1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

RIPD quick Review

Discussion in 'Movies' started by mattCR, Jul 18, 2013.

  1. mattCR

    mattCR Well-Known Member
    HW Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,469
    Likes Received:
    368
    Location:
    Overland Park, KS
    Real Name:
    Matt
    Baffling. A setup that could basically be defined as Men in Black for dead people, the jokes came across as overly hammy, the action was somewhat tedious and a completely missing second act. DSent from my Nokia 920 using Tapatalk
     
  2. DaveF

    DaveF Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2001
    Messages:
    16,610
    Likes Received:
    1,154
    Location:
    One Loudoun, Ashburn, VA
    Real Name:
    David Fischer
    Ok then. I was hoping this apparent 10-yr late MIB knockoff would be fun. I'll pass then.
     
  3. Michael Elliott

    Michael Elliott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Messages:
    7,412
    Likes Received:
    176
    Location:
    KY
    Real Name:
    Michael Elliott
    I'll go * 1/2 (out of 4) but yeah, it's a complete misfire. It's obviously trying to be MEN IN BLACK with a touch of GHOSTBUSTERS thrown in but you've also got the "love story" from GHOST, which is just horribly done here. Reynolds is 100% boring in the lead and I'm growing tired of Bridges playing The Dude over and over again. Even worse is that had zero chemistry together and couldn't play off one another. I thought Parker and Bacon were good. The special effects were decent but the imagination of the "monsters" was just downright bad. Is this really what $120+ million gets you????
     
  4. mattCR

    mattCR Well-Known Member
    HW Reviewer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    10,469
    Likes Received:
    368
    Location:
    Overland Park, KS
    Real Name:
    Matt
    I thought it was $160M..

    Look, here are the big issues I had after talking about it with others;

    (1) The setup of them being in other bodies was cute... but it NEVER came into play later; example: Bridges is a hot white woman who occassionally uses it, but you never see freaked out reactions of anyone when they find out he's a guy. The same goes the other way.. Reynolds is a tiny elderly asian man.. who manages to catch his former spouse on a race track to have her STARE UP at him, when we have already established the tiny chinese guy is about a foot shorter then she is..

    (2) Right off the bat we know that they can't be injured or hurt so all of the car chase scenes have absolutely no impact because they are never at any risk.

    (3) The "dead-os" are all unimaginative just blobby characters with big mouths. They are somehow outted by kumin or indian food, which was never at any point explained or even given a throwaway comment.. it just sat there.

    (4) You are right, there is NO chemistry.
     
  5. Afiger

    Afiger Active Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2013
    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Daniel
    I saw it in 3D, but honestly I have no idea why it was even in 3D. They didn't seem to have a whole lot of scenes designed for it. The cownboy jargon got pretty old and the story was sort of a flop. I kept waiting for something awesome to happen and it never did. Oh well, another $11 down the drain.
     
  6. Aaron Silverman

    Aaron Silverman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 1999
    Messages:
    10,464
    Likes Received:
    481
    Location:
    Florida
    Real Name:
    Aaron Silverman
    It's actually based on a comic book from 2001.

    Of course, Men In Black was based on a comic book from 1990. :)
     

Share This Page