, Cameron...blatantly insulting outright dismissal of your hard work. I for one, have no use for it...
     
  5. RolandL

    RolandL Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    3,063
    Likes Received:
    549
    Location:
    Cromwell, CT
    Real Name:
    Roland Lataille
    Yes, there are a few posters who do nothing but complain. I would just ignore their posts and maybe they will go away.
     
  6. Bryan^H

    Bryan^H Producer

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,432
    Likes Received:
    551
    'Titanic' has never been a favorite film of mine either. That isn't to say I didn't enjoy it, just the Billy Zane love triangle was a bit much for me. I always felt it would be so much more powerfu if it was just a simple boy meets girl tragic story. It didn't need an enemy, in my opinion the ship was the enemy. But I guess it wouldn't be a James Cameron film without a little action in between.
    However after reading Neil's review, and your recommendation I am going to buy a copy of this for future use. Plan on getting a 3-D projector down the line, and this will be the film I test it with.
    Thanks guys!
     
  7. earwin

    earwin Auditioning

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2012
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is the finest upconverted 3D film I have ever watched, specifically for new aspect ratio.
    Here's an overview of the new and prevsiously formats:
    new 3D version - 16:9
    2.39 version (it seems that we have less picture in 2.39 than 16:9)
    classic 4:3 version from TV
    and new leaked shot from original panavision camera
     
  8. HDvision

    HDvision Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,056
    Likes Received:
    185
    Location:
    Paris, France
    Real Name:
    David
    Thankx, what is the source of the Panavision shot?
     
  9. Carlo Medina

    Carlo Medina Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 1997
    Messages:
    10,345
    Likes Received:
    563
    Titanic was shot in Super35 so it does make sense that the 2.39 version will have "less picture" than the others. However Cameron was fully aware of what scope he was shooting for theatrically (there are guide bars on the monitors showing him the 2.39 frame) and he no doubt composited for it, so there should be no feeling of "loss of picture" viewing it at 2.39. I recall reading [back in the day] that most of the effects were finished initially only at 2.39 which is why previous home video pan and scan versions of Titanic actually panned and scanned instead of just revealing the entire original frame because the effects wouldn't be there.
    Given the amount of time and money that went into the 3D version, I'm hoping they extended the effects to fill the 1.78 frame so that the entire film is opened up instead of going back to pan and scan during the effects shots.
     
  10. Vincent_P

    Vincent_P Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,848
    Likes Received:
    189
    The effects shots were finished at 2:1 and cropped a bit to 1.78:1 for the 3D version. 2-perf footage of the actual wreck would also be cropped.
    Vincent
     
  11. RolandL

    RolandL Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    3,063
    Likes Received:
    549
    Location:
    Cromwell, CT
    Real Name:
    Roland Lataille
    Caps-a-holic has a 1.78 to 2.35 comparison
     
  12. earwin

    earwin Auditioning

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2012
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually, I found it on official fb page of the movie.
     
  13. earwin

    earwin Auditioning

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2012
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Panavision (Super35) became popular from 90s.
    As a matter of fact, photography directors set the camera originally for 2.39 theatrical picture with consistent coordinates on camera.
    This images from T2, explaining how the Super35 process works.
     

Share This Page