If this a quarterly thing, maybe Sci-Fi Challenge would good be for April and then Comedy And Musical Challenge for July. Not that musicals automatically fit in with comedies but I think a fair number have comedic elements.
I'd like a Blaxploitation challange but I doubt that there would be too many people interested in it.
I was interested in possibly doing something a little less ordinary. Those are just genres I expect people are watching anyway. Of course, someone else can run a challenge on whatever genre they want.
I think thats it Travis. Horror and Sci fi tend to have a bit more obsevive fans who collect a bunch of movies, so they are more accesable. I'd participate in the historical epics and musicals, I just flat have access to near as many titles. If you did a musicals challenge the month after that next Warners box set came out, I'd join in, I just happen to have way more non-musical titles sitting on my "to Watch" shelf that I wat to go through rather then re-watch a bunch of my collection.
Blaxploitation would be fun as well, I again suffer from not having that many titels, not as many as I would llike anyways. Frankly, I'm enough of a nerd that I keep track of what I watch anyways, so I'd do my best to join in to any challenge.
I guess I'd like to see Sci-fi because that's my favourite genre and I have the most titles in that category. I see your point though. My least represented genre in my collection are Westerns and War films. I'm trying to watch more films in either category so for me, they would be good choices. Epics or historical dramas were mentioned. I would be interested in that as well. Maybe we could combine Epics and historical dramas together. Either way, as long as it's not horror, I'm in.
Well, I would definitely like to run one on Historical Drama/Epics. So, my plan would be to do that in March. Maybe someone else would like to run a Sci-Fi challenge in May. My feeling is it's best to skip a month in between each one.
Maybe Russell would like to run a Grindhouse challenge sometime.
OK then, I'll do a Historical Drama/Epics challenge in March. I'll open the thread in a couple weeks.
Here are my thoughts on qualifications.
1) Any movie set in any realistic, historical time period. Not necessarily non-fiction. Examples: A Very Long Engagement: YES. Elizabeth: YES Star Wars: NO. "A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away" doesn't qualify.
2) Any movie with a running time of at least 160 minutes. Examples: Heat: YES. Doctor Zhivago: DOUBLE YES. LOTR: If you must, but the idea is to branch out. Prepare to be mocked. Titus: No under rule 1 (not a realistic time period) but YES under rule 2.
should probably save this for the thread, but I think maybe we should discount LOTR from the historical drama/epics. It is a fantasy right? I know they treat Middle Earth like a real world, it isn't though.
LOTR makes sense to a Sci fi / Fantasy. I see these movie as ones that are monster/science or monster based, but not in a horror movie vane.
I think John's criteria are either/or, not that they must meet both. Hence, some LOTR films would meet the 160 minute minimum (as would "King Kong" 2005 ) as an "epic" defined by Criteria 2.
Star Wars is a sci-fi epic so in that sense it should be included. But I have no problem discounting it. I'll include it in the sci-fi challenge. Oh goody, I get to watch King Kong again.
First, thanks for Tim for suggesting this Winter Crime Theme.
Films
L.A. Confidential D.O.A. Too Late For Tears The Mirror Crack'd The Thin Man Shadow of the Thin Man Murder My Sweet Pickup On South Street 3:10 To Yuma (2007) Zodiac The Lady Vanishes Eastern Promises No Country For Old Men Pulp Fiction