Chris Atkins
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2002
- Messages
- 3,885
I still think it's a good idea for your characters to have clear motivations.
I'm going to see the movie to be entertained, not to try and read something into the movie that's not there or to learn a valuable life lesson.That seems to be the problem with Reloaded and it sounds like its the problem with Revolutions. Yes, people want to be entertained. But with the first Matrix, there was much more. It had philosophic and religious undertones that needed to be explored further. I think people were expecting this to be the focus of the last two movies. I love the action scenes as much as anyone else but they mean nothing in the grand scheme of things. The Matrix could have set itself apart from other science fiction movies but instead they chose the entertain people first then work on story and characters route. Reloaded got decent buzz when it came out because most people were saying that Revolutions would clear up everything. The set up was pretty nice. These movies would have been big blockbusters no matter which way they made them. People will go see Revolutions just because it's the matrix. I am going to see it later and hopefully I won't be disappointed.
I still think it's a good idea for your characters to have clear motivations.But the Merovingian does have clear motivations...he wants more power. Sounds like you want more complex motivations, which is a different argument entirely.
But the Merovingian does have clear motivations...he wants more power. Sounds like you want more complex motivations, which is a different argument entirely.Look...here is a foil for our hero...the Merovingian! He wants more power...therefore he must keep the Keymaker from Neo!
Now...audience must hate Merovingian and route for Neo!
Doesn't work for me, Marvin.
Look...here is a foil for our hero...the Merovingian! He wants more power...therefore he must keep the Keymaker from Neo!
Now...audience must hate Merovingian and route for Neo!
Doesn't work for me, Marvin.I'd agree with you if the Merovingian was ever set up as anything other than a secondary (almost tertiary) character. If that's all they ever said about Agent Smith I'd have more of a problem, but that would tie back into my Jedi reference...if Darth Vader was never given any motivation, I'd care, but I don't really wonder or care what Jabba or Boba Fett's or Greedo's motivations may have been other than money. It just isn't important to me from a minor character.
well, thats fine and dandy, but again...it sounds alot like the SW fans rationalizing the 'so amazingly inferior in every way that it actually degrades the previous better entries by association' Jedi.ROTJ was the exact complement to Revolutions. Revolutions (and Reloaded by not providing a good setup) somehow took the bite out of the Neo v Smith angle. But I cared about Zion and the machines (01 was under-used, shoulda been 1/2 the movie). In ROTJ I didn't care about the Ewoks or anything about Jabba's folk, but the whole movie (thanks to a great setup by ESB) was all about building up to Luke v Vader. And what a payoff that Neo v Smith just didn't have.
I know Neo & Smith had the nemesis relationship on paper but it doesn't come across well in either Matrix sequel. That's my biggest letdown. But the movie was visually beautiful, and because of that I'm happy with it.
BTW, I didn't need any more of the Merovingian... his Reloaded expose on causal relationships was laughable (and getting worse with each viewing). I would have liked... more 01 and even more Neo.
And I'd look forward to Matrix: Resolutions when the W's do go poor.
Question : How do the machines get the humans to reproduce, the humans don't just spontaneously end up in a machine tub in the middle of a story machine field.Test tube babies: Eggs and sperm would be extracted mechanically.