1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

*** Official KILL BILL: VOLUME 2 Discussion Thread

Discussion in 'Movies' started by JonZ, Apr 13, 2004.

  1. JonZ

    JonZ Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 1998
    Messages:
    7,794
    Likes Received:
    7
    James Bs review..........

    http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/mo...ill_bill2.html

    And from DH....

    "DavisDVD reports that filmmaker Quentin Tarantino has some major plans for his latest opus, Kill Bill. While promoting the second volume of the series, opening theatrically on April 16th, Tarantino revealed that he plans to recut both films together for a special theatrical release later in the year.

    "We did a special version [of Volume 1] for Japan that's only been shown in Japan and Hong Kong, and I kept the rights to that," Tarantino said. "I'll put the Japanese version together [with Volume 2] like I would if it was one complete movie, and then I'll release that throughout America and Europe in arthouse engagements."

    Tarantino also promises more extensive DVD plans for the revenge films. "I'm going to do a special collector's edition of both of them once I'm finished with both of them," he said. Also in the talking phase, Tarantino is considering the possibility of releasing stand-alone supplemental discs. "One of the things that I saw that I liked... was what the American Pie guys did with their 'Beneath the Crust' documentaries. I want to do the same thing [for Kill Bill]."
     
  2. Lou Sytsma

    Lou Sytsma Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 1998
    Messages:
    5,718
    Likes Received:
    230
    Real Name:
    Lou Sytsma
    Poland over at the Hot Button really lays it on KB2 today.
     
  3. Chuck Mayer

    Chuck Mayer Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2001
    Messages:
    8,179
    Likes Received:
    373
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Real Name:
    Chuck Mayer
    Lou,
    I just read that. To be fair, he didn't like the first one much, but I give him the props for digging in on #2, in light of the overwhelming praise it's getting.

    He certainly isn't gentle.

    Take care,
    Chuck
     
  4. JonBoriss

    JonBoriss Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sounds like sour grapes to me. I don't think I have seen any proof of critics giving a good review to a film just so the director does more work. His comments about Carradine may be right but then I have heard countless reviews saying the contrary, that he should get oscar consideration. Is there a mass critic conspiracy of Kung Fu fans to get Carradine more work that he just wasn't apart of? It sounds like he just wants to go against the grain and get noticed. Its easy to critisize a film that everyone loves because you get more attention for it. He didn't like the film, thats fine, opinions, I respect his opinion. What I don't care for is when people write reviews of films and don't even talk about the film for half of the review. Reminds me of a time when I read a Return of the King review and about 80% of it was the reviewer critisizing New Line and Jackson for releasing multiple versions of the film
     
  5. Chuck Mayer

    Chuck Mayer Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2001
    Messages:
    8,179
    Likes Received:
    373
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Real Name:
    Chuck Mayer
    Jon,
    Dave doesn't seem the kind of critic to be contrary just to be contrary.

    That said, I do believe he has a real hard spot with splitting one film into two for profit, and he has that first and foremost on his mind when he watches the film. I feel it might color his opinion. As I stated, he disliked the first movie was well. And I loved the first film, so I'll be seeing the second regardless.

    But based on his comments (putting all the action in #1 to establish a fanbase), and James B's review mentioning what should have been culled, I wonder it DP isn't right about Miramax's plan. No matter. I do think this could have been a legendary 3 hour film. Maybe it will be in one of it's DVD iterations.

    Take care,
    Chuck
     
  6. JonBoriss

    JonBoriss Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well when I say contrary I guess I mean that a critic gets excited for a film and doesn't think its that good but then everyone else around him likes it and that makes him hate it even more. Like when I saw Donnie Darko I thought it was a pretty OK movie, nothing great. But all these people around me kept singing its praises like it was the best film of the last decade and that made me dislike the movie a little bit more. All the hype and reviews arond the Kill Bill franchise I'll bet affected his review in some way which turns into him critisizing other critics.
     
  7. Quentin

    Quentin Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Messages:
    2,670
    Likes Received:
    100
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Quentin H
    I think Poland's vehemence comes from two places - first of all, he is very pissed that QT and Miramax are taking us to the bank with two "volumes". It does smack of greed (or at least trying to best cash in on an overbudget film), and I see his problem. Didn't keep me from enjoying Vol. 1.

    But, I think the other problem gnawing at Poland is that this FILM (that is, in one volume) should have been great. Like Chuck said, I think it would have been a LEGENDARY 3 hour vengeance/genre epic if the "volumes" had been combined and about an hour of garbage trimmed. I do believe him when he says he really wanted to like it. He's a big "Pulp Fiction" fan, and this film could have challenged PF as QT's best, if it had been one big badass.
     
  8. Dennis Pagoulatos

    Dennis Pagoulatos Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 1999
    Messages:
    868
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    CA
    Real Name:
    Dennis
    I personally wouldn't have wanted anything in Vol.1 edited out, and I'm sure the same is true for Vol. 2, and it's LONGER than Vol.1 at over 2 hours...so we're actually talking about a 4 hour film when it's all stitched back together. NO WAY you can expect to release that and make any money, not even if it were called "Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship Kills Bill". [​IMG]

    I think 4 hour films are for hard core fans (very small %) and for DVD (regular fans and everybody else)

    -Dennis
     
  9. JonBoriss

    JonBoriss Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    0
    If anything I think that Miramax took a risk. There was no guaruntee that people would show up for vol 1, I thought it was gonna flop. He seems mad after the fact that vol 1 made money. Yeah it sucks but I would rather have it this way then 2 hours on the cutting room floor.
     
  10. tyler payne

    tyler payne Second Unit

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    0
    Something kind of interesting, I was going through some of my old Entertainment Weekly mags and... what? No I don't subscribe, really I don't, it got delivered to my house by accident, yeah, yeah that's the ticket. Anywho, they did a story on Kill Bill Vol. 1 on there October 3, 2003 issue. Here is an interesting blurb in the article...




    It doesn't really give any definite clarification as to who had the idea of splitting it up first. Tarantino, or Harvey? I just thought that is was an interesting blurb.

    As for Inglorious Bastards ( I know it is off topic). It will be interesting to see if Harvey will greenlight a three picture deal for Tarantino, when they wanted to condense Lord of the Rings to one movie.
     
  11. Lou Sytsma

    Lou Sytsma Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 1998
    Messages:
    5,718
    Likes Received:
    230
    Real Name:
    Lou Sytsma

    Exactly so, Quentin.
     
  12. JonZ

    JonZ Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 1998
    Messages:
    7,794
    Likes Received:
    7
    Off topic....

    "As for Inglorious Bastards....."

    Tarantino over writes everything. I think both Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown would be tighter films if they trimmed about 10 minutes of each,especially in the Bruce Willis story in PF.

    Anyway, QT has already said he had to throw Bastards in a drawer and forget about it because he couldnt stop writting it.Hes said he wanted to write a War Epic, and ended up writting enough for 3 movies.

    If Kill Bill had to be split up for time, I can only imagine what theyll do with his 300+ page Blastards script (that isnt even finished yet)
     
  13. Scott Weinberg

    Scott Weinberg Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    7,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    To the 2.4 of those who were asking for it [​IMG] here's my Kill Bill: Vol. 2 review.

    Enjoy the movie, everyone!
     
  14. Xenia Stathakopoulou

    Xenia Stathakopoulou Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2003
    Messages:
    2,417
    Likes Received:
    0
    Scott, nice review !I have 2 questions for you ,does this film start in the first 5 minutes with as big a bang as volume 1 ?Also my next question you might have to answer in spoiler tags, does the bride die ?
     
  15. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    28,178
    Likes Received:
    3,872
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    This thread is now designated the Official Discussion Thread for "Kill Bill: Volume 2" please, post all comments, links to outside reviews, film and box office discussion items to this thread.

    All HTF member film reviews of "Kill Bill: Volume 2" should be posted to the Official Review Thread.

    Thank you for your consideration in this matter.


    Crawdaddy
     
  16. paul_v

    paul_v Second Unit

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2000
    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ebert gave it 4 stars and said

    "Of the original "Kill Bill," I wrote: "The movie is all storytelling and no story. The motivations have no psychological depth or resonance, but are simply plot markers. The characters consist of their characteristics." True, but one of the achievements of "Vol. 2" is that the story is filled in, the characters are developed, and they do begin to resonate, especially during the extraordinary final meeting between The Bride and Bill -- which consists not of nonstop action but of more hypnotic dialogue and ends in an event that is like a quiet, deadly punch line.

    Put the two parts together, and Tarantino has made a masterful saga that celebrates the martial arts genre while kidding it, loving it, and transcending it. I confess I feared that "Vol. 2" would be like those sequels that lack the intensity of the original.

    But this is all one film, and now that we see it whole, it's greater than its two parts; Tarantino remains the most brilliantly oddball filmmaker of his generation, and this is one of the best films of the year."


    I can't wait to see it. I just watched vol 1 for the first time a couple of days ago and I've watched it two more times since.
     
  17. Lou Sytsma

    Lou Sytsma Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 1998
    Messages:
    5,718
    Likes Received:
    230
    Real Name:
    Lou Sytsma
    Good review Scott. One really good movie packaged into 2 average/good movies depending on your personal preferences.

    I'd love to see that dream cut of the 2 volumes into 1 movie.
     
  18. Haggai

    Haggai Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Messages:
    3,883
    Likes Received:
    0
    Back from the first showing of the day, my butt was there at 11 AM. I agree with Scott W. that there's some stuff that could have been cut without losing much of anything, but I guess I didn't feel like there was as much of it as Scott did. The stuff with Budd at the bar/strip joint stands out as something that I wouldn't have missed, although it was somewhat entertaining. But there's not much stuff I would have cut, nor did I think there was in Vol. 1 either.

    Anyway, on to some of my favorite details. The whole climax with The Bride, Bill, and the kid was really awesome, even better than I could have hoped for. I absolutely identified with a lot of what Bill was saying as he explained his actions to her. And all the re-union moments with Beatrix and B.B. were great, I was completely moved by that.

    Several great touches in the final credits, which were very long, but well worth it. Bill's operational nickname (like Cottonmouth for O-Ren, Copperhead for Vernita) is revealed as "Snake Charmer," which certainly makes sense! And I was wondering what happened to Elle Driver--was she dead, just blinded with no eyes, what? When the names of the actors come up in the black-and-white part of the credits, over the image of Uma in the car, the other actors' names (Lucy, Vivica, Madsen) are crossed off as they come up, but Daryl Hannah gets a big question mark! So it really is a mystery. [​IMG] And I loved the last little bit with Uma's credit--aka The Bride, aka Beatrix Kiddo, aka Black Mamba, and...aka Mommy. Very nice touch.
     
  19. Haggai

    Haggai Producer

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Messages:
    3,883
    Likes Received:
    0
    Another funny bit was Budd saying, "She cut through 88 bodyguards with that sword?" and Bill answering, "there aren't really 88 of them, they just use that name because they think it sounds cool." [​IMG]
     
  20. Richard_D_Ramirez

    Richard_D_Ramirez Second Unit

    Joined:
    May 21, 2001
    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    0

    Yes, worth it. The best bit was David Carradine's credit as Bill. While everyone else's credit showed nice flashback moments, Carradine's credit showed only his corpse! [​IMG]

    And wow, what a way for Bill to "exit stage left...." [​IMG]

    8^B
     

Share This Page