1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

*** Official G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra Review Thread

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Shad R, Aug 5, 2009.

  1. Shad R

    Shad R Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2001
    Messages:
    537
    Likes Received:
    0
    I saw the film yesterday.
    While there are some good special effects, and a few nifty action sequences, this movie on a whole was a huge letdown. There are some MAJOR plotholes, some pretty fuzzy math, and a plot device at the end of the movie for that "emotional" impact that betrays the entire G.I. Joe history.
    This movie was also poorly acted and very cheesy.
    Overall I give it a C-, if only for the scene where Baroness and Storm Shaddow invade Joe headquarters. That was actually a really cool scene. Too bad the rest of the movie was not as cool.
     
  2. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    28,176
    Likes Received:
    3,872
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    This thread is now the Official Review Thread for "G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra". Please post all HTF member reviews in this thread.

    Any other comments, links to other reviews, or discussion items will be deleted from this thread without warning!

    If you need to discuss those type of issues then I have designated an
    Official Discussion Thread.



    Crawdaddy
     
  3. Patrick Sun

    Patrick Sun Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    38,556
    Likes Received:
    382
    I kept my expectations at low levels (plus, I'm not all that steeped in G.I. Joe lore), and what director Sommers has brought to the big screen is 2 hours of a live-action adaptation of a G.I. Joe cartoon, mainly in terms of cartoon physics, action sequences, violence, weapons, flashback sequences, character interplay, etc. It feels like a film targeted to 8 year old boys, and given Hasbro's stake in the production, no wonder the film's tone and aspirations are so limited in scope (and deaths are kept to the bloodness variety for the most part). The CGI looked bad in various spots in the film.

    But make no mistake, if you like crazy action movies, this movie is almost balls-to-the-walls action sequence after action sequences, with some screenwriting attempts to toss in some emotional relational undercurrents between characters, though not all that convincing in most of those types of scenes. It wasn't as bad as I thought it would be (given Sommers' cinematic pedigree), and there are a few cheesy moments, but there are also a couple of sequences that brought a smile to my face, so it wasn't a dreadful viewing experience because the film stomps on the gas pedal for most of the running time and never lets up.

    I don't think fans of the comics and cartoons will like some of the changes found in the movie, though.

    I give it 2 stars or a grade of C (maybe a half star more if kids are the audience).
    Edited by Patrick Sun - 8/8/2009 at 03:08 am GMT
     
  4. Diallo B

    Diallo B Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,076
    Likes Received:
    1
    it was no where near as bad as i thought it was going to be. as the above stated it was definitely a live action cartoon. but i am sure that they skated by with that pg-13 rating. some of the violence was graphic.

    with all of that said i would go see it again. it was definitely worth it for the action scenes and the backstory of SOME of the characters was somewhat compelling. the editing was surprisingly fluid. after transformers and terminator i was expecting far worse.

    and honestly i would probably watch this again before i would watch transformers or terminator again.

    worth a matinee at least.
    Edited by Diallo B - 8/7/2009 at 10:10 pm GMT
     
  5. Brett_M

    Brett_M Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,396
    Likes Received:
    58
    Location:
    Mos Eisley Spaceport
    Real Name:
    Brett Meyer
    Saw this with my kids today. I read the paperback novelization last week so I knew every beat. It was still an enjoyable. It's big and cheesy and the script is very brisk -- dense with information. The action was well staged and the characters all got to shine. I am a huge Snake Eyes fan from way back and Ray Park did not disappoint. The ladies were nice -- Sienna Miller looked gorgeous as Baroness and Rachel Nichols' Scarlett was stunning. Overall, fun stuff. It was a nice first entry in the series. It's better than both Transformers and Terminator Salvation.

    It's worth a look on the big screen.

    ***.5/*****
     
  6. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    28,176
    Likes Received:
    3,872
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    I took in a matinee today and thought it was better than the Terminator and Transformers movies of this summer. Of course that's not saying much, but I had a good time watching it. I agree with most of what the previous two reviews had to say about this film and would give the film a B- as a summer live action cartoon.




    Crawdaddy
     
  7. Terry Hickey

    Terry Hickey Second Unit

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2001
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    6
    Saw this today and I thought it was an enjoyable, good popcorn action flick. I would rate it around a B- also. It was mainly non-stop action without the gratuitous blood and gore that some films think they need to have. I'm sure it was aimed for the youngsters, but I enjoyed it.
     
  8. Simon Massey

    Simon Massey Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Messages:
    2,315
    Likes Received:
    161
    Location:
    Kuwait
    Real Name:
    Simon Massey
    A film based on a toy-line aimed at and appropriate for its target audience!!!! Whatever next!!

    Though Im not a fan of Sommers films I applaud him for this.
     
  9. Chuck Mayer

    Chuck Mayer Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2001
    Messages:
    8,179
    Likes Received:
    373
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Real Name:
    Chuck Mayer
    I'll make it simple:

    Remember Flag Points? www.yojoe.com/archive/mailin/flagpointinsert.shtml

    I do. I am the perfect age for the 3 and 3/4 inch figures. I collected them into Junior High (I was a nerd), and was a huge fan of the comic during it's brightest days (#25 - #50, though I read for a year or two after that). I know my GI Joe pretty well. So it is with some satisfaction (and some frustration) that I enjoyed this movie. I thought all hope for Sommers was lost with Van Helsing (after a decent Deep Rising and a tolerable Mummy adventure). But he found something tailor made for him.

    How to best quantify my rating? I'll go old school:

    Opening sequence: 0 Flag Points
    Basically wasting Joseph Gordon-Levitt: -50 Flag Points
    Eccleston: 10 Flag Points
    Multiple action scenes: 5 Flag Points
    Unironically mirroring Team America: 0 Flag Points
    Accelerator Suits: -10 Flag Points (I expected a lot worse)
    The Pitt: 10 Flag Points
    The Pitt Infiltration: 25 Flag Points
    Being International instead of a Real American Hero: -25 Flag Points
    Cover Girl: 15 Flag Points
    Scarlett: 20 Flag Points
    High-Tech Crossbow: -5 Flag Points
    Rachel Nichols: 50 Flag Points
    Snake-Eyes done basically right: 25 Flag Points
    Snake-Eyes silence: 10 Flag Points
    Screwing up why he is mute: -10 Flag Points
    No Timber: -5 Flag Points
    Kid Fighting: 10 Flag Points per occurrence = 30 Flag Points
    Byung-hun Lee as Storm Shadow: 50 Flag Points
    Always wearing white and using throwing stars: 15 Flag Points
    Dialogue: -15 Flag Points
    Tatum having no personality: -10 Flag Points
    Tatum looking exactly right: 10 Flag Points
    Screwing up Baroness' motivations with awful plot twist: -25 Flag Points
    Ubertechnology that hates physics and the laws of thermodynamics and fluid mechanics: -50 Flag Points
    $35 trillion budget but no authority to operate in Paris: -20 Flag Points
    Baroness: 10 Flag Points
    Sienna Miller as Baroness: 100 Flag Points
    Sienna Miller as both blond and raven haired: 50 Points
    Baroness' outfits: 50 Points
    Baroness and Scarlett fight: 10 Flag Points
    Watchable, well-paced action fantasy by Sommers: 50 Flag Points

    = 320 (or so) Flag Points I'd spend to see a sequel. Not a great film, but certainly a watchable one. Better than Transformers. The first one. Absolutely saved by my pants being on fire thanks to the ladies.

    Bonus Spoiler Flag Points below:

    The Night Raven flying Mach 20 with infinite fuel: -25 Flag Points
    Ripcord ejecting in the lower ionosphere and landing on the WH lawn, helmetless and not suffering from oxygen deprivation of hypothermia: -25 Flag Points
    Killing Storm Shadow: -20 Flag Points
    100% Chance he'd be back for sequel anyway: 20 Flag Points
    Driving a motorcycle through Arlington: -25 Flag Points
    Sonic Weapons: 25 Flag Points
     
  10. Cory S.

    Cory S. Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best review you've ever done Chuck....

    And, I agree with everything you said except it being better than Transformers. I'm in the major minority but I think I preferred Revenge of the Fallen and the first film to this one. Something about the giant f'ing robots for me. But, enjoyable as hell, this flick was. No doubt about it.

    And goodness gracious, Rachel Nichols is smokin' hot.
     
  11. James_Kiang

    James_Kiang Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,171
    Likes Received:
    0
    I found the movie to be mostly entertaining. Kind of funny that to me the forced, cheesy lines that hearken back to the cartoon were some of the worst bits in my opinion. It rates higher than Revenge of the Fallen for me, but I still would put the first Bay Transformers movie above it. As for the ladies, I'm not a big Sienna Miller fan but she looked quite good here. I can't complain about Rachel Nichols but she still is not my cup of tea.
     
  12. cineMANIAC

    cineMANIAC Premium
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,050
    Likes Received:
    286
    Location:
    New York City
    Real Name:
    Luis
    I can't believe they're still letting Stephen Sommers make movies! This was dreadful. This guy went downhill fast after Deep Rising
     
  13. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    24,967
    Likes Received:
    2,772
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    The movie isn't as bad as the trailers and commercials make it look but it's still not very good. On the positive side, it does have a sense of fun and it doesn't take itself too seriously (though I can understand that some fans want a mature take on the material).

    On the negative side, the script seems more like a parody of an action movie than a real screenplay (I'm not asking for Chinatown but even with proper expectations, I think it was a pretty lousy script). And some of the CG is downright terrible. There was even green screen shots that looked terrible. Even TV shows can get green screen shots nearly perfect today so it's just embarassing that a big budget movie couldn't do it.
     
  14. Paul Arnette

    Paul Arnette Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Messages:
    2,616
    Likes Received:
    0
    Considering I thought this movie was going to be my children's generation's answer to Megaforce, I came out of it pleasantly surprised. It was by no means a great movie, but I thought it was a good movie considering a summer full of disappointments, Star Trek and Up aside.

    I think that if they can take the same tone, improve some of the special effects, and, most importantly, get back to some costume designs that are reminiscent of the '82-'85 core characters, they'd have a chance at a decent franchise.
     
  15. Steve Christou

    Steve Christou Long Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    15,253
    Likes Received:
    258
    Location:
    London, England
    Real Name:
    Steve Christou
  16. MattFini

    MattFini Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    607
    Likes Received:
    1
    I could not believe how much I liked it.

    I will be getting this on BD as soon as I possibly can.
     

Share This Page