1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Reason why Star Wars delayed til 2006? Purists won't like it!

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by andrew markworthy, Sep 11, 2001.

  1. andrew markworthy

    andrew markworthy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 1999
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    11
    I don't think this argument's been raised before, but apologies in advance if it has. [Warning - there are some spoilers ahead for anyone who hasn't seen episodes 4-6]
    We are in a mindset to a greater or lesser extent of thinking of Episodes 1-3 as a prequel to the 'proper' Star Wars (i.e. episodes 4-6). But future generations will see Star Wars as beginning, logically enough, with Episode 1. Now if that's so, there's quite a bit of Episodes 4-6 which will not have the dramatic impact it did for those who saw these episodes first. Things like the issues of Luke's and Leia's parentage, the past of Darth Vader and Obi-Wan, etc, etc. Indeed, the dramatic high spot of TESB, when Luke discovers who his dad really is, is likely to lose all its suprise. So, perhaps in order to re-inject some drama, Lucas wants to re-edit Episodes 4-6 to include e.g. flashbacks, etc. This would give the movies greater continuity with episodes 1-3. Purists won't like this, but in the context of the entire series of movies it makes some sense. This would explain why Lucas is delaying far more than the 'we want to put together a really good package of extras' explanation, which has always rung hollow. Fans would buy these things bare bones, with snapper cases at 50 dollars apiece.
    Personally, I concur with practically everyone else here in wanting a vanilla edition now (though no snapper cases or 50 dollars price tag!) and a fancy one in 2006. Heck, I'm not even a great fan of the movies (and why some guys have it as practically a religion is beyond me), but I'm feeling a definite gap in my DVD collection.
     
  2. Dan Brecher

    Dan Brecher Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 1999
    Messages:
    3,452
    Likes Received:
    0
    Without yet knowing how Lucas has taken to revealing aspects of the story in Episode 2 and 3, it's still rather hard to tell that they may ultimately take away some of the surprise seen in the later films, most notably Empire Strikes Back.
    There are ways of telling the stories and fates of characters in the latter two prequels without spoiling elements of the final 3 installments of the series, and I think Lucas will be judged on his merits of being a writer and director most in how he handles these aspects come time of their release (Epsiode 3's especially).
    What's funny now though, is that we now WANT Lucas to release multiple versions of the movies. We've ranted and ranted over the fact he's milked the VHS markets so much with re-issue upon re-issue, and now we're a bit miffed he's not doing the same stunt on DVD.
    I wont deny I'd love anamorphic releases of eps 4, 5 & 6 and would be happy to have them now with no more supplements then the SE LD box set had (trailers and a 30 min documentary). I've VERY lucky to own the two LD box set incarnations of the movie, so the wait for more Star Wars on DVD is not as infuriating to me as it is to others.
    The Q&A from the recent expo at the Ranch for the DVD is worth reading because it really shows the time, care and attention put into their want to do TPM on DVD right. It's a very revealing session regarding Lucas and his companies view on doing these things.
    Dan (UK)
     
  3. Paul_D

    Paul_D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2001
    Messages:
    2,056
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't get me wrong. I'm as much a fan of the Star Wars saga as the next film buff. They're a part of my childhood that I look back at with fondness - huddling round the tv set at Christmas to see another installment for the 100th time.
    But all this anger and relentless whining about re-releasing the original trilogy has me kind of mystified. Why does it mean THAT much to some people to own a set of films that they already own in countless other formats. It just strikes me as a major wate of time and energy, for slightly improved image resolution. As has been stated above, one the one hand Lucas's policy of re-releasing over and over provokes criticism and anger, and yet at the same time complainers, move onto another thread and protest that the latest re-release hasn't come out yet. My God, Lucas is probably just forming his release policy after reading these threads and chuckling all the way to the bank.
    The comment about Star Wars as a religion is difficult to grasp, but nevertheless certainly true. But if a new format for reading books came out other than the printed page, would all the Christians of the world campaign until their throats are soar and keyboards worn out to have the Bible rendered in this new format, just as the Star Wars fanatics have done.
    Obviously the other posters in this thread do not fall into this gruop, but IMO, those that are really need to put it into some perspective. I mean IMO the first and third films arent even THAT good. And the SE material does NOT sit well with the original material at all.
    One additional comment, that doesn't really relate to my main point: The one shot in the original trilogy that coul have benefitted from being re-done was at the end of Episode 4, when one the Allied ships crashes into the death-star, it looks unbelievably crappy and just like a garage special effect. Just felt like mentioning that.
    Just me two-cents. I've had my rant now... ahhhh. that felt good!!!!!
     
  4. TheoGB

    TheoGB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    0
    Come on Paul. Surely that crash into the Death Star is fine compared to the awful matte lines around the Rancor by the time we get to Jedi? [​IMG] They didn't even seem to have TRIED to get rid of them. I'm sure they could have made some good changes there.
    We can hope that when the movies appear in SE form on DVD there will have been additional mastering to make the new stuff sit better with the old.
    Ho hum.
    Theo
     
  5. Inspector Hammer!

    Inspector Hammer! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 1999
    Messages:
    11,067
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Real Name:
    John Williamson
    quote,
    "It just strikes me as a major wate of time and energy, for slightly improved image resolution."
    Paul, your not seriously reffering to dvd are you!?!
    ------------------
    "How can I heal, when I can't feel time?"
    Leonard from Memento
    [Edited last by John Williamson on September 11, 2001 at 07:13 AM]
     
  6. Adam_S

    Adam_S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2001
    Messages:
    6,257
    Likes Received:
    102
    Real Name:
    Adam_S
    Star wars can't work as a twelve hour movie, and lucas is just once again showing he never really understood why SW worked in the first place (anyone else notice the two really good films he's directed were both edited by his wife).
    there are many reasons why phantom menace won't work as the first part of the saga, and that is that IT NEVER INTRODUCES YOU INTO THE STAR WARS UNIVERSE!
    think on this, within thirty minutes of A New Hope we're told what the force is, what the jedi are, what a lightsaber is, and about a war going on (which we've already been manipulated to root for one side); because not only have they been clearly established as the underdogs, but the other side is full dead shots in white armor and o a really nasty commander, all in black, who kills casually, crushing one man's throat with his bare hand.
    now in TPM when was the force explained? oh that's righ it wasn't.
    when were what the jedi are explained? oh once agian not explained.
    when was a lightsaber explained? once agian they weren't in fact the only time lightsabers are referred to, is erroneously as a lasersword.
    in fact the only things explained, are those new to the SW canon, like midicholorians.
    sounds good to me, don't explain three basic tenets of a universe until into the 7th to 8th hour of the saga, right... that's a great idea.
    [​IMG]
    Adam
    [Edited last by Adam_S on September 11, 2001 at 05:55 PM]
     
  7. Paul_D

    Paul_D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2001
    Messages:
    2,056
    Likes Received:
    0
    In response to the Estella Warren admirer, It's my view that shaking your fist with rage at the creators of a few films because they don't want to release their movies on DVD when you've got the Dolby Digital, non-anamorphic laserdiscs sitting at home that deliver excellent image and sound quality, is lunacy.... SHEER lunacy!
     
  8. Joseph Bolus

    Joseph Bolus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 1999
    Messages:
    2,227
    Likes Received:
    43
    I, personally, am bitterly disappointed that I won't have an opportunity to view the OT on DVD until 2006.
    I have never owned a LD player and, as a result, the best version of the OT that I own is the VHS Widescreen release of the '97 SE's.
    As we all know, a 2.35:1 transfer rendered via VHS "Letterboxing" results in only around 160 lines or so of actual vertical resolution.
    It boggles the mind that, for those of us without LD players, we will be forced into feeding our 16:9 HDTV monitors with this transfer of the OT well into the second half of the first decade of the 21st Century! (Not to mention the fact that I’m ready to retire my analog VHS HI-FI deck NOW! The only reason this component is still part of my HT is due to Star Wars and Indy …)
    For the first time in my life I am seriously considering purchasing a LD player ...
    ------------------
    Joseph
    ---------------
    "As a matter of cosmic history, it has always been easier to destroy, than to create."
     
  9. Inspector Hammer!

    Inspector Hammer! Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 1999
    Messages:
    11,067
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Real Name:
    John Williamson
    But you see Paul, that's just it, I DON'T have the LD's sitting at home, so sure i'm going to shake my fist with rage. Do you think what you've stated is of any consolation to the millions of dvd player owners out their without LD players?
    And yes, a good anamorphic dvd transfer absolutly buries an LD transfer any day of the week and twice on Sunday!
    quote,
    "to the Estella Warren admirer"
    Oh yeh, I admirer her all right! [​IMG]
    ------------------
    "How can I heal, when I can't feel time?"
    Leonard from Memento
     
  10. Anders Englund

    Anders Englund Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 1999
    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  11. alan halvorson

    alan halvorson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 1998
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  12. Kimmo Jaskari

    Kimmo Jaskari Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2000
    Messages:
    1,529
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh, I agree. Or rather, we learned all the wrong things about The Force in EP1. Midichlorians??
    The Force was much better when it was a mystical force created by all living things. Nobody really knew how it worked but it was perilously close to magic for the uninitiated. Perfect.
    Then of course along comes EP1 and totally fouls things up, in my opinion.
    This was the same mistake they made in the Highlander series movies. They couldn't just stick with the intriguing mystery of the first movie, but had to invent some sort of explanation that, of course, made no sense whatsoever and turned the follow-up movies into accidental comedies. Highlander Endgame at least was true to the spirit of the first movie, so they eventually learned their lesson. Perhaps by episode 7 or 8 Mr Lucas will get it too... not holding my breath tho. [​IMG]
    I don't think its really possible to make the movie series work as a nine-parter either. Not credibly. If it had started with Ep IV, then sure. From EP1...? Hmm.
    ------------------
    /Kimmo
     
  13. cafink

    cafink Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Messages:
    3,045
    Likes Received:
    36
     
  14. Loring

    Loring Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2000
    Messages:
    71
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok what we all are forgetting here is (story wise) histories where lost due to the wars and also Empire's rise to power. Teachers of the Jedi and Historians where hunted and killed.
    Also another point is there is a gap in time (may not be until all three movies are done and over with) between the first trilogy and the new trilogy that we are now seeing.
    The new trilogy is working on the fact that we have already know about the Starwars Universe as it was set up for us in the Original Trilogy. But was only hinted to was the Clone Wars. The rise of the Empire. The story of the parents of Luke and Leia. We only know that their father fell to the Darkside and became Darth Vader and he was an accomplished pilot before the fall. These things are now being revealed to us in the new trilogy. Also we get to see a bit of the history of what brought all of are favorite characters together or to the point in their lives that we first saw them at.
    I am glad to at least have new Starwars movies. I just wish everyone would take it for what it is a fictional work and remember its just entertainment.
    ------------------
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    ~Loring
     
  15. Adam_S

    Adam_S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2001
    Messages:
    6,257
    Likes Received:
    102
    Real Name:
    Adam_S
    sorry for the massive amounts of typos in my last, post, I typed that in about three minutes as I was in a rush to get to class on time (turned out to be not so important today [​IMG] )
    what I was speaking about on the lightsabers was:
    never once are we told in TPM what a lightsaber is, or even that is indeed called a lightsaber. Compare the first reference to a lightsaber in ANH to the first reference to a lightsaber in TPM)
     
  16. Tom Ryan

    Tom Ryan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2001
    Messages:
    1,044
    Likes Received:
    0
    Adam.....what you're talking about could actually be a good thing. The origins of the Jedi and the things that characterize them could remain unexplained for a few episodes, preserving their mystery. You would accept them either way if seeing the Saga through for the first time from 1-6, but as everything is explained along the way, you would find the questions you ask yourself being answered one by one.
    -Tom
    ------------------
    There is nothing wrong with any of the surrounds on your Forrest Gump DVD! It's ok!!!
     
  17. Greg_Y

    Greg_Y Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 1999
    Messages:
    1,479
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  18. Gary Rhine

    Gary Rhine Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2000
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am not a big Star Wars fan but it makes sense to me to release the DVD's in order. What I don't understand is why the movies were not made in order. Was there a good reason?
    Also, God Bless America.
    ------------------
    Gary J. Rhine
    My Home Theater
     
  19. Jeff Ulmer

    Jeff Ulmer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 1998
    Messages:
    5,593
    Likes Received:
    0
    I will not be happy with the release of Star Wars on DVD until the original theatrical versions are available. Fortunately, I do have the laserdiscs, but I would prefer to see this groundbreaking and cinematically importat work preserved as originally released.
    ------------------
    Zardoz Online | Burt Lancaster is The Swimmer | dOc
     
  20. Brian Lawrence

    Brian Lawrence Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1998
    Messages:
    3,634
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Brian
     

Share This Page