1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

'Starfox Adventures' - Oh boy did Nintendo/Rare drop the ball on this one!

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by Paul_D, Dec 6, 2002.

  1. Paul_D

    Paul_D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2001
    Messages:
    2,056
    Likes Received:
    0
    What a boring game! I am truly astonished at how weak this gaming experience is.

    -The combat system is repetitive, unchallenging, and IMO doesn't make for decent looking fights.
    -There are too few Arwing missions, and they're absurdly easy.
    -The voice acting is truly atrocious. And what's up with the various Scottish etc. accents for random characters?
    -The fur/grass rendering, supposedly revolutionary, just makes the characters look more fake than they would with matte surfaces.
    -There are (so far) zero challenging puzzles. They're all take this object to point A, and then pick up object B. Also, I'm finding it extraordinarily annoying that Fox gasps in wonder every time he finds a 'new' object like a nut, or a scarab bag!
    -The interface is frustrating and poorly conceived.
    -Just a badly designed game IMO. I've played for 3 hours so far and I don't plan on playing any further!
    -If anyone with a PAL machine wants a copy, there's one up for grabs right here.
    -I purchased the game on the strength of the reviews, and how much I loved the previous 2 Starfox games. The flying missions in SA are the best parts, and they're a million miles from capturing the magic of the N64 game.

    Very disappointed with this game. What a bitter way for Rare to go out with Nintendo!

    Am I alone?
     
  2. BertFalasco

    BertFalasco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2001
    Messages:
    850
    Likes Received:
    0
    Very true.
     
  3. EdR

    EdR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  4. Paul_D

    Paul_D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2001
    Messages:
    2,056
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  5. Oscar_R

    Oscar_R Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2001
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    0
    They should have left it as Dinosaur Planet
     
  6. Jeffrey Itterly

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is it really that bad? This is one of about 10 games on my Xmas list....
     
  7. Paul_D

    Paul_D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2001
    Messages:
    2,056
    Likes Received:
    0


    In my honest opinion, yes. My advice=Avoid like the plague.
     
  8. JamesH

    JamesH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2000
    Messages:
    664
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think you've missed the "Starfox Sucks" boat by a couple of months.
     
  9. Paul_D

    Paul_D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2001
    Messages:
    2,056
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  10. Jeffrey Itterly

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hmmmm, strange. I just looked up reveiws from three different sites and they seemed fairly positive.


    8 out of 10
    9 out of 10
    4 out of 5


    I guess I'll skip just to be safe as there are plenty of other games that I'd like to get ahold of....
     
  11. Peter Loan

    Peter Loan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 1998
    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    0
    Those reviews are based more on reputation than merit. With Nintendo and Rare's name attached to the game, the fanboys that write for these sites can't resist. Take it from us, this game is straight poop.
     
  12. Eric C. Mylonas

    Eric C. Mylonas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2002
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    0
    While I don't want to come across as contentious, this game is far from awful.

    No, it's not up to Rare's usual standards, but it's hardly a blight on the world of gaming.

    Yeah, it needed some extra TLC and yeah, it can get repetitive, but it's not the train wreck that some seem to be making it out to be. And, at the very least, it is a fantastic-looking game in 480p and 16:9.

    I'd give it a C+, and not the D- or F many seem to be insisting that it warrants.
     
  13. Cameron Seaman

    Cameron Seaman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 1998
    Messages:
    711
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think I posted this in another SFA thread before, but I'll do it again because it is damn funny.
    [​IMG]
     
  14. Morgan Jolley

    Morgan Jolley Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2000
    Messages:
    8,411
    Likes Received:
    70
    The game was also originally an N64 game called Dinosaur Planet. Nintendo asked Rare to bring it to the GameCube to get some easy sales of the newer console and expand it's library by putting StarFox in the lead role.

    BTW, a NEW StarFox game (in the same vein as the SNES and N64 SF games) is coming next year from Nintendo and Namco.
     
  15. AndyVX

    AndyVX Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2000
    Messages:
    808
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Rare's usual standards"?
    Since Goldeneye, they haven't released a good game IMO. So it doesn't surprise me that people aren't liking SFA all that much.
    Good job Nintendo in letting them go! [​IMG]
     
  16. Kip

    Kip Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2001
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would say their track record has been mixed since Goldenye. I thought that Perfect Dark, Conker, and Banjo Kazooie were great games. As for some of the others, well, not so great.

    Kip
     
  17. Sean Eldridge

    Sean Eldridge Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2000
    Messages:
    272
    Likes Received:
    0
    I rented it and got bored in an hour. Very pretty though.

    Sean
     
  18. Chris Flynn

    Chris Flynn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 1999
    Messages:
    473
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm with Eric on this one.

    I don't think it's nearly as bad as people make it out to be. I'd go so far as to give it a B- rating.

    It's a tad repetitive, and kind of all over the place in terms of finding stuff, and the combat, but I'm enjoying the visuals and the story so far. The space combat scenes are a far cry from Starfox 64, but the game is an adventure game first and foremost, and not an action game.

    They really didn't need the StarFox license for it, as it feels like it was tacked on at the last minute, which is in fact probably what they did.
     
  19. BrianB

    BrianB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2000
    Messages:
    5,211
    Likes Received:
    1
     
  20. Romier S

    Romier S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 1999
    Messages:
    3,533
    Likes Received:
    0
    I will also say I thought Starfox was a good game.
    I rather enjoyed Starfox Adventures and didn't have too much of a problem getting into the game. I do agree that it can be a bit repititious and the first few hours are hard to muddle through. My main contention was with the awful flying sequences that pull you completely out of your main objective and IMO disrupt the flow of the game. Besides that I don't regret my time with Starfox and I'll probably give it another spin in the future when the desire hits me.[​IMG]
     

Share This Page