What's new

Need RPTV size advice (1 Viewer)

Brian Bowles

Second Unit
Joined
Dec 3, 2001
Messages
256
I am here again. I am getting real close to purchasing my RPTV. I am going to get a Toshiba HDX 57 or 65. I am not sure which one to get. I will be approximately 11 feet from the front of the couch to the front of the television. What size do you think I should get? There is a picture of the current televsion in the house gallery of my website. Here is the link: Home page

The room is 20'x18' with 12' ceilings. Although the television will go across the room. That is the reason there will only be 11 feet from the front of couch to the television. I will use the set for mostly dvd's but my wife watches mostly cable tv. We are going to have to save up for the HDTV tuner. So we will be a while without it. Also only 3 stations in our area have HDTV. Will the other stations look noticably worse on a 65" than a 57" since it is a larger set? Thanks so much for your time.
 

Alan M

Second Unit
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Messages
454
Your seating position is good at 11' Brian.I sit 14' away from my tosh 65,and could get a little closer.I think the 57 or the 65 would be an excellent choice,and dont think you'd be unhappy w/either.
As far as how good your cable stations will look,kinda depends on your cable.Lousy signals make for lousy pictures,so,yes,if its bad,it'll look worse the larger you go.On the other hand,strong signals(and good quality dvd's)will look good,if not great the larger you go.
Now that I read what i wrote,guess its not much help,but watching dvd's like reign of fire,lotr,and many others is absolutely awe inspiring w/a good progressive scan dvd player and the 65.

Good luck and happy shopping.
 

Joe Becker

Auditioning
Joined
Jan 25, 2003
Messages
14
I sit 9.5 feet away from my 58" Pioneer. I'd prefer to be another foot away on cable, but it's just right for DVD.
 

Jason Spencer

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Apr 5, 2002
Messages
105
I have the 57H82 and sit a little over 9 feet away. It looks great on DVD/HD but cable can be a little soft and jaggy with the TW1 stretch. As far as looking at a 57" TV from this distance, it's perfect. At first it seems BIG, but you get used to it quickly. The one thing you should consider is having to move your eyes to see the whole thing. 57" at 9 feet is borderline too close to see the whole screen without excessive eye movment (and that will give you headaches and eyestrain after long viewing). But I took the plunge and think it is perfect. The main reason I went above my 36" regular TV was size, and anything less than 57 just didn't cut it for me...

If I was at 11 feet (and if I had the money) the 65" would be great! But if you're concerned about cable quality or eyestrain, the 57" would be just as good and may look a little cleaner (with non HD stuff).
 

Rick J

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Nov 27, 2002
Messages
63
brian

i'm ~7-9' from my 53" depending on which couch i'm on. from 7' it's about right and from 9' i could handle bigger. my brother has a 61" and sits ~ 8' although initially it takes a little getting used to, it's right for him. if you're mainly watching movies (w/prog. scan i hope) or hd, then i definitely agree with alan...bigger is better. on the other hand, cable will definitely look worse. analog stinks! i'm also looking into a stb sometime in the near future. i guess you have to weigh your viewing habits. if you haven't yet, i'd recommend going to the store and sitting in front of those two sets for awhile at the viewing distance you'll be at and go from there. no matter what you choose, i think you'll be happy. don't forget to turn those settings down immediately after you get it...good luck! rick
 

Alan Pummill

Screenwriter
Joined
Jul 6, 1999
Messages
1,262
I'm 9.5' from my 58" Pioneer Elite PRO-620HD. The salesman that I bought this from, and who has been to my house, strongly suggested the PRO-620HD over the 64" PRO-720HD.

I am lucky that my Time Warner standard cable signal is excellent!! A friend has a 65" Mits, and he uses a dish for his local stations. He sits about 12' back from his Mits, and sorry to say, the picture is just about unwatchable. But with HD or DVD, it is fantastic!!

You need to really consider how much standard definition you watch when making your decision!! We watch a lot of standard def. TV, and it was why we picked the Elite. It has the best line-doubler and stretch modes on the market, IMHO!!
 

Brian Bowles

Second Unit
Joined
Dec 3, 2001
Messages
256
So you guys think if we watch a lot of cable that the 57" might be a better choice from our viewing distance?
 

Dan_Isaacs

Grip
Joined
Jan 30, 2002
Messages
20
Do you have Digital Cable? We have Time Warner Digital Cable, and they broadcast the HD signals (with the right cable box) for the local netwrok affiliates. They should also carry ESPNHD when it starts up. Check with your provider, if you haven't already.
 

ManW_TheUncool

His Own Fool
Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2001
Messages
11,961
Location
The BK
Real Name
ManW
Why don't you see for yourself?

Go to the store and see how the picture looks to you at 12-13ft eyes-to-screen distance. Make sure to see how regular cable/sat feeds look, not just DVD and HD.

Since you're making a big jump in TV size (judging from your home page's photo), you really have to make sure you (and your wife) can live w/ the PQ of regular cable/sat quality. DVD will probably look good w/ 65" at that distance, but regular cable/sat might be an issue.

If you do go w/ 57", you do have the option of sitting closer in the future when you no longer watch much regular cable/sat and have more HD content to watch. Something to factor in.

Again, see for yourself.

_Man_
 

Alan Pummill

Screenwriter
Joined
Jul 6, 1999
Messages
1,262
I agree. The quality of the signal you receive will be a huge factor in your decision. Also, the amount of standard def. that you watch.

Sometimes on HD or DVD, I'll roll my 58" Elite out about a foot or so. It gives you that encompassing feeling that THX specs call out for!! In that case, I'm only 8.5' away!!

Are you confused yet??;)
 

Brian Bowles

Second Unit
Joined
Dec 3, 2001
Messages
256
Well cable tv is a big issue for my wife. She watches lots of shows on cable tv. We have comcast in this area. I know they offer digital via a box. Is that any better than regular cable tv? I would love to have bigger but I am worried my wife will hate it when she is watching her shows. That makes me kind of hesitant to get the 65" I will definitely need to go to the store and look. I am going to get a Toshiba HDX model. Anyone else? Thanks for your time and opinions.
 

ManW_TheUncool

His Own Fool
Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2001
Messages
11,961
Location
The BK
Real Name
ManW
Digital cable most likely won't look any better than regular cable. If anything, there's good likelihood that some, if not most, digital cable channels will look worse than regular cable, assuming good quality cabling from the provider to you. Most of the digital channels will probably just be digitized versions of the analog channels and may add distracting compression artifacts. It really depends.

_Man_
 

Alan Pummill

Screenwriter
Joined
Jul 6, 1999
Messages
1,262
With my Time Warner cable, the Digital channels look much better than analog. And the HD is fantastic. The small city that I live in has recently been completely wired with fiber optic cable feeds!!!!

I guess it depends on the feed!!
 

ManW_TheUncool

His Own Fool
Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2001
Messages
11,961
Location
The BK
Real Name
ManW
Alan,

I have TWC also in NYC. Which digital channels are you talking about? For me, I guess the premium channels can sometimes look pretty good and probably better than typical analog, but not always the case. However, these channels don't really have analog counterparts to compare.

_Man_
 

MikeRP

Supporting Actor
Joined
Aug 8, 2002
Messages
514
My Time Warner Cable is terrible. So, I'm looking to upgrade to a satellite system.

Brian, I have the 57HDX82 and I sit exactly 11 feet from the set. I looked at your room and you seem to have plenty of wall area so get the 65!!!!!!! The 57 is great but I could have got the 65.

It will seem huge at first but you settle into it easily.
I was limited by space for the TV and other AV gear.

If you decide on the 57 - you'll love it too.

DVD'd are great but the cable signal is all over the place some stations look like DVD quality and most just ____!

Mike
 

Dan_Isaacs

Grip
Joined
Jan 30, 2002
Messages
20
I have a stadard def RPTV, but the digital channels are great. The picture is better, and the sound is awesome. I wouldn't dare watch sports on a non-digital channel if I could help it.

And one thing that seals the Digital deal for me is that my wife loves the Gameshow network. And when HBO et al have free weekends, it's 15 channels of movies, not just one.
 

Timon Russo

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
May 10, 2000
Messages
213
I sit almost 10' from my Mits 65" and its perfect. All I have is regular analog cable right now, and I think it looks quite fine. DVD looks astonishing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,037
Messages
5,129,395
Members
144,285
Latest member
Larsenv
Recent bookmarks
0
Top